A Histo-Pathological Study of Effect on Periodontal Regeneration with Calcium Sulfate Membrane on The Grade II Furcation Defects in Beagle Dogs

성견 치근이개부 병소에서 Calcium Sulfate 차폐막이 치주조직 재생에 미치는 영향에 대한 조직 병리학적 연구

  • Kim, Young-Chool (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Lee, Chong-Heon (Department of Pathology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
  • 김영출 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 임성빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이종헌 (단국대학교 치과대학 병리학교실)
  • Published : 2003.12.31

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effects of guided tissue regeneration using xenograft material(deproteinated bovine bone powder), with and without Calcium sulfate membrane in beagle dogs. Contralateral fenestration defects (6 ${\times}$ 4 mm) were created 4 mm apical to the buccal alveolar crest of maxillary premolar teeth in 5 beagle dogs. Deproteinated bovine bone powders were implanted into fenestration defect and one randomly covered Calcium sulfate membrane (experimental group). Calcium sulfate membrane was used to provide GTR. Tissue blocks including defects with soft tissues which were harvested following four & eight weeks healing interval, prepared for histo-phathologic analysis. The results of this study were as follows, 1. In control group, at 4 weeks after surgery, new bony trabecular contacted with interstitial tissue and osteocytes lie cell were arranged in new bony trabecule. Bony lamellation was not observed. 2. In control group , at 8 weeks after surgery, scar-like interstitial tissue was filled defect and bony trabecule form lamellation. New bony trabecular was contacted with interstitial tissue but defect was not filled yet. 3. In experimental group, at 4 weeks after surgery, new bony trabecular partially recovered around damaged bone. But new bony trabecule was observed as irregularity and lower density. 4. In experimental group, at 8 weeks after surgery, lamella bone trabecular developed around bone cavity and damaged tissue was replaced with dense interstitial tissue. In conclusion, new bone formation regenerated more in experimental than control groups and there was seen observe more regular bony trabecular in experimental than control groups at 4 weeks after surgery. In control group, at 8 weeks after surgery, the defects was filled with scar-like interstitial tissue but, in experimental group, the defects was connected with new bone. Therefore xenograft material had osteoconduction but could not fill the defects. We thought that the effective regeneration of periodontal tissue, could be achieved using GTR with Calcium sulfate membrane.

