Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer (한국토양비료학회지)

Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer (한국토양비료학회)
권호 표지

Soil Quality Assessment Method of Paddy and Upland

논과 밭토양의 질 평가 방법

  • Yoon, Jung-Hui (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Jung, Beung-Gan (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Jun, Hee-Joong (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Kwak, Han-Kang (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA)
  • Received : 2004.11.12
  • Accepted : 2004.12.09
  • Published : 2004.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Modern agriculture depending on chemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides gave rise to questions about long-term sustainability of agriculture in relation to degradation of soil quality. Improving soil quality is prerequisite to sustain biological productivity, maintain environmental quality, and promote plant and animal health. Assessment and monitoring of the health and quality of soil is necessary to provide opportunity to evaluate and redesign soil management system for sustainability. To develop the soil quality assessment method, we collected national data on soil properties of paddy and upland and attempted to evaluate the data in aspect of soil quality by the process of selecting a minimum data set (MDS), scoring the soil properties and calculating soil quality index (SQI) integrating the score of each soil property. This approximation indicated that soil quality index was in the order of paddy soil, upland soil and plastic film house soil.

우리나라 논과 밭토양의 질의 현황에 대한 평가방법을 개발하고자 2000년부터 2003년까지 실시한 농업환경변동조사사업의 결과를 이용하여 세부지표 즉 토양의 주요특성의 선정, 선정된 각 지표의 점수화 또는 등급화와 정량화 방법과 각 세부지표를 종합하여 한개의 토양의 질 지표로 만드는 방법을 검토하였다 한편, 본 시안을 이용하여 전국수준에서 우리나라 논 밭 시설원예지 토양의 질 현황에 대한 평가를 시도한 결과 논토양은 매우 높음, 밭토양은 높음, 그리고 시설원예지 토양은 보통으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrews, S. S., D. L. Karlen, and J. P. Mitchell. 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in northern California. Agric. Ecosy. Environ. 90:25-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
  2. Doran, J. W., D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bezdicek, and B. A. Stewart. 1994. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Spec. Pub. No. 35. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. and Am. Soc. Argon., Madison, WI, USA
  3. Doran, J. W., D. C. Coleman, and A. J. Jones. 1996. Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Spec. Pub. No. 49. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. and Am. Soc. Argon., Madison, WI, USA
  4. Doran, J. W., D. C. Coleman, and T. W. Parkin. 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: A minimum data set. In J. W. Doran and A. J. Jones (ed.) Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA Spec. Pub. No. 49. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. and Am. Soc. Argon., Madison, WI, USA
  5. Goebel, J. J., M. J. Mausbach, and D .L. Karlen. 1997. Using the national resources inventory as framework to assess soil erosion, soil conservation, and soil quality. Seminar Paper No.15. FAO/ECE : ESS(97)74, CES/AC.61/96
  6. Gregorich, E. G., and M. R. Carter. 1997. Soil Quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Elsevier, New York, NY. USA
  7. Jun, H. J., J. H. Yoon, B. G. Jung, and Y. S. Song. 2004. Establishment of optimum level of phosphate and potassium. p. 429-439. In Agro-enviroment research report for 2003. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suweon, Korea
  8. Karlen, D. L., and D. E. Scott. 1994. A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. p. 53-72. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bezdicek and B. A. Stewart (ed.) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Spec. Publ. No. 35. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI, USA
  9. Karlen, D .L., M. J. Mausbach, J. W. Doran, R. G. Cline, R. F. Harris, and G. E. Schuman. 1997. Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61: 4-10 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x
  10. Karlen, D. L., N .C. Wollenhaft, D. C. Erabach, E. C. Berry, J. B. Swan, N. S. Eash, and J. L. Jordahl. 1994a. Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10 years of no-till corn. Soil Tillage Res. 31:149-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(94)90077-9
  11. Karlen, D. L., N. C. Wollenhaft, D .C. Erabach, E .C. Berry, J. B. Swan, N. S. Eash, and J. L. Jordahl. 1994b. Long-term tillage effects on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res. 32:313-327 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(94)00427-G
  12. NIAST. 1999. Fertilizer recommendation for crops. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea
  13. NIAST. 2000. Annual report of the monitoring project on agro-environmental quality. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea
  14. NIAST. 2001. Annual report of the monitoring project on agro-environmental quality. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea
  15. NIAST. 2003. Annual report of the monitoring project on agro-environmental quality. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea
  16. OECD. 1999. Environmental indicators for agriculture: Vol. 1. Concepts and framework. Head of Publication Service, OECD Publication Service, Paris, France
  17. OECD. 1999. Environmental indicators for agriculture: Vol. 2. Issues and design. Head of Publication Service, OECD Publication Service, Paris, France
  18. OECD. 2000. Environmental indicators for agriculture: Method and results - The stocktaking report - Soil quality. COM/AGR/CA/ENV/EPOC(99)129
  19. OECD. 2001. Agri-environmental indicators: Future work in the OECD 2001-2003. COM/AGR/CA/ENV/EPOC(2001)64
  20. OECD. 2001. Environmental indicators for agriculture. Vol. 3. Methods and results. Head of Publication Service, OECD Publication Service, Paris, France
  21. Parr, J. F., R. I. Papendick, S. B. Hornick, and R. E. Meyer. 1992. Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 7:5-11 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300004367
  22. Rust, R. H., R. S. Adams, and W. P. Martin. 1972. Developing a soil quality index. Indic. J. Environ. Qual. 1:243-247
  23. Soil Science Society of America. 1984. Glossary of soil science terms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, WI, USA
  24. Soil Science Society of America. 1996. Glossary of soil science terms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison, WI, USA
  25. US Salinity Laboratory staff. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agri. Handbook No. 60., USDA, Washington D.C., USA
  26. Warkentin, B. P., and H .F. Fletcher. 1997. Soil quality for intensive agriculture. p. 594-598. In Proceedings of international seminar on soil environment and fertilizer management in intensive agriculture. Soc. Sci. Soil and Manure and Natl. Inst. of Agic. Sci., Tokyo, Japan
  27. Wander, M. M., G .L. Walter, T. M. Nissen, G. A. Bollero, S. S. Andrews, and D. A. Cavanaugh-Grant. 2002. Soil quality: science and process. Agron. J. 94: 23-32 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0023
  28. Yoon, J. H., B. G. Jung, and Y. H. Kim. 1998. Dependence of 0.01 M CaCl2 soluble phosphorus on extractable P and P sorptivity in upland soil. J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 33:192-198
  29. Yoon, J. H., L. Y. Kim, P. K. Jung, J. S. Suh, and H. J. Jun. 2003. Development of soil quality indicators. p. 240-258. In Agro-enviroment research report for 2002. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suweon, Korea
  30. Yoon, J. H. 2004. Review and discussion on development of soil quality indicators. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 33:192-198