A Study on Features of Parts of Jikryug and Relations Am]O the Features

직령의 부위별 형태 특성과 상호간의 관련성 연구

  • Published : 2004.08.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine features of parts of Jikryung and relations among the features. Results of the study can be described as follows. 1. The short front and long rear of Jikryung was changed into the long front and long rear of the dress in the late 16th century. Kalgit of quasi-square style as double collar was changed into that of common collar in the late 16th century and then into common semi-circle collar in the early 17th century, when double Sup was also changed Into single Sup. Narrow sleeves of Jikryung were replaced by bean chaff-shaped in the late 16th century and then by wide ones in the early period of the next century. The shape of the side hem of Jikryung was changed from rectangle into trapezoid in the early 17th century Triangle-shaped Moo was changed into trapezoid-shaped one in the late 16th century and then again into triangle in the late 17th century 2. Changes in shapes of the parts of Jikryung were made with them correlated. The collar of Jikryung saw change in its form from double to common as its width was reduced. Double Sup was changed into single one and the narrow, short coat string into the long one as Jikryung became a dress needing less adjustment. The sleeves widened as the length of whajang increased. The side hem of Jikryung saw change in its shape from rectangular to trapezoidal one as its position was changed. Trapezoidal Moo was replaced by triangular one as the sleeve of Jikryung was changed in shape. 3. Changes in shapes of the parts of Jikryung influenced the aesthetic beauty of the dress itself In its first period, Jikryung was simple with long, slim silhouettes. In its second period, the dress was rich with increased volume. Finally in its third period, the dress was characterized by the harmony of simpleness and richness.

Keywords

References

  1. 이주영. 권영숙 (2003). 조선시대 직령의 유형과 특성. 복식. 53(6)
  2. 金美子 (1981). 直領에 관한 연구. 服飾, 5
  3. 李海英 (1989). 韓國 直領交袵式 袍에 관한 硏究. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  4. 朴聖寶 (1992). 朝蘇前期 出土服飾硏究 -王辰倭亂 以前時期를 中心으로- 세종대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  5. 金美子 (1995), 우리나라 포(抱)의 종류와 변천. 한국복식 2천년, 국립민속박물관
  6. 梁淑鄕 (1996). 朝鮮後期一般服飾에 關한 硏究. 전남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  7. 장인우 (1997). 조선중기 일상복의 구조와 구성 -16 .17C 출토복식 중심. 服飾, 35
  8. 李恩珠 (1998), 道抱 양식의 발전에 대한 갈등. 기능론적 분석. 서울여자대학교 박사학위논문
  9. 이주영, 권영숙 (2003) 조선시대 직령의 유형과 특성. 복식. 53(6), pp. 32-36
  10. 尹殷補. '大典後續錄'권3 禮典 雜令 '大小人員勿論文式職表衣前則法地三寸後則去地二寸...庶民表衣前則法地四寸後則去地三寸...'
  11. 權瑛淑. 李珠英(1995 ) 조선 초 . 중기 여자 장의(長衣)제도 -임란전후 출토유물을 중심으로- 釜山大學校 家政大學 硏究報告, 21, pp. 127-131
  12. 朴趾源, 燕岩集 권 14 熱河日記 玉匣夜話
  13. 고종실록. 고종21년 (1884) 윤5월 25. 28일 . 6월3일
  14. 尹殷補. '大典後續錄’ 권3 禮典 雜令 '大小人員勿論文式職表…袖長過手復回至蔚. .庶民表衣袖長過手六寸...; 安輝, ’述古常制’ 제 2권 章服 衣裳
  15. 이주영. 권영숙 (2003). 조선시대 직령의 유형과 특성 복식. 53(6), PP. 37-38
  16. 권영숙 (1999). 문수사 불복장 답호. 전통복식. 한국전통복식연구회, 경춘사. p. 90
  17. 이주영, 권영숙 (2000). 조선시대 직령(直領)제도- 조선왕조실록을 중심으로 복식문화연구, 8(2). pp. 237-260