A Study on Sex Role Identity and Makeup Behavior

여대생(女大生)의 성역할(性役割) 정체감(正體感)과 화장(化粧) 행동(行動)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)

  • 구자명 (안산공과대학 뷰티디자인과) ;
  • 이구영 (안산공과대학 뷰티디자인과)
  • Published : 2002.06.30

Abstract

This objective study were to classify the contents of makeup behavior, to investigate the relationship between makeup behavior and sex role identity, and to examine how the makeup behavior, makeup satisfaction was influenced by sex role identity and demographics. To achieve this, the researchers surveyed 162 women for the ages of 18 through 25. The result of this study are followed. 1) Four factor of makeup behavior were sexual attractiveness, aesthetic, psychological dependence and makeup interest. 2) There were significant positive relationship between makeup behavior and sex role identity. 3) Sexual attractiveness were influenced by femininity, income. The explanatory power of the 2 variables were 8.5%. Aesthetic were influenced by masculinity. The explanatory power of the 1 variable was 9.2%. Psychological dependence were influenced by femininity. The explanatory power of the 1 variable was 8.2%. Makeup interest were influenced by masculinity, age. The explanatory power of the 2 variables were 9.0%. 4 Makeup satisfaction were influenced by sexual attractiveness, aesthetic. The explanatory power of the 2 variables were 22.1%.

Keywords

References

  1. Bem, S. L., The Measurement of Psychology Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42-2, 1974, pp. 155-162 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
  2. 전선정 . 안현경 . 이귀영 . 문윤경, 미용미학과 미용문화사, 서울: 청구문화사, 2001, p. 15
  3. Cox, C. L. and Glick, W. H., Resume Evaluations and Cosmetics Use : When More is not Better, Sex Roles, 14-1, 1986, pp. 51-58 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287847
  4. Miller, L. C. and Cox, C. L. , For Appearance Sake: Public Self-Consciousness and Make Up Use, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 1982. pp. 748-751 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282084023
  5. Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen M. and Galumbeck, C., Effects of Cosmetics Use on the Physical Attractiveness and Body Image of American College Women, The Journal of Social Psychology, 129-3, 1989, pp. 349-355
  6. Theberge, L. and Kernaleguen, A., Importance of Cosmetics Related to Aspects of the Self, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1979, pp. 827-830 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1979.48.3.827
  7. Cash, T. F., Rissi, J. and Chapman, R., Not just Another Prettyface: Sex roles, Locus of Control, and Cosmetic Use, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1985, pp. 246-257 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285113002
  8. Hamid, P. N., Some Effects of Dress Cues on Observational Accuracy, a Perceptual Estimate, and Impression Formation, The Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 1972, pp. 279-289 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1972.9918629
  9. Graham, J. A. and Jouhar, A. J., The Effects of Cosmetics on Personal Perception, International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 3, 1981, pp. 199-201
  10. Graham, J. A. and Furnham, A., Sexual Differences in Attractiveness Rating of Day/Night Cosmetic Use, Cosmetic Technology, August, 1981, pp. 36-42
  11. Osborn, D. R., Beauty is as Beauty Does? Makeup and Posture Effects on Physical Attractiveness Judgments, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26-1, 1996, pp. 31-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01837.x
  12. 이연희, 유행예측색에 의한 색채화장이 얼굴 이미지 지각에 미치는 영향, 박사학위논문, 성신여자대학교 대학원, 2000
  13. Workman, J. E. and Johnson, K. K. P., The Role of Cosmetics in Impression Formation, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10-1, 1991, pp. 63-67 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9101000109
  14. Workman, J. E. and Johnson, K. K. P., The Role of Cosmetics in Attributions about Sexual Harassment, Sex Roles, 24, 1991, pp. 759-769 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288211
  15. 윤소영, 메이크업과 헤어스타일이 인상형성에 미치는 영향, 석사학위논문, 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원, 2001
  16. 김현희, 여고생의 화장행동과 화장품 구매불안간의 관계, 석사학위논문, 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원, 2001
  17. Block, J. M., Conceptions of Sex Roles : Some Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Perspectives, American Psychologist, 28, 1973, pp. 512-526
  18. Hurlock, E. B., Personality Development, New York : McGraw- Hill, Inc., 1974, p. 311
  19. Broverman, I, K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S. and Vogel, S. R., Sex Role Stereotypes and Clinical Judgements of Mental Health, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34-1, 1970, pp. 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028797
  20. Harris, A., Ethnicity as a Determinants of Sex Role Identity :A Replication Study of Item Selection for the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Sex Roles, 31, 1994, pp. 241-273 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547717
  21. Auster, C. J. and Ohm, S, C., Masculinity and Feminity in Contemporary American Society: A Reevaluation Using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Sex Roles, 43, 2000, pp. 499-528 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007119516728
  22. Bem, S. L., On the Utility of Alternative Procedure for Assessing psychology Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45-2, 1977, pp. 196-205 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196
  23. Bem, S. L. and Lenney, E., Sex -Typing and the Avoidance of Cross-Sex Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33-1, 1976, pp. 48-54 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078640
  24. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. and Stapp, J., Rating of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conception of Masculinity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32-1, 1975, pp. 29-39 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076857
  25. 김선영, 우리나라 고등학생의 양성적 성역할 정체감과 자아실현성 및 도덕성 발달과의 관계, 석사학위논문, 고려대학교 대학원, 1987
  26. 김광숙 . 조진아 . 전연숙 . 이현주, The make up, 서울: 도서출판 예림, 2001, p. 11
  27. 조기여, 자기효능감, 퍼스널 스페이스, 의복근접도, 화장근접도와의 관계, 박사학위논문, 대구효성카톨릭대학교 대학원, 1997
  28. 이명희, 예의 . 정숙성과 심미성을 중심으로 한 대학생의 의복행동과 관련된 심리적 변인 연구, 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 1983
  29. 김윤정, 남자 대학생의 유행선도력 및 성역할 정체감에 따른 의복행동 연구, 석사학위논문, 고려대학교 대학원, 1992