Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative behaviour of stiffened and unstiffened welded tubular joints of offshore platforms

  • Thandavamoorthy, T.S. (Shock and Vibration Laboratory, Structural Engineering Research Centre, CSIR Campus)
  • Received : 2003.04.07
  • Accepted : 2003.08.04
  • Published : 2003.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an experimental investigation conducted on welded tubular joints, that are employed in offshore platforms, to study the behaviour and strength of these joints under axial brace compression loading. The geometrical configuration of the joints tested were T and Y. The nominal diameter of the chord and brace members of the joint were 324 and 219 mm respectively. The chord thickness was 12 mm and the brace 8 mm. The tested joints are approximately quarter size when compared to the largest joints in the platforms built in a shallow water depth of 80 m in the Bombay High field. Some of the joints were actually fabricated by a leading offshore agency which firm is directly involved in the fabrication of prototype structures. Strength of the internally ring-stiffened joints was found to be almost twice that of the unstiffened joints of the same configuration and dimensions. Bending of the chord as a whole was observed to be the predominant mode of deformation of the internally ring-stiffened joints in contrast to ovaling and punching shear of the unstiffened joints. It was observed in this investigation that unstiffened joint was stiffer in ovaling mode than in bending and that midspan deflection of unstiffened joint was insignificant when compared to that of the internally ring stiffened joint. The measured midspan deflection of the unstiffened joint in this investigation and its relation with the applied axial load compares very well with that predicted for the brace axial displacement by energy method published in the literature. A comparison of the measured deflection and ovaling of the unstiffened joint was made with that published by the author elsewhere in which numerical prediction of both quantities have been made using ANSYS software package. The agreement was found to be quite good.

Keywords

References

  1. API RP 2A-LRFD, (1993), Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Load and Resistant Factor Design. American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C.
  2. Bolt, H.M., Billington, C.J., and Ward, J.K. (1994), "Results from large scale ultimate load tests on tubular jacket frame structures", Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 94, Houston, May 2-5, 2, 303-312.
  3. Bozhen, C. (1990), "Stress analysis of ring stiffened tubular joints for offshore structures-review of studies in China", China Ocean Engineering, 4, 1-12.
  4. Chen, W.J. and Han, D.J. (1985), Tubular Members in Offshore Structures. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston.
  5. Digre, K.A., Krieger, W., Wisch, D.J., and Petrauskas, C. (1994), "API RP 2A draft section 17 assesment of existing platforms", Behaviour of Offshore Structures, BOSS '94, C. Chryssostomidis, et al., eds., Pergamon, Oxford, 467-478.
  6. Graff, W.J. (1981), Introduction to Offshore Structures. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston.
  7. Hauch, S.R. and Bai, Y. (2000), "Bending moment capacity of pipes", J. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, 122(4), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1314866
  8. IS: 226, (1975), Indian Standard Specification for Structural Steel (Standard Quality). Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi.
  9. Kekre, S.Y. (1994), "Engineering and contruction division of ONGC Bombay- A vision for globalisation", Oil Asia Journal 15, Petrotech '95 Special, 90-94.
  10. Lalani, M., Tebett, I.E., and Choo, B.S. (1986), "Improved fatigue life estimation of tubular joints", Proc. 18th Annual Offshore Technology Conf., Houston, 133-146.
  11. Leen, S.B. and Hyde, T.H. (2000), "On the prediction of elastic-plastic generalized load-displacement responses for tubular joints", Journal of Strain Analysis, 35(3), March, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324001514350
  12. Nwosu, D.I., Swamidas, A.S.J., Munaswami, K. (1995), "Numerical stress analysis of internal ring stiffened tubular T joints", Journal Offshore of Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 117, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2827061
  13. Ramachanda Murthy, D.S., Madhava Rao, A.G., Gandhi, P., Thandavamoorthy T.S., Pant, P.K., and Murthy, V.S.R. (1991), "Analytical and experimental investigations on internally ring stiffened steel tubular joints", Fatigue and Fracture in Steel and Concrete Structures, A.G Madhava Rao and T.V.S.R. Appa Rao, eds., Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., Pvt., Ltd., New Delhi, 715-728.
  14. Sawada, Y., Idogaki, S., and Sekita, K. (1979), "Static and fatigue tests on T joints stiffened by an internal ring", Proc., 11th Annual Offshore Technology Conf., 1, 563-572.
  15. Shiyekar, M.R., Kalani, M., and Belkune, R.M. (1983), "Stresses in stiffened tubular T joint of an offshore structure", Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 105, 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3230899
  16. Shiyekar, M.R., and Kalani, M. (1983), "Stresses in stiffened tubular Y joints under axial and in-plane moment loadings", Proc., Second International Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, 258-265.
  17. Tahan, N., Chols, N.W.N., Sharp, T.V., and Ma, S.Y.A. (1992), "Uncertainties associated with the behavior of ring-stiffened joints derived from an in-service database", Behavior of Offshore Structures, BOSS '92, M.H. Patel and R. Gibbins, eds., BPP Technical Services, London, UK, Supplement.
  18. Thandavamoorthy, T.S. (1998), "Assessment and rehabiliation of damaged steel offshore structures", Ph.D thesis, Anna University, Chennai.
  19. Thandavamoorthy, T.S. (2002), "Finite element modeling of the behaviour of internally ring stiffened T-joint of offshore platforms", Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 83, November, 139-145.
  20. Thandavamoorthy, T.S., and Senthil Anand, A.P. (2002), "Ultimate strength and behaviour of tubular joints-FEM using ANSYS", Proc. ANSYS India User Conference, Bangalore, November 7-8, Paper No. 11, (in CD).
  21. UEG, (1985a), Design of Tubular Joints of Offshore Structures. 1, Under Water Engineering Group, London.
  22. UEG, (1985b), Design of Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures. 2, Under Water Engineering Group, London.
  23. UEG, (1985c), Design of Tubular Joints for Offshore Structures. 3, Under Water Engineering Group, London.
  24. Wimpey Offshore, (1991), "In-service database for ring stiffened tubular joints," Wimpey Offshore Ltd., Report No. WOL 035/91, London, UK.
  25. Yamasaki, T., Takizawa, S., and Komatsu, M. (1979), "Static and fatigue tests on large size tubular T-joints", Proc., 11th Annual Offshore Technology Conf., Houston, Texas, April 30- May 3, Paper 3424, 583-591.

Cited by

  1. Strength of internally ring-stiffened tubular DT-joints subjected to brace axial loading vol.125, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.06.012
  2. Reserve capacity of fatigue damaged internally ring stiffened tubular joints vol.4, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.2.149