Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Biomechanics (한국운동역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison analysis of kinematics of lower extremities for 1st position jump in ballet between two types of ballet shoes

발레의 1st Position 점프 동작 시 신발 유형에 따른 하지의 운동학적 비교분석

  • Published : 2003.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the height of jump, angle of the ankle and knee, the angular velocity of the ankle and knee between two types of ballet shoes during a jump in the 1st position. The subjects were 5 female ballet majors of university in Busan the majors who have been dancing ballet for six years on the average. The conclusions are as follows: 1. The height of jump had no significant difference between two types of ballet shoes, and then the average of the height of jump with point shoes group ($20.24{\pm}4.62\;cm$) was a little higher than ballet shoes group ($17.50{\pm}4.05\;cm$). 2. The angle of the ankle had no significant difference for all events between two types of ballet shoes. The minimum angle of ankle joint was represented to $54.36_{\circ}$ at the E1 of the left ankle angle of the ballet shoes and the maximum value was showed $155.43_{\circ}$ at the E3 of the right ankle angle of the point shoes. 3. The angle of the knee had no significant difference for all events between two types of ballet shoes. The minimum angle of knee joint was represented to $99.54_{\circ}$ at the E1 of the left knee angle of the ballet shoes and the maximum value was showed $174.25_{\circ}$ at the E3 of the right knee angle of the point shoes. 4. The ankle velocity of the ankle had no significant difference for all events between two types of ballet shoes. The minimum angular velocity of the ankle was represented to 4.35 deg/s at the maximum height(E3) of the point shoes and the maximum value was showed 597.81 deg/s at the take-off(E2) of the right ankle angle of the point shoes. 5. The angular velocity of the knee had significant difference between two types of ballet shoes at the event 1(p<.05). The minimum angular velocity of the hee was represented to -1.68 deg/s at the maximum height(E3) of the point shoes and the maximum value was showed 360.25 deg/s at the take-off(E2) of the left knee angle of the ballet shoes. The other events had no significant difference between two types of ballet shoes.

Keywords

References

  1. 권영후(2001). 역학적 관점에서의 무용의 이해: 무용역학. 서울: 대한무용학회 제30집, pp. 134-143.
  2. 민현선(1996). 발의 기본 포지션에 따른 쏘떼(saute) 동작의 운동학적 분석. 미간행 석사학위논문 경성대학교 대학원.
  3. 서차영(1983). 무용수의 외상발생 요인에 관한 조사 연구. 한국체육학회지 22, 2, 71-78.
  4. 송인아(1998). Turn-out과 Parallel 수직점프의 무용역학적 분석. 대한무용학회 제20집: 267-286.
  5. 인아(1998). 발레 Turn-out 수직점프의 미적 특성에 대한 무용역학적 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문 이화여자대학교 대학원.
  6. Chatfield, S.J. (1993). Electromyographic response of dancers to isokinetic work andselect dance movement. Kinesiology and Medicine for Dance 16, 60-82.
  7. Chatfield, S. J., Sveistrup, H., Woollcott, M. H., & Barr, S.(1996). Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of movement repatterning in dance. Impulse 4, 220-234.
  8. Fitt, S.S. (1996). Dance Kinesiology. USA: Schirmer books.
  9. Grant, G.(1982). Technical manual and dictionary of classical ballet. New York.
  10. Laws, K.(2002). Physics and the art of dance. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  11. Milan, K. R. (1994). Injury in ballet: a review of relevant topics for the physical therapist. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(96)00166-4
  12. Steffen, R. J.(1986). The effect of fatigue on the performance of a vertical jump in dance. Unpublished Master of arts Dissertation. University of New York.
  13. Trepman, E., Gellman, R. E., Micheli, L, J., & De Luca, C. J.(1998). Electromyographic analysis of grand-plie in ballet and modern dancers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 30, 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199812000-00009
  14. Trepman, E., Gellman, R. E., Solomon, R., Ramesh-Murphy, K., Micheli, L. J., & De Luca, C. J.(1994). Electromyographic analysis of standing posture and demi-plie in ballet and modern dancers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 26, 771-782. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199406000-00018
  15. Vaganova, A.(1969). Basic principles of classical Ballet. New York: Dover Publications.
  16. Wiesler, E. R., Hunter, D. M., Martin, D. F., Curl, W. W., & Hoen, H.(1996). Ankle flexibility and injury patterns in dancers. Am J Sports Med 24, 754-757. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400609
  17. White, J.(1996). Teaching classical ballet. Florida: Univ. press of Florida.