Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Comparative study on tissue responses of 3 resorbable membranes in rats

흡수성 차폐막의 조직반응에 관한 비교연구

  • Hong, Seung-Bum (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Man-Sup (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Herr, Yeek (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 홍승범 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이만섭 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2002.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate histologically the resorption and tissue response of various resorbable collagen membranes used for guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration, using a subcutaneous model on the dorsal surface of the rat. In this study, 10 Sprague-Dawley male rats (mean BW 150gm) were used and the commercially available materials included acellular dermal matrix allograft, porcine collagen membrane, freeze-dried bovine dura mater. Animals were sacrificed at 2,6 and 8 weeks after implantation of various resorbable collagen membranes. Specimens were prepared with Hematoxylin-Eosin stain for light microscopic evaluation. The results of this study were as follows: 1. Resorption : Inner portion of porcine collagen membrane was resorbed a lot at 6 weeks, but its function was being kept for infiltration of another tissues were not observed. Freeze-dried bovine dura mater and acellular dermal allograft were rarely resorbed and kept their structure of outer portion for 8 weeks. 2. Inflammatory reactions : Inflammatory reaction was so mild and foreign body reaction didn't happen in all of resorbable collagen membranes, which showed their biocompatibility. 3. In all of resorbable collagen membranes, multinuclcated giant cells by foreign body reactions were not observed. Barrier membranes have to maintain their function for 4-6 weeks in guided tissue regeneration and at least 8 weeks in guided bone regeneration. According to present study, we can find all of the resorbable collagen membranes kept their function and structure for 8 weeks and were rarely resorbed. Foreign body reaction didn't happen and inflammatory reaction was so mild histologically. Therefore, all of collagen membranes used in this experiment were considered proper resorbable membranes for guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration.

Keywords

References

  1. Melcher, A. H. : On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J. Periodontol., 47 : 256-260, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.5.256
  2. Caton, J., Nyman, S., and Zander, H. : Histometric evaluation of periodontal surgery. II. Connective tissue attachment levels after four regenerative procedures. J. Clin. Periodontol., 7 : 224-231, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01965.x
  3. Nyman, S., Gottlow, J., Karring, T., and Lindhe, J. : Healing following implantation of periodontitis- affected roots into gingival connective tissue. J. Clin. Periodontol., 7: 394-401, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb02012.x
  4. Nyman, S., Karring, T., and Lindhe, J. : The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey. J. Clin. Periodontol., 9 : 257-265, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02065.x
  5. Gottlow, J., Nyman, S., Lindhe, F., Karring, T., and Wennstrom, J. : New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports. J. Clin, Periodontol., 13 : 604-616, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00854.x
  6. Blumenthal, N. M. : A clinical comparison of collagen membranes with e-PTFE membranes in the treatment of human mandibular buccal class II furcation defects. J. Periodontol., 64 : 925-933, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.10.925
  7. Becker, W., Becker, B., and Berg, L. : New attachment after treatment with root isolation procedure: report for treated ClassIII and Class II furcations and vertical osseous defects. Int. J. Periodont. Res. Dent., 8 : 2-16, 1988
  8. Pontoriero, R., Lindhe, J., Nyman, S., Karring, T., Rosenberg, E., and Samavi, F. : Guided tissue regeneration in degree II furcation-involved mandibular molar. A Clinical study. J. Clin, Periodontol., 15 : 247-254, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01578.x
  9. Handelsman, M., Davarpanah, M., and Celletti, R. : Guided tissue regeneration with and without citric acid treatment in vertical osseous defects. Int. J. Periodont. Res. Dent, 11 : 350-363, 1991
  10. Becker, W., and Becker, B. : Treatment of mandibular 3-wall intrabony defects by flap debridement and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes. Long term evaluation of 32 treated patients. J. Periodontol., 64 : 1138-1144, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1138
  11. Peleg. M., Chaushu, G., Blinder, D., and Taicher, S. : Use of lyodura for bone augmentation of osseous defects around dental implants. J. Periodontol., 70 : 853-860, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.853
  12. McGinnis, M., Larsen, P., Miloro, M., and Beck, F. M. : Comparision of resorbable and nonresorbable guided bone regeneration materials: A preliminary study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 13 : 30-35, 1998
  13. Dahlin, C., Lindhe, A., Gottlow, J., and Nyman, S. : Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast. Reconstr, Surg., 81 : 672-676, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004
  14. Zitzmann, N. U., Naef, R., and Scharer, P. : Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 12 : 844-852, 1997
  15. Bunyaratavej, P., and Wang, H. L. : Collagen membranes: A review. J. Periodontol., 72 : 215-229, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.215
  16. Wang, H. L., MacNeil, R. L., Shieh, A.T., and O'Neal, R. B. : Utilization of a resorbable collagen membrane in repairing gingival recession defects. Pract, Periodont. Aesthet. Dent., 8 : 441-448, 1996
  17. Lowenberg, B. F., Aubin. J. E., and Deporter, D. A. : Attachment, migration, and orientation of human gingival fibroblasts to collagen-coated, surface demineralized, and untreated root slices. J. Dent. Res., 64 : 1106-1110, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640090101
  18. Steinberg, A. D., Lebreton, G., and Willey, R. : Extravascular clot formation and platelet activation on variously treated root surfaces. J. Periodontol., 57 : 516-522, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1986.57.8.516
  19. Iglhaut. J., Aukhil, I., Simpson, D. M.,Johnston, M. C., and Koch, G. : Progenitor cell kineticsM during guided tissue regeneration in experimental periodontal wounds. J. Periodont. Res., 23: 107-117, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1988.tb01342.x
  20. Karring, T., Nyman, S., Lindhe, J., and Sirirat, M. : Potentials for root resorption during periodontal wound healing. J. Clin, Periodontol., 11 : 41-52,1984 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb01307.x
  21. Fleisher, N., Waal, H. D., and Bloom, A. :Regeneration of lost attachment apparatus in the dog using vicryl absorbable mesh (Polyglactin 910). Int. J. Periodont. Res. Dent., 8 : 45-55, 1988
  22. Dahlin, C., Lindhe, A., Gottlow, J., and Nyman, S. : Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast, Reconstr. Surg., 81 : 672-676, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004
  23. Blumenthal, N. M. : The use of collagen membranes for guided tissue regeneration. Compend. Contino Educ, Dent., 13 : 214-222, 1992
  24. Gottlow, J. : Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and nonresorbable devices : Initial healing and long term results. J. Periodontol., 64 : 1157-1165, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1157
  25. Zellin, G., Gritli-Linde, A., and Linde, A. : Healing of mandibular defects with different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes : An experimental study in rats. Biomaterials., 16: 601-609, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)93857-A
  26. Minabe, M. : A critical review of the biologic rationale for guided tissue regeneration. J. Periodontol., 62: 171-179, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.3.171
  27. Fowler, E. B., Breault, L. G