Keywords

References

  1. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of Periodontal tissue. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-260 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  2. Gottlow J. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennstrom J. New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:604-616
  3. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human Periodontol disease. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:290-296 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02095.x
  4. Wikesjo UME, Sigurdsson TJ: Guided Bone Regeneration: Is it a reproducible technique? J Parodontol Implantol Orale 1994; 13: 243-257
  5. Mariano Sanz, Ion Zabalegui, Alfonso Vila, Alberto Sicilia: Guided tissue regeneration in human class II furcations and interproximal infrabony defects after using a bioabsorbable membrane barrier. The International Jonual of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
  6. Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Wikesjo UM. Surgical treatment of intrabony Periodontal defects using e-PTFE barrier membranes: Influence of defect configuration on healing response. J Periodontol 1993;64:730-733 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.8.730
  7. Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Chamberlain AD, Wilkesj, UME, Nilveus RE. Regenerative surgery of intrabony Periodontol defects using e-PTFE barrier evaluation of retrieved membranes versus clinical healing. J Periodontol 1992;63:974-978 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.974
  8. Robert P, Mauduit J, Frank RM, Vert M. Biocompatibility and resorbability of a polylactic acid membrane for Periodontal guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 1993;14:353-358 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90054-6
  9. Galgut PN. Oxidized cellulose mesh used as a biodegradable barrier membrane in the technique of guided tissue regeneration. A case report. J Periodontol 1990;61:766-768 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.12.766
  10. Fleisher N, de Waal H, Bloom A. Regeneration of lost attachment apparatus in the dog using vicryl absorbable mesh(Polyglactin 910). Int J Periodont Resto Dent 1988;8:44-55
  11. Pitaru S, Tal H, Soldinger M, Grosskopf A, Noff M. Partial regeneration of Periodontol tissues using collagen barriers. Initial observations in the canine. I Periodontol 1988;59:380-386 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.6.380
  12. Frame JW, Rout PG, Browne RM. Ride augmentation using solid and porous hydroxyapatite particles with and without autogenous bone or plaster. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:771-777 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90200-X
  13. Peltier LF. The treatment of open fractures. In Peltier LF. The treatment of fractures: History & iconography. San Francisco: Norman Publishing. 1990
  14. Sottosanti JS. Calcium sulfate: a biodegradable and biocompatible barrier for guided tissue regeneration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1992;13:226-234
  15. Sottosanti JS. Aesthetic extraction with calcium sulfate and the principles of guided tissue regeneration. Pract Periodont & Aesthetic Dent 1993;5:61-69
  16. Sottosanti JS. Calcium sulfate is a safe, resorbable barrier adjunct to implant surgical procedures. Dental Implnatology Update 1993;4:69-73
  17. Bier SJ. Plaster of Paris, an surgical dressing. New York State Dent J 1970;36:347-352
  18. Bahn SL. Plaster: a bone substitute. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;21:672-681 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90045-4
  19. Radentz WH, Collings CK. The implantation of plaster of Paris in the alveolar process of the dog. J Periodontol 1965;36:357-364 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.5.357
  20. 최동훈, 최성호, 조규성, 채중규, 김종관, 문익상. The effect of calcium sulfate on the periodontal healing of 2-wall intrabony defects in dogs. 대한치주과학회지 1997;27:395-403
  21. Kim CK, Chai JK, Cho KS, Moon IS, Choi SH, Sottosanti JS, Wikesjo ME. Periodontol repair in intrabony defects treated with a calcium sulfate implant and calcium sulfate barrier. J Periodontol 1998;69:1317-1324 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.12.1317
  22. Bell WH. Resorption characteristics of bone substitutes. Ora Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1964;17:650-657 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(64)90372-X
  23. Durwin A, Chamberlain H, Garrett S, Renvert S, Egelberg J. Healing after treatment of Periodontal intraosseous defects. IV. Effect of a nonresective versus a partially resective approach. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12:525-539
  24. Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Wikesjo UM. Surgical treatment of intrabony Periodontal defects using e-PTFE barrier membranes: Influence of defect configuration on healing response. J Periodontol 1993;64:730-733 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.8.730
  25. Jan Gottlow, Lars Laurell, Dan Lundgren et al: Periodontal tissue response to a new bioresorbable guided tissue regeneration device : A longitudinal study in monkeys. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994; 14:437-449)
  26. de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of bioabsorbable barrier material and Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1996;67:1193-1200 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.11.1193
  27. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M, Jancovic S, Orsini M. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:581-586 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.110035
  28. Lundgren D, Slotte C: Reconstruction of Anatomically Complicated Periodontal Defects Using a Bioresorbable GTR Barrier Supported by Bone Mineral. A 6-Month Follow-Up Study of 6 Cases. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 56-62 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260110.x
  29. Hurzeler MB, Kohal RJ, Naghshbandi J, Mota LF, Conradt J, Hutmacher D, Caffesse RG: Evaluation of a New Bioresorbable Barrier to Facilitate Guided Bone Regeneration Around Exposed Implant Threads. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27: 315-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80623-X
  30. D. De Leonardis, A.K. Garg, V. Pedrazzoli, and G.E. Pecora: Clinical evaluation of the treatment of class II furcation involvements with bioabsorbable barriers alone or associated with demineralized freeze-deried bone allograft. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 8-12
  31. Shaffer CD, App GR. The use of plaster of Paris in treating infrabony Periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol 1971;42:685-689 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1971.42.11.685
  32. Najjar Ta, Lerdrit W, Parsons JR. Enhanced osseointegration of hydroxyapatite implant material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:9-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90512-B
  33. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M, Jancovic S, Orsini M. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:581-586 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.110035
  34. Kiritsy CP, Lynch AB, Lynch SE. Role of growth factors in cutaneous wound healing: A review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1993;4:729-760 https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411930040050401