Effects of Planting Densities and Maturing Types on Growth and Yield of Soybean in Paddy Field

  • Cho, Jin-Woong (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Joon (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Oh, Young-Jin (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Dong (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Bok (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in the southeastern Korea ($36^{\circ}$N) on a commerce silt loam soil at paddy field. Seed were manually planted on 16 July 2003. Plants were planted with plant densities of 70${\times}$10 cm (row width x plant spacing), 50 x 10 cm, and 30 ${\times}$10 cm. Two seedlings per hill were taken prior to V3 stage. Fertilizer was applied prior to plant at a rate of 30-30-34 kg (N-$\textrm{P}_2\textrm{O}_5$-$\textrm{K}_2\textrm{O}$) per ha. Experimental design was a randomized complete block in a split plot arrangement with three replications. Yield from different planting densities responded similarly in three soybean cultivars and increased when planting density increased. Somyeongkong showed the highest increasing rate of yield about 26% by 338 g $\textrm{m}^{-2}$ at 30 x l0 cm compared to yield of conventional planting density (70 x 10 cm). Also, the planting density significantly affected pod and seed number and seed weight, but not seed per pod. The tallest plant appeared at 30${\times}$10 cm. The change of leaf area according to days after emergence showed differently in soybean cultivars. The highest and lowest total dry matter production per square meter appeared at 30 x 10 cm and at 70 x 10 cm, respectively. Crop growth rate (CGR) showed greater at R3∼R4 stages compared with V7∼R2 or R2∼R3 growth stages and showed the greatest at 30 x 10 cm in three soybean cultivars. As late planted soybean, there was a significant relation between seed yield and CGR, and leaf area index (LAI) according to planting densities at before and after the flowering stage. Relationship between seed yield and CGR in three planting densities showed a highly significant positive relation ($\textrm{R}^2$=0.757) at R3 to R4 stages, and significant relations ($\textrm{R}^2$=0.505, 0.617) at V7 to R2 and V2 to V3. Also, there was a highly significant positive difference between seed yield and LAI during R3 to R4 and R2 to R3 stages.

Keywords

References

  1. Beatty, K. D., I. I. Eldridge, and A. M. Simpson, Jr. 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74 : 859-862 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050021x
  2. Board, J. 2000. Light interception efficiency and light quality affect yield compensation of soybean at low plant population. Crop Sci. 40: 1285-1294 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4051285x
  3. Board, J. E. and B. G. Harville. 1996. Growth dynamix during the vegetative period affects yield of narrow-row late-planted soybean. Agron. J. 88 : 567-572 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040012x
  4. Board, I. E., B. G. Harville, and A. M. Saxton. 1990. Branch dry weight in relation to yield increases in narrow-row soybean. Agron. J. 82 : 540-544 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200030021x
  5. Board, J. E., W. Zhang, and B. G. harville. 1996. Yield rankings for soybean cultivars grown in narrow and wide rows with late planting dates. Agron. J. 88 : 240-245 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800020020x
  6. Cho, J. W., M. S. Park, J. J. Lee, M. J. Lee, J. D. Seo, T. S. Kim, and S. B. Lee. 2003. Topping effect on growth and yield of soybean growth in paddy field. Korean J. Crop Sci. 48 : 96-102
  7. Egli, D. B. 1988. Plant density and soybean yield. Crop Sci. 28 : 977-981 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800060023x
  8. Fehr, W. R., C. E. Caviness, and J. J. Vorst. 1977. Response of indeterminate and determinate soybean cultivars to defoliation and half-plant cut-off. Crop Sci. 17 : 913-917 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700060024x
  9. Frederick, J. R., P. J. Bauer, W. J. Busscher, and G. S. McCutcheon. 1998. Tillage management for doublecropped soybean grown in narrow and wide row width culture. Crop Sci. 38 : 755-762 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030023x
  10. Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. Inst. BioI. Stud. BioI. 96. Camelot Press, Southamton, UK
  11. Jiang, H. and D. B. Egli. 1995. Soybean seed number and crop growth rate during flowering. Agron. J. 87 : 264-267 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700020020x
  12. Ikeda, T. 1992. Soybean planting patterns in relation to yield and yield components. Agron. J. 84 : 923-926 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400060002x
  13. Ikeda, T. 2000. Some factors related with net production of soybean population. Japan J. Crop Sci. 12-19
  14. Ikeda, T. and K. Sato. 1990. Relation between plant density and yield components in soybean plants. Japan J. Crop Sci. 59 : 219-224 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.59.219
  15. Kim, H. S., E. H. Hong, S. I. Park, and Y. K. Park. 1993. Responses of growth and yield characters on planting density in determinate and indeterminate soybeans. Korean J. Crop Sci. 38 : 189-195
  16. Kokubun, M. and K. Watanabe. 1982. Analysis of the yield-dertermining process of field-grown soybeans in relation to canopy structure. VI. Characteristics of grain production in relation to plant types as affected by planting patterns and planting densities. Japan J. Crop Sci. 51 : 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.51.51
  17. Lee, H. J., H. S. Kim, and H. S. Lee. 1991. Yield response and light utilization to planting density in soybean cultivars for bean sprouting and for cooking with rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 36 : 177-184
  18. Lueschen, W. E. and D. R. Hicks. 1977. Influence of plant population on field performance of three soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 69 : 390-393 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900030015x
  19. Moore, S. H. 1991. Uniformity of plant spacing effect on soybean population parameters. Crop Sci. 31 : 1049-1051 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100040041x
  20. Wells, R. 1991. Soybean growth response to plant density: relationships among canopy photosynthesis, leaf area, and light interception. Crop Sci. 31 : 755-761 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030044x