Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지

An Economic Evaluation of Multi-Functionality of Rural Areas and Benefit Transfer

농촌 다원적 기능의 경제적 가치와 편익이전

  • 신용광 (농촌진흥청 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 이상영 (농촌진흥청 농촌자원개발연구소) ;
  • 김영 (농촌진흥청 농촌자원개발연구소)
  • Published : 2004.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There are recently many studies on evaluating the economic value of multi-functionality of rural areas. However, the regional difference of economic value leads a problem of different evaluation on its economic value for each region in its application to government policy. This problem causes an increase in cost because it creates restriction in policy decisions which put their importance on the time of their execution. This study investigates the propriety of value transfer using Meta Analysis after evaluating the social and cultural value of rural areas among their functions based on CVM model. It finds that the regional difference in the willingness to pay is 0.13% to 31.42%.

Keywords

References

  1. 김태균, 1998, 이선선택형 가상가치평가에서의 가설적 가치와 실제가치, 경제학연구 46(4) : 309-322
  2. 농촌진흥청 농촌생활연구소, 2003 , 농업 . 농촌의 공익적 기능 가치평가연구, 2003년 연구사업보고서
  3. 유진채, 공기서, 2001, CVM에 의한 친환경농업의 비시장적 가치평가, 농업경영 . 정책연구 28(2) : 238-254
  4. 이광석, 1996, 농촌방문의 경제적 편익, 농업경제연구 37 : 147-159
  5. 이광석, 1997, 도시인의 휴가지 및 주거지로서의 농촌선택 성향분석, 농업경제연구 38(1) : 35-46
  6. 이상영, 長谷部正, 野村希晶, 木谷忍, 2002, 멀티미디어를 이용한 농촌경관평가의 한 . 일 비교, 농업경영 . 정책연구 29(4) : 639-658
  7. 이상영, 신용광, 김영, 2003, 농촌의 다원적 기능에 대한 지불의사 분석, 농업경영 . 정책연구 30(3) : 524-535
  8. 이상영, 신용광, 1997, 주민참가에 의한 계단식 논의 다원적 기능 개발, 농업경영 . 정책연구 30(4) : 688-700
  9. 신용광, 2003, 농업 . 농촌이 지닌 다원적 기능 가치의 편익이전, 농촌생활과학 24(2) : 53-58
  10. Berge, J.C.J.M. van den and K.J. Button, 1999, Meta-analysis, economic valuation and environmental economics, Bergh, J.C.J.M. van den 'Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics' : 796-808
  11. Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox, 1964, An Analysis of Transformations, Journal of Royal Statistical Society 26(B) : 211-243
  12. Brookshire and Neill, 1992, Benefit Transfer : Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Water Resources Research 28 : 651-655
  13. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen, 1991, Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 : 1255-1263
  14. Krinsky, I. and A.L. Robb, 1989, on Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, Review of Economics and Statistics 68 : 715-719
  15. Smith, V.K. and J. Huang, 1995, Can Markets Value Air Quality? A Meta -Analysis of Hedonic Property Value Models, Journal of Political Economy 103(1) : 209-227
  16. Smith, V.K. and L.L. Osborne, 1996, Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a 'Scope' Test? A Meta-analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics Management 31 : 287-301