Endocrine Disrupting Effects of the Industrial Wastewater Effluents Discharged from the Treatment Plant

산업폐수처리장 방류수의 내분비계 장애작용 평가

  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate potential endocrine disrupting effects of several industrial wastewater effluents discharged from cosmetic, plaiting, paint, textile industry using EROD bioassay and E-Screen assay. The results of E-screen assay showed that textile industrial wastewater could act as a full agonist and cosmetics and plaiting industrial wastewater could act as a partial agonist. On the contrary, the wastewater discharged from paint industry did not show any estrogenic effect. Estrogenic activity in the effluents of cosmetic and paint industrial wastewater was lower than that in the influents indicating that the wastewater treatment process minimized the effects of discharges on water quality. Despite of these results, it was recognized that wastewater treatment was not always minimize toxic impact. In this study, increased estrogenic effect was observed in the effluents of plating and textile wastewater, and EROD activity was increased in the effluents of cosmetic and plating wastewater.

Keywords

References

  1. Braunbeck T, Hilton DE and Streit B. Fish Ecotoxicology; Birkhauser Verlag Basel/Switzerland, 1998
  2. David E. Kime, Endocrine Disruption in Fish; University of sheffeld, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 1998; 214-219
  3. Dubois M, Plaisance H, Thome JP and Kremers P. Hierar-chical cluster analysis of environmental pollutants thro-ugh P450 induction in cultured hepatic cells; Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1996; 34: 205-215 https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1996.0065
  4. Gelardi A, Federa R, Ferro M, Rindone B, Vigano L and Arllo A. An 'In vitro' Approach to Water Pollution Monitoring; J. Biol. Res: 1996; 125-132
  5. Haux C and Forlin L. Biochemical methods for detecting effects of contaminants on Fish; Ambio, 1988; 17: 376-380
  6. Nagel SC, Saa FS, Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M and Welshons WV. Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol. Environ Health Perspect. 1997; 105: 70 https://doi.org/10.2307/3433065
  7. $Oh^a$ SM, Cheong SY, Sheen YY and Chung KH. Quanti-tative assessment of estrogenic activity in the water environment of Korea by the E-SCREEN assay. The Science of the Total Environment 2000; 263: 161-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00697-5
  8. $Oh^b$ SM, Lee SK and Chung KH. Quantitative assessment of xenoestrogenic environmental pollutants using E-screen assay. Yakhak Hoeji, 2000; 44(5): 416-425
  9. Olea N, Pulgar R, Perez P, Serrano FO, Rivas A, Fertrell AN, Pedraza V, Soto AM and Sonnenschein C. Estroge-nicity of resin-based composites and sealants used in den-tistry, Environ Health Perspect. 1996; 104(3): 298 https://doi.org/10.2307/3432888
  10. Peakall DB and Walker CH. The role of biomarkers in environmental risk assessment; Vertebrates, Ecotoxi-cology 1994; (3): 173-179 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117082
  11. Perez P, Pulgar R, Serrano FO, Villalobos M, Rivas A, Met-zler M, Pedraza V and Olea N. The estrogenicity of bisp-henol A-related diphenylalkanes with various Substitu-ents at the central carbon and the hydroxy groups; Envi-ron Health Perspect. 1998; 106(3): 167 https://doi.org/10.2307/3434318
  12. Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Chung KL, Fernandez MF, Olea N and Serrano FO. The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: An update on estrogenic environmen-tal pollutants. Environ Health Perspect. 103(Suppl 7): 1995; 113 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103s7113
  13. Thomas P. Teleost model for studying the effects of Che-micals on female reproductive endocrine function; J. Eep. Zool. Suppl. 1990; 4: 126-128
  14. Zacharewski T. In Vitro Bioassays for assessing estrogenic substances; Environmental Science & Technology, 1997; 31(3): 613-623 https://doi.org/10.1021/es960530o
  15. Zacharewski T. Identification and assessment of endocrine disruptors, Limitations of in vivo and in vitro assays; Environ Health Perspect. 1998; 106(2): 577 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106577