Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of shear lag parameters for beam-to-column connections in steel piers

  • Received : 2003.07.21
  • Accepted : 2003.11.27
  • Published : 2004.05.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper presents shear lag parameters for beam-to-column connections in steel box piers. Previous researches have analyzed beam-to-column connections in steel piers using a shear lag parameter ${\eta}_o$ obtained from a simple beam model, which is not based on a reasonable design assumption. Instead, the current paper proposes a cantilever beam model and has proved the effectiveness through theoretical and experimental studies. The paper examines the inaccuracy of the previous researches by estimating the effective width, the width-span length ratio L/b, and the sectional area ratio S of a cantilever beam. Two different shear lag parameters are defined using the cantilever model and the results are compared each other. The first type of shear lag parameter ${\eta}_c$ of a cantilever beam is derived using additional moments from various stress distribution functions while the other shear lag parameter ${\eta}_{eff}$ of a cantilever beam is defined based on the concept of the effective width. An evaluation method for shear lag stresses has been investigated by comparing analytical stresses with test results. Through the study, it could be observed that the shear lag parameter ${\eta}_{eff}$ agrees with ${\eta}_c$ obtained from the $2^{nd}$ order stress distribution function. Also, it could be observed that the shear lag parameter ${\eta}_c$ using the $4^{th}$ order stress distribution function almost converges to the upper bound of test results.

Keywords

References

  1. Beedle, L.S., Topractsoglou, A.A. and Jonhston, B.G. (1951), "Connection for welded continuous portal frames",Welding Journal, 30, 354s-384s.
  2. BS5400 (1982), "Steel concrete and composite bridges, Parts 3 and 5 : Code of practice for design of compositebridges", British Stand Institution, London.
  3. Chang, S.T. and Zheng, F.Z. (1987), "Negative shear lag in cantilever box girder with constant depth", J. Struct.Engrg., ASCE, 113(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:1(20)
  4. Fafitis, A. and Rong, A.Y. (1995), "Analysis of thin-walled box girders by parallel processing", Thin-walledStruct., 21, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(94)00003-I
  5. Fielding, D.J. and Huang, J.S. (1971), "Shear in steel beam-to-column connections", Welding Journal, 50(7),313s-326s.
  6. Hwang, W.S. (1993), "Inelastic behavior and provisions for limit state design of beam-to-column connections insteel bridge pier structures", PH. D. thesis, Osaka University of Japan.
  7. Komatsu, S. (1974), Theory and Design of Thin-Walled Structures, SanKaiDou(in Japanese).
  8. Kuzmanovi , B.O. and Graham, H.J. (1981), "Shear lag in box girder", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(9), 1701-1742.
  9. Lee, C.K. and Wu, G.J. (2000), "Shear lag analysis by the adaptive finite element method-1. Analysis of simpleplated structures", Thin-walled Struct., 38, 285-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00043-4
  10. Luo, Q.Z., Tang, J. and Li, Q.S. (2002), "Experimental studies on shear lag of box girder", Eng. Struct., 24, 464-477.
  11. Malcolm, D.J. and Redwood, R.G. (1970), "Shear lag in stiffened box girders", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 96(ST7),1403-1449.
  12. Moffat, K.R. and Dowling, P.J. (1975), "Shear lag in box girder bridges", Struct. Engrg., 53, 439-448.
  13. Nakai, H., Miki, T. and Hashimoto, Y. (1992), "On limit state design method considering shear lag phenomenonof corner parts of steel rigid frames", JSCE, 455, 95-104(in Japanese).
  14. Okumura, T. and Ishizawa, N. (1968), "The design of knee joints for rigid steel frames with thin walled section",JSCE, 153, 1-17(in Japanese).
  15. Reissner, E. (1946), "Analysis of shear lag in box beams by the principle minimum potential energy", QuarterlyApp. Math., 3(3), 268-278.
  16. Tahan, N., Palovi , M.N. and Kotsovos, M.D. (1997), "Shear-lag revisited : The use of single Fourier series fordetermining the effective breadth in plated structures", Computers & Structures, 63(4), 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00065-X
  17. Tesar, A. (1996), "Shear lag in the behavior of thin walled box bridge", Computers & Structures, 59(4), 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00293-6
  18. Timoshenko, S.P. and Goodier, J.N. (1987), Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 267-268.
  19. Wang, Q.F. (1997), "Lateral buckling of thin-walled members with openings considering shear lag", StructuralEngineering and Mechanics, 5(4), 369-383. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1997.5.4.369

Cited by

  1. Experimental and numerical study on cyclic behaviour of steel beam-to-column joints vol.10, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03215825
  2. Stress concentration and deflection of simply supported box girder including shear lag effect vol.28, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.28.2.207
  3. Central angle effect on connection behavior of steel box beam-to-circular column vol.32, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.4.531
  4. A simplified method for evaluation of shear lag stress in box T-joints considering effect of column flange flexibility vol.73, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.2.167
  5. Investigation of shear lag effect on tension members fillet-welded connections consisting of single and double channel sections vol.74, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.3.445
  6. Simplification of least-work solution to an empirical method for prediction of shear lag stress in steel box moment connections with internal diaphragms vol.28, pp.17, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2019.1710004