Journal of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회지)

The Korean Society of Embryo Transfer (한국수정란이식학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Ovary Transport Temperature on Survivability and Maturation Rate of Canine Oocytes

개 난소 수송온도에 따른 미성숙 난자의 생존율과 핵 성숙율

  • 이효상 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 윤희준 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 이영호 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 공일근 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 동물자원과학과)
  • Published : 2003.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examined the viability of canine oocytes following storage at 4 or 38$^{\circ}C$ for 5 h. Cumulus intact oocytes were collected from domestic dog following ovariohysterectomy at local veterinary clinics. In Exp I, the oocytes that collected from ovary transport different temperatures (4 or 38$^{\circ}C$) for 5 h, were cultured for (24 or 48 h). Survivability of oocytes judged by morphological appearance and PI (propidium iodide) staining. The survival rates at 4$^{\circ}C$ ovary transport group showed significantly lower than control group (0%; 0/129 vs. 72.9%; 129/177) 48 h after culture (P<0.05). In Exp II, to assess nuclear maturation of control group oocytes (ovary transported at 38$^{\circ}C$) after in vitro cultured for 24, 48 or 96 h. After 24 h and 48 h of culture, the metaphase I to metaphase II stages (MI to MII) was 8.3% (6/72) and 8.9% (9/101), and which was not increased at 96h (9.5%; 8/84). These results show that canine oocytes remarkably sensitive to low temperature and the percentage of oocytes reaching MI to MII did not increase 96 h after culture.

본 연구는 개 난소의 수송온도가 난자의 생존률에 미치는 영향과 체외성숙 배양시 성숙률에 미치는 영향에 대하여 검토하였다. 1. 개 난소를 4$^{\circ}C$와 38$^{\circ}C$에 저장 후 5시간 내로 연구실로 운반한 난소에서 채취한 난자를 체외배양 하여 생존율을 조사한 결과 체외배양 24시간째 13.2%(15/114), 77.8%(105/135)의 생존율을 보였으며, 48시간째는 0% (0/129), 72.9% (129/177) 의 생존율을 나타내어 38$^{\circ}C$에 수송한 난소에서 채취한 난자가 4$^{\circ}C$에 수송한 난소에서 채취한 난자보다 유의적으로 높은 생존율을 보였다. 2. 체외성숙 배양 24, 48, 96 시간 체외배양하여 핵 성숙율을 확인한 결과 MI∼MII까지의 성숙율이 8.3% (6/72), 8.9% (9/101), 9.5% (8/84)로 체외배양 시간을 96시간까지 연장하여도 성숙률이 증가하지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bolamba D, Russ KD, Olson MA, Sandler JL and Durrant BS. 2002. In vitro maturation of bitch oocytes from advanced preantral follicles in synthetic oviduct fluid medium: serum is not essential. Theriogenology, 58: 1689-1703 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01080-4
  2. Didion BA, Pomp D, Martin MJ, Homanics GE and Markert CL. 1990. Observations on the cooling and cryopreservation of pig oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage. J. Anim. Sci., 68:2803-2810 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892803x
  3. Garner DL, Pinkel D, Johnson LA and Pace MM. 1986. Assessment of spermatozoa function us-ing dual fluorescent staining and flow cytome-tric analyses. BioI. Reprod., 34:127-138 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod34.1.127
  4. Hewitt DA and England GC. 1998. The effect of oocyte size and bitch age upon oocyte nuclear maturation in vitro. 1998. Theriogenology, 49:957-966 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00044-2
  5. Mastromonaco GF, Hay MA and Goodrowe KL. 2002. The effects of oocyte storage and cumulus cell presence on canine zona penetration by domestic dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 57:1123-1134 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00685-9
  6. Mohr LR and Trounson AO. 1981. Structural changes associated with freezing of bovine embryos. BioI. Reprod., 25:1009-1025 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod25.5.1009
  7. Neidle Sand Cutbush SD. 1983. X-ray crysta-llographic analysis of (+/ -) -7 beta,8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 beta, 10 beta-epoxy-7, 8, 9, 10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene: molecular structure of a 'syn' diol epoxide. Carcinogenesis, 4:415-418 https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/4.4.415
  8. Renton JP, Boyd JS, Eckersall PD, Ferguson JM, Harvey MJ, Mullaney J and Perry B. 1991. Ovulation, fertilization and early embryonic development in the bitch (Canis famiJiaris). J. Reprod. Fertil., 93:221-231 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0930221
  9. Rodrigues BA and Rodrigues JL. 2003. Meiotic response of in vitro matured canine oocytes under different proteins and heterologous hor-mone supplementation. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 38:58-62 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00404.x
  10. Saint-Dizier M, Renard JP and Chastant-Maillard S. 2001. Induction of final maturation by sperm penetration in canme oocytes. Reproduction, 121:97-105 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210097
  11. SAS. 1999. User's Guide : Statics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
  12. Shigeki A and Yasuo S. 1993. Effect of tempe-rature during transportation of ovaries on the development of bovine oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. Anim. Sci. Technol., 64:32-37
  13. Solano R, de Armas R, Pupo CA and Castro FO. 1994. Short-term preservation of intrafollicu1ar oocytes at 4^{\circ}C. Theriogenology, 41:299 (abstract) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80209-2
  14. Toner M, Cravalho EG, Ebert KM and Overstrom EW. 1986. Cryobiophysical properties of porcine embryos. Biol. Reprod. (suppl 1)., 34:98 (abstract)
  15. Yang NS and Lu KH. 1990. In vitro fertilization (lVF) and culture (lVC) of bovine oocytes from stored ovaries. Theriogenology, 33:352 (abstract) https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90776-P
  16. 김민규, 김혜진, 조종기, 장구, 이규승, 강성근, 이병천, 황우석. 2002. 개의 발정주기가 난자의 체외성숙에 미치는 영향. 한국수정란이식학회지, 17:219-225
  17. 이효상, 윤회준, 이영호, 강태영, 공일근, 2003. 성숙배양액과 단백질이 개 미성숙 난자의 체외성숙에 미치는 영향. 한국수정란 이식화학지, 18:75-80