DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EFFECT OF SALIVARY CONTAMINATION OF TEETH ON MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF VAR10US DENTIN BONDING SYSTEMS.

타액에 의한 오염이 상아질 접착제의 미세전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Ryu, Gil-Joo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 류길주 (경희대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2003.05.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of salivary contamination of teeth on bonding efficacy of self-priming and self-etching DBSs. The materials used were Single Bond(SB, self-priming system, 3M), Unifil Bond(UB, self-etching system, GC), and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(SM, 3M) as control. Forty five human molars randomly allocated to three groups as dentin bonding systems tested and embedded in epoxy resin. Then the specimens were wet-ground to expose flat buccal enamel surface or flat occlusal dentin surface and cut bucco-lingually to form two halves with slow speed diamond saw. One of them was used under non-contamination, other under contamination with saliva. The bonding procedure was according to the manufacturer's directions and resin composite(Z-100, 3M Dental Products, St. Paul, MN) was built-up on the bonded surface 5mm high. The specimens were ground carefully at the enamel-composite interface with fine finishing round diamond bur to create an hour-glass shape yielding bonded surface areas of $1.5{\pm}0.1\textrm{mm}^2$. The specimens were bonded to the modified microtensile testing apparatus with cyanoacrylate, attached to the universal testing machine and stressed in tension at a CHS of 1mm/min. The tensile force at failure was recorded and converted to a tensile stress(MPa). Mean values and standard deviations of the bond strength are listed in table. One-way ANOVA was used to determine significant difference at the 95% level. The bond strength of SBMP and SB were not affected by salivary contamination, but that of UB was significantly affected by salivary contamination. These results indicate that DBSs with total etch technique seems less likely affected by salivary contamination in bonding procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore MG: A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 34:849-853. 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Buonocore MG: Retrospections on bonding. DCNA, 25(2) :241-255. 1981
  3. Prati C. Pahsley DH and Montanari G: Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater. 7:54-58. 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90028-W
  4. Perinka L. Sano Hand Hosoda H: Dentin thickness. hardness. and Ca+ concentration vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 8:229-233. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90090-Y
  5. Bowen RL: Bonding of restorative materials to dentine: the present status in the United States. Int Dent J. 35:155-159,1985
  6. Asmussen E: Clinical relevance of physical. chemical. and bonding properties of composite resins. Oper Dent. 10:61-73.1985
  7. Johnson GH. Powell LV and Gordon GE: Dentin bonding systems: a review of current products and techniques. JADA. 122: 34-41. 1991
  8. Pashley DH. Sano H. Ciucchi B. Yoshiyama M and Carvalho RM: Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater. 11: 117-125. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  9. Sano H. Shono T. Sonoda H. Takatsu T. Ciucchi B. Carvalho R and Pashley DH: Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 10:236-240. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  10. Griffith AA: The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans Roy Soc London. A221: 168-198. 1920
  11. Hormati AA. Fuller JL and Denehy GE: Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. JADA. 100: 34-38. 1980 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0033
  12. Thompson JL. Main C. Gillespie FC and Stephen KW: The effect of salivary contamination on fissure sealant-enamel bond strength. J Oral Rehabi. 8: 11-18. 1981 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00470.x
  13. Silverstone LM. Hicks MJ and Featherstone MJ: Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. JADA. 110:329-332. 1985 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0350
  14. Barghi N. Knight GT and Berry TG: Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel : a clinical study. Oper Dent. 16: 130-135. 1991
  15. Pashley EL. Tao L. Mackert JR and Pashley DH: Comparison of in vivo vs. in vitro bonding of composite resin to the dentin of canine teeth. J Dent Res. 67(2) :467-70. 1988 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670020601
  16. Johnson ME. Burgess JO, Hermesch CB and Buikema DJ: Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 19(6) :205-210. 1994
  17. Fritz UB. Finger WJ and Stean H: Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system. Quintessence Int. 29(9): 567-72. 1998
  18. Hansen EK and Munksgaard EC: Saliva contamination vs. efficacy of dentin-bonding agents. Dent Mater. 5(5): 329-33. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90125-5
  19. Hitmi L. Attal JP and Degrange M: Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 1:219-232. 1999