Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

The Development of Motivation Scale in the Visual Artistic Giftedness of the Elementary School Children

학동기 미술영재성 동기요인 검사도구 개발

  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop the instruments which can measure motivation as a component of Visual Artistic Giftedness with in elementary school period. This study prescribed the variable factors of measurement after abstract and classify the characteristics of Visual Artistic Giftedness through literature studies. And it produced instruments those are finally composed of 27 items through the preliminary test. They were evaluated in terms of content validity, construct validity, and reliability by implementing them to 679 elementary school children from the first to sixth grades. Statistical analyses were carried out to verify the validities and reliability. Content validity was found to be satisfactory by experts' evaluation on the test items. Construct validity was also found to be satisfactory through factor analyses which showed the four factors which the identification instruments were intended to measure such as, interest/ attitude/ taste, endurance/ concentration, curiosity/ imagination! sensitiveness, aesthetic. Concurrent validity was also found to be satisfactory with high coeffients of Barron- Welsh which were calculated as .76 in motivation. In conclusion, the instruments about motivation of Visual Artistic Giftedness during elementary school period developed by this study are highly reliable on its reliability and validity.

본 연구는 학동기 미술영재성의 동기요인 검사도구를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 연구는 문헌연구를 통해 미술영재성의 특성을 추출하여 유목화한 후 측정변인으로 규정하였으며, 각각의 측정변인별로 문항을 개발하여 예비검사 과정을 통하여 최종적으로 27문항으로 구성된 검사도구를 제작하였다. 담임교사의 지명을 받은 초등학교 1학년에서 6학년 679명을 연구대상으로 본 검사를 실시하였다. 검사도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 경험적으로 검증한 결과 .93의 높은 신뢰도를 확보하였다. 한편 초등교육학 전문가, 영재교육 전문가, 미술전문가, 교육통계전문가 4인의 내용타당도를 확보하였으며, 주성분 요인 추출방법으로 요인을 추출하여 Varimax방법으로 직각회전을 한 구인타당도 검증에서는 흥미/태도/취미 요인, 인내/열중 요인, 호기심/상상력/민감성 요인, 심미적 요인이 추출되었다. 공인타당도면에서는 Barren-Welsh 검사와의 상관에서 76의 상관을 나타냄으로써 공인타당도가 검증되었다 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 학동기 미술영재성 동기요인 검사도구는 신뢰도와 타당도가 양호하게 검증되었다고 볼 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김춘미(2001). 창조적 문화인프라 구축을 위한 영재 및 고급인재 양성. 2001년도 한국영재학회 춘계학술세미나 자료집(pp. 191-215). 서울: 한국영재학회
  2. 김재은(1995). 그림에 의한 아동의 심리진단. 서울: 교육과학사
  3. 이용애(2001). 미술영재성의 구성요인 추출에 관한 이론전 고찰, 초등교육학연구, 8(1). 149-168
  4. 이용애(2002). 미술영재성의 개념 정의 모델 탐색. 초등교육학연구 19(1)
  5. Cane, F. (1936). The gifted child in art. Journal of Educational Sociology, 10(2), 67-73 https://doi.org/10.2307/2262037
  6. Conant, H., & Randall, A. (1959). Art in education. Peoria, IL: Charles A. Bennett
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R E. (1986). Culture, time, and development of talent, InR. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson, Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 264-284), Cambridge:Cambridge University Rress
  8. Doob, H. S. (1975). Gifted students: Identification, techniques and program organization.Arlington, VA: Education Research Service
  9. Eisner, E. W. (1972). Eduoating artistic vision New York: The Macmillan Company
  10. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity, In R. J.Stemberg, Handbock of Creativity(pp. 273-296), Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress
  11. Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universaIs in cognitive development New Jersey, Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation
  12. Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature's gambit New York: Basic Books
  13. Fritz, H. E. (1930). A search for and conservation of the gifted. BulIetin. of High points.12(8), 19-2
  14. Gaitskell, C. D., Hurwitz, A., & Day, M. (1982, 2001). children and their art: methods forthe elementary school(4th, 8th eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc
  15. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: the significance of children's drawings. New York:Basic Books Inc
  16. Getzds, J., & Csikszenthmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study ofproblem finding in art New York: John Wiley and Sons
  17. Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures cf intellectual maturity: A revisionand extension of Goodenough draw-a-man. test New Yoik: Harcourt, Brace andWorld
  18. Hildreth, G. H. (1966). Introduction to the gifted New York: McGraw-Hill
  19. Hurwitz, A. (1983). The gifted and talented in. art: a guide to program planning.Worcester, MA: Davis Publications
  20. Jellen, H. G., & Venduin. J. R (1986). Handbook for differential eduoation of the gifted: Ataxonomy of 32 key concepts. Carbondale, IL Southem Illinois University Press
  21. Klar, W. H., & Winslow, L. L. (1933). Art education in principle and practice. Spring field,MA: C. Valentine Kirby
  22. Kough, Jr., & DeHaan, R. (1955). Teacher' guidance handbook, elementary school editionVoluume I: Identifying children with special needs. Chicago: Science ResearchAssociates
  23. Lark-Horovitz, B. (1941). On learning abilities in children recorded in a drawingexperiment: I, subject matter and 2, aesthetic and representational qualities. Joural ofExperimental Eduoation, 9(4), 332-360
  24. Lark-Horovitz, B, & Norton, J. A. (1959, 1960). Children's art abilities: The interrelationsand factorial structure of ten characteristics. Chitd Deuetopment, 30(4), 433-452;31(1), 453-462
  25. Lark-Hortvitz, B., Lewis, H., & Luca, M (1967, 1973). Understanding children's art forbetter teaching: Columbus, OH: Charles E
  26. Lindstrom, M. (1957). Children's art: Berkeley: University of California Press
  27. Lowenfeld, V., & Britain, W. L. (1964, 1987). Creative and mental growth. New York:Macmillan
  28. Luca, M., & Allen, B. (1974). Teaching gifted children art in. grades one through three.Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education
  29. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and. talented, VoI. 1. Report to the Congressof the United States by US Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC USGovernment Printing Office
  30. Munro, T. (1956). Art education; Its philosophy and psychoIogy. New York: The LiberalArts Press
  31. Parke, B., & Ness, T. (1988). Curricular decdsion making for the education of youngchildren. The Gifted ChiId QuarterIy, 32(1), 196-199 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200102
  32. Parker, J. P. (1989). Instructional strategies for teaching the gifted. Massachusetts: Allynand Bacon, Inc
  33. Peterson, N. (1977). Project success in art Introductory packet Poulsho, WA: NorthKitsap School District, Bureau of Elementary and Secondary Education
  34. Salome, R A. (1974). Identifying and instructing the gifted in art, Art Education, 27, 16-19
  35. Swassing, R. H. (1985). Teaching gifted children and adolescents. Colurnbus, OH: CharlesE. Merrill
  36. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1963, 1986). Gifted Children. Psychological and educationalperspectives. New York: Macmillan
  37. Vinache, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York: McGraw-Hill
  38. Walberg, H. J. (1993). Creativity and talent as learning, In R. J. Stemberg(1989). Thenature of creativity(pp. 340-361), NY : Press Stndicate of the University ofCambridge
  39. Whipple, G. M. (1919). classes for gifted children Bloornington, IL Public SchoolPublishing Company
  40. Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in thedrawings of young people. Art Education, 30(1), 5-12 https://doi.org/10.2307/3192200
  41. Ziegfeld, E. (Ed.). (1961). Art for the academically talented studented in the secondaryschool, Washington, DC: NEA/NAEA