광 버스트 스위칭망에서 최소 대역폭 보장

Minimum Bandwidth Guarantee for Optical Burst Switching Networks

  • 오승훈 (숭실대학교 정보통신전자공학부) ;
  • 김영한 (숭실대학교 정보통신전자공학부)
  • 발행 : 2003.10.01

초록

본 논문에서는 다수 트래픽 클래스들에게 최소 대역폭을 보장해 줄 수 있는 광버스트스위칭 (Optical Burst Switching, OBS) 기법을 제안한다. 현재까지 제안되었던 QoS (Quality of Service) 관련 OBS 기법들은 클래스간 차별화는 가능하였으나 여러 클래스들이 존재하는 경우 하위 우선순위의 트래픽 클래스는 상급 클래스와 충돌로 최소 대역폭을 보장해 주진 못 하였다. 본 논문에서는 클래스별로 데이터 채널의 일정 시간구간을 할당하여, 최소한 그 영역에서는 최상급 클래스보다도 높은 우선순위를 부여하여 최소 대역폭을 보장받도록 하였다. 이런 동작을 효율적으로 가능하게 하기 위해서 새로운 버스트 어셈블리 알고리즘과, 데이터 채널의 시간영역을 관리방법을 제안한다. 또한 제안된 기법의 단대단 지연시간과 성능을 시뮬레이션을 통해 검증하였다.

We propose the novel optical burst switching scheme to guarantee a minimum bandwidth for multiple classes. To date, QoS studies on OBS network are capable of differentiating two classes, but have difficulties in providing a minimum bandwidth lot several classes because of lower classes' collision with the highest class bursts in the networks. To solve that problem, in our proposed scheme we assign time zones in a data channel for each class periodically, making one burst have top priority at least its zone. Also, the new burst assembling algorithm, as well as the way of managing data channel, is necessarily proposed to coordinate with the proposed OBS scheme. Through the evaluation, we show that the worst-case end-to-end delay is small enough and the received bandwidth of the lower classes is still assured regardless of the traffic load of the highest class.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Vinod Vokkarane, Karthik Haridoss, and Jason Jue, 'Threshold-Based Burst Assembly Policies for QoS Support in Optical Burst-Switched Networks,' Proceedings, SPIE Optical Networking and Communication Conference (Opti-Comm) 2002, Boston, MA, vol. 4874, pp. 125-136, July 2002 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.475291
  2. Chunming Qiao, 'Labeled Optical Burst Switching for IP-over-WDM Integration,' IEEE Commun. Mag., Sep. 2000, pp. 104-114 https://doi.org/10.1109/35.868149
  3. F. L. Faucheur and W. Lai, 'Requirements for support of Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering,' Internet Draft, draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-reqts-07.txt, Feb. 2003
  4. S. Oh, Y. Kim, M Yoo, H. Hong, 'Survivability in the Optical Internet Using the Optical Burst Switching,' ETRI J., vol. 24, no. 2, Apr. 2002, pp. 117-130 https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.02.0402.0205
  5. S. Blake et al., 'An Architecture for Differentiated Sendee,' IETF RFC 2475, Dec. 1998
  6. X.Wang, H. Morikawa, and T. Aoyama, 'Deflection routing protocol for burst switching WDM mesh networks,' in Proc. SPIE/IEEE Terabit Optical Networking: Architecture, Control, and Management Issues, Nov. 2000, pp. .242-252 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.402548
  7. M Yoo, C. Qiao and S. Dixit, 'Optical Burst Switching for Service Differentiation in the Next Generation Optical Internet,' IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 2, Feb. 2001, pp.98-104 https://doi.org/10.1109/35.900637
  8. Y. Chen, M Hamdi, and D.H.K Tsang, 'Proportional QoS over OBS networks,' in Proc. IEEE Globecom'02, vol. 3, pp. 1510-1514 https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2001.965833
  9. S. Verma, H. Chaskar, and R. Ravikanth, 'Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone,' IEEE Network, vol. 14, no. 6, Nov. 2000, pp. 48-53 https://doi.org/10.1109/65.885670
  10. Ge, F. Callgati, and L. S. Tamil, 'On Optical Burst Switching and Self-Similar Traffic,' IEEE Commun. Letters, vol. 4, no. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 98-100 https://doi.org/10.1109/4234.831037