The Integrated Assessment Model for the Conservation of Natural Environment - Focused on Site Selection for the National Trust -

자연환경 보전을 위한 통합 평가모형 - 내셔널 트러스트 후보지 선정을 중심으로 -

  • Jung, Sung-Gwan (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • You, Ju-Han (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
  • 정성관 (경북대학교 농업생명과학대학 조경학과) ;
  • 유주한 (경북대학교 농업생명과학대학 조경학과)
  • Received : 2003.03.04
  • Accepted : 2003.04.11
  • Published : 2003.05.31

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to propose the integrated assessment model for the rational and effective selection of proposed sites in National Trust (NT) and conserve the ruined natural environment by excessive land development. The results of this study are as follows; 1) The specialists thought that rare and endangered species were very important in plant and animal, in case of landscape and environment, naturality and water quality were too important. 2) In the result of the correlation measure on the indicator of assessment, 'erosion of soil'and 'air pollutant'was highly correlative. Secondly, 'suspended solids' and 'erosion of soil'was high correlation. 3) In the result of forming the factors into the integrated indicators, they were classified into conditional, stable, valuable and potential factors and the purpose of this formation is to evaluate proposed sites in NT objectively and rationally with organic assessment. 4) In the integrated assessment model, the degree of explanation was observed approximately 36.4% and the important factor was the conditional factor, but we have to consider all factors for the effective and objective assessment. Therefore we organically have to apply and use them for the assessment of proposed sites in NT. It turns out to offer raw data on the land conservation and carry out the role of the instrument of measurement. As for future directions, the follow are proposed: 1) adaptation of real proposed site, 2) verification of effect and problem, 3) practical survey for diverse types as mountain, coast and inland.

Keywords

References

  1. 김귀곤, 조동길, 차영두, 황기현. 2000. 생태공원조성을 위한 식재설계방법의 개발 -시각적선호도와 생태적 다양성의 상호관련성을 중심으로-, 한국조경학회지, 27(5), 12-24
  2. 김동엽, 유정환, 채지석, 차순형, 1996. 대기오염물질의 산림생태계내 유입과 토양의 화학적 특성변화, 한국임학회지, 85(1), 84-95
  3. 김세천, 1996. 국립공원 개발에 따른 경관영향평가치에 관한 연구 -덕유산 국립공원을 중심으로-, 한국임학회지, 85(2), 195-209
  4. 나정화, 1999, 대곡수목원조성에 따른 비오톱구조분석, 한국정원학회지, 17(4), 167-172
  5. 내셔널 트러스트운동, 2002, 내셔널 트러스트운동/ 2002년 5월 이야기
  6. 노재현. 1998. 공원녹지내 귀화식물 출현실태 분석에 관한 연구 - 전라북도 지역을 중심으로-, 한국조경학회지. 26(3). 66-77
  7. 류상옥, 김주용, 유환수. 2000. 반폐쇄된 무안만에서 부유물질의 계절적 변동 및 운반양상. 한국지구과학회지, 21(2), 128-136
  8. 박경훈. 정성관, 1999, ESSD 개념을 도입한 대구시 녹지보전등급 설정에 관한 연구, 한국환경영향평가학회지, 8(3), 23-34
  9. 위인선, 백순기, 이종빈, 나철호, 1991, 수환경오염에 대한 수서곤충 지표종에 관한 연구 - 영산강을 중심으로-, 한국환경생물학회지, 9(1), 42-54
  10. 윤진일, 황규홍, 신만용, 정현향, 임준택, 신진철, 1997, 주암 다목적 댐 건설에 따른 국지기후변화가 농작물 생산성에 미치는 영향. 한국기상학회지, 33(3),409-427
  11. 이기철, 김경완, 2001, 미개발 근린공원의 개발 우선순위 결정. 한국조경학회지, 29(1), 80-91
  12. 이형석, 2001. 무등산 NT 운동사례, 제13돌 무등산의 날 기념 전국심포지운. 33-40
  13. 최신석, 어성준, 박준우, 정평림, 황명기, 2001, 강원도 평창강일대 저서성 대형 무척추동물의 군집구조 및 수질의 생물학적 평가. 한국환경생물학회지, 19(2), 19-128
  14. 한국경관생태연구회, 2001, 경관생태학, 동화기술, 303-319
  15. Chansheng, He, Stephen B, Malcolm, Kenneth A. Dahlberg and Bojie Fu, 2002, A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management, Landscape and Urban Planning, 49, 29
  16. Fisher, William S., 1998, Development and validation of ecoligical indicators: an ORD approach, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51, 23-24 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005909103001
  17. Mayeld, A., 1995, Habitat restoration: the sherbome park estate watemneadows, Biological Journal of Linnean Society, 56, 225-227 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01137.x
  18. Mulberry, S., 1995, High brown fritillary management in the Hedden valley and at Watermeet, Exmoor, Devon, Biological Joumal of Linnean Society, 56, 95-96 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01122.x
  19. Stoms, David M., 1999, GAP management status and regional indicator of threats to biodiversity, Landscape Ecology, 15, 21
  20. Strijker, D., F. J. Sijitsma and D. Wiersma, 2000, Evaluation of nature conservation, Environment and Resource Economics, 16, 363-364 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008344604392