Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

Interpersonal Tie and Internet Dependency

인적 유대와 인터넷 의존

  • Published : 2003.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The reciprocal relationship between the interpersonal tie and the internet dependency is focused in the study. Mainly, chi-squire test and ANOVA are used in testing the hypothesized relationship of the internet dependency with the interpersonal tie before and after using internet. The strong relationship with the internet dependency is found in internet's both-directional communicating function such as chatting, game, gambling, etc. The level of internet dependency is high when individual's tie with friends, colleagues, or neighbors is strong; but it is lower when individual's emotional tie with family members is stronger. It is confirmed that excessive usage of internet damages family relationship. Conversely, it is also clear that the emotional support from family members is essential for preventing or enhancing internet dependency. This implies that internet dependency is not an individual problem, but that it should be treated under the consideration of his/her family system.

Keywords

References

  1. 김주한(1996). 인터넷 신드롬. 과학동아 1996. 9. 게재내용.(http://plaza.snu.ac.kr/-psyber/internet.htm)
  2. 박경호(2002). '국내 인터넷-컴퓨터 사이버 중독 실태 조사' 보고서，정보통신부.(http://www.intemetaddiction.or.kr/7Data_Research_View.asp?ID=1174&PageNum=l&BBSType=DataResearch&SearchString = &SearchKey=)
  3. 박부진, 이해영(2000). 대학생의 인터넷 이용특성과가족생활의 변화. 가족과 문화, 12(2), 99-126
  4. 송명준, 권정혜(2000). 대학생의 인터넷 중독 현황 및 인터넷 중독이 대학생활 적응에 미치는영향 (2000 한국임상심리학회 하계학술대회포스터 발표)
  5. 송원영(1998). 자기효능감과 자기통제력이 인터넷의중독적 사용에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문
  6. 송인덕(1999),온라인 중독증 개념의 타당성 검증연구. 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구 논문
  7. 유승호, 신영철, 정의준(2001). 게임 몰입증의 현황과대처방안. 문화관광부 (http:/ /www .internetaddiction.or.kr/7Data_Research.asp)
  8. 윤영민(2000) 인터넷 시대에 있어 청소년 문제와대책. 서울: 청소년보호위원회
  9. 이봉건(1999). 사이버공간에서의 중독-통신 . 인터넷중독증의 증상과 예방. '사이버공간의 심리:인간적 정보화 사회를 향해서'(313-332) 서울. 박영사
  10. 이시형,이세용,김은정,오승근(2002). 청소년의 인터넷 중독과 자녀교육. 연구보고서. 삼성생명공익재단 사회정신건강연구소.)(http://www. intemetaddiction.or.kr/7Data_ Research_ View.asp?ID=1173&PageNum= l&BBSType=DataResearch&SearchString=&SearchKey=)
  11. 이해영(1999). 인터넷 이용 현황 및 이용자 연구: 한국. 미국 . 영국의 조사 결과 비교 분석. 정보관리연구,30(2), 1-19
  12. 이해영(2000). 여성의 인터넷 이용 현황 및 특성. 명지대학교 여성 . 가족생활 연구소. 여성 . 가족생활연구,5, 41-71
  13. 이해영,이여봉(2001). 이메일 활용과 가족 관계 가족과 문화,13(2), 107-135
  14. 정보통신부，한국전산원(2000). 인터넷: 인터넷 이용현황 - 인터넷 이용률. 정보화통계 분석 DB.(http://WW.nca.or.kr/homepage/stat/stat.nsf)
  15. 한국 인터넷정보센터(2001). 인터넷 이용자수 및 이용 행태 조사 요약 결과보고서. 한국 인터넷정보센터,(주)인터넷 메트릭스 2001. (http://www.intemetmetrix.com/htm4$_{}$1/pdf/census_5.pdf)
  16. 한규석(1999). 사이버사회에서의 의사소통과 교류행위 '사이버공간의 심리: 인간적 정보화 사회를 향해서'(30-65). 서울 박영사
  17. Baker, A.(2002). What makes an online relationshipsuccessful? Clues from couples who met in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior,S, 363-375
  18. Beard, Keith W (2002). Current Status and implications for employees. Journal of Employment Counseling; Alexandria; Mar 2002
  19. Boneva, B., & Kraut, R (2002). Email, gender, and personal relationships. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life (pp. 372-403). Malden, MA: Blackwell
  20. DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) Fourth Edition (1994). American Psychiatric Association
  21. Forsyth, D. K.(1983). An interaction to group dynamics. Moterey, CA: Brooks/cole Publishing Co
  22. Goldberg, I. (1996). Internet addiction. Electronic message posted to research discussion list. World Wide Web. http://www.cmhc.com/mlists / research.html
  23. Griffiths, M. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLIlI. Some commentson addictive use of the internet by Young. Psychological Reports, 80, 81-82 https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.80.1.81-82
  24. Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (2002). The not so global village of netville. In B. Wellman, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life, (pp. 345-371). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  25. Kennedy-Souza, B. L. (1998). Internet addiction disorder. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6(1-2). WorldWide Web. http://janucc.nau.edu/-ipct-j 1998/nl-2/kennedy-souza.html
  26. Kiesler, S.,& Kraut, R (1999). Internet use and ties that binds - Reply to comments. American Psychologist, 54(9),783-784 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.783
  27. King, S. A. (1995). Effects of mood states on social judgments in cyberspace: self focused sad people as the source of flame wars. World Wide Webhttp://www.grohol.com/storm1.htm
  28. KNP (Korea Netizen Profile) Survey -인터넷 사용자 조사보고서(2000년 하반기) (사)한국광고단체 연합회, IMResearch. 2000.12.8.(Hhttp://knp.adic.co.kr/)
  29. Kraut, R, Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
  30. Kraut, R, Kiesler., S., Boneva, B., Cummings, L Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00248
  31. McKenna, K. Y. A, Green, A.S., & Gleason, M. E. J.(2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246
  32. Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3),420-435 https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957277
  33. Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, 1. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: a time diary study. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in Everyday Life. 215-243. Malden, MA: Blackwell
  34. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1991). The truth about addiction and recovery: The life process program for outgrowing destructive habits. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster
  35. Sanders, C. E., T. M. Field, M. Diego, and M. Kaplan (2000). The relationship of internet use to depression and social isolation among adlolescents, Adolescence, 35(138), 237-242
  36. SIQSS(Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society). (2000. 2. 16) Internet and society study. World Wide Web http://www. stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/inter netStudy.html
  37. Suler, J.R. (1996). Why is this thing eating my life? Computer and cyberspace addiction at the 'palace'. World Wide Web http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/eatlife.html
  38. Tsai, C. C. & Lin, S. S. J. (2001). Analysis of attitudes toward computer networks and internet addiction of Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 373-376 https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210277
  39. Van Gelder, L. (1996). The strange case of the electronic lover. In R. Kling, (Ed.), Computerization and controversy. 533-546. San Diego,CA : Academic Press.
  40. Wellman, B. (1996, January). An electronic group is virtually a social network. To appear in Sara Kiesler, ed., Research Milestones on the Information Highway. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  41. Young, K. (1996). Internet can be as addicting as alcohol, drugs and gambling, says new research, A APA news release available at http://www.apa.org/releases/internet.html. Reporting on; Presentation: Pathological Internet Use: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. by Kimberly S Young, Psy. D., University of Pittsburgh at Bradford, Session 2127, 11:00-11:50 AM, Saturday, August 10, 1996, Metro Toronto Convention Centre, ExhibitHall. Center for Online Addiction