DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE ANALYSIS OF INITIAL APICAL FILE SIZE BEFORE AND AFTER CORONAL FLARING

Coronal flaring 전, 후 초기근관장 파일크기의 분석

  • Hwang, Ho-Keel (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Bae, Seong-Chul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Oral Biology Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 황호길 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 박찬호 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 배성철 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 구강생물학연구소)
  • Published : 2003.01.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial apical file(IAF) first Ole that fits to the apex in each canal before and after early flaring to analyze if the size of file to fit to the apex would increase after flaring. Eighty anterior teeth with complete apical formation and patent foramens were selected. The samples were randomly divided into 4 groups(GG, OS, GT, PT Group) of 20 teeth each. A file was fit to the apex in each canal and that size recorded. Radicular flaring were completed using different types of instruments. After flaring a file was again fit to the apex in the same manner as before and its size recorded. The results of this study were as follows : 1. The mean diameter of IAF before flaring(file diameters in $mm{\times}10^{-2}$) was $19.81{\pm}8.32$ before and $25.94{\pm}9.21$ after(p<0.05). 2. The increase in diameter of IAF was approximately one file size for all groups. 3. Ranking of increasing diameter of IAF were GG>CT>OS>PT group. There was a statistically significant difference between before and after flaring(p<0.05). 4 Ranking of the time for flaring were GG>GT>OS>PT group. There was a statistically significant difference between GG group and other groups(p<0.05). 5. In the case without change of IAF diameter, they showed decrease in force after flaring when IAF was pulled out from root canal(p<0.05). This study suggested that early radicular flaring increases the file size that is snug at the apex, and awareness of that difference gives the clinician a better sense of canal size. Early flaring of the canal provides better apical size information and with this awareness, a better decision can be made concerning the appropriate final diameter needed for complete apical shaping.

Keywords

References

  1. Cohen S and Burns R : Pathways of the pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis: Cv Mosby, 179-218, 1994
  2. 임성삼 : {임상근관치료학}, 2판, 서울: 의치학사. pp.128-136, 1999.
  3. Grossman L : Endodontic practice, 10th ed. Philadelphia:Lea & Febiger, 207. 1985
  4. Weine FS : Endodontic therapy, 3rd. ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co., 256-340, 1982
  5. Ingle J and Bakland L : Endodontics, 4th ed. Philadelphia:Lea & Febiger, 92-227, 1994
  6. Oliet Sand Sorin SM : Cutting efficiency of endodontic remers, Oral Surg., 36:243, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90246-6
  7. Walton Rand Torabinejad M : Principles and practice of endodontics. 1st ed. Philadelphia, USA:WB Saunders Co.. 189-190, 1989
  8. Leeb J : Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation, J. Endod., 9:463-470, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80160-5
  9. Goerig AC. Michelich RJ and Schultz HH : Instrumentation of root canals in molar using the step-down technique. J. Endod., 8:550-554. 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80015-0
  10. Morgan LF and Montgomery S : An evaluation of the crown-down pressureless technique, J. Endod., 10:491-498, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80207-1
  11. Fava LRG : The double-flared technique: an alternative for biomechanical preparation, J. Endod., 9:76-80, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80080-6
  12. Abou-Rass M, Jastrab RJ : The use of rotary instruments as auxiliary aids to root canal preparation of molars, J. Endod., 8:78-82, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80262-8
  13. Isom T, Marshall JG and Baumgartner JC : Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring, J. Endod., 21: 368-371, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80972-6
  14. Contreras MAL, Zinman EH and Kaplan SK : Comparison of the First File that Fits at the Apex, Before and After Early Flaring, J. Endod., 27:113-116,2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200102000-00014
  15. Musikant BL, Cohen BI and Deutsch AS : The evolution of instrumentation and obturation leading to as simplified approach, Compendium, 21:980-990, 2000
  16. Kessler JR, Peters DD and Lorton S: Comparision of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques, J. Etidod., 9:439-447, 1983
  17. Al-Omari MAO and Dummer PMH : Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques, J, Endod., 21: 154-158, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80443-7
  18. Coldero LG, McHugh S, MacKenzie D and Saunders WP : Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement, Int. Endod. J., 35:437-446, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00496.x
  19. Fogarty TJ and Montgomery S : Effect of preflaring on canal transportation, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 72:345-350, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90231-Z
  20. Lambrianidis T, Tosounidou E and Tzoanopoulou M : The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion, J. Endod., 27:696-698, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200111000-00011
  21. Swindle RB, Neaverth EJ, Pantera EA and Ringle RD : Effect of coronal- radicular flaring on apical transportation, J. Endod., 17:147-149, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)82006-6
  22. Rollison S, Barnett F and Stevens RH: Efficacy of bacterial removal from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instrumentation technique and size, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Path. Oral Radio. & Endo., 94: 366-371, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.126164
  23. Davis R, Marshall JG and Baumgartner JC : Effect of early coronal flaring on working length change in curved canals using rotary nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instruments, J. Endod., 28 :438-442, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200206000-00005
  24. Gluskin AH. Brown DC and Buchanan LS: A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators, Int. Endod. J., 34:476-484, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x
  25. Tan BT and Messer HH : The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size, J. Endod., 28:658-664, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200209000-00008
  26. Roane JB, Sabala CL and Duncanson MG : The 'Balanced Force' concept for instrumentation of curved canals, J. Endod., 11: 203-211, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80061-3
  27. Goldberg F and Massone EJ : Patency file and apical transportation: An in vitro study, J. Endod., 28:510-511, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00005
  28. Gani O and Visvisian C : Apical canal diameter in the first upper molar at various ages, J. Endod., 25:689-691, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80357-4
  29. Fuge KN, Stuck AMC and Love RM : A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments, Int. Endod. J., 31:123-126, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00128.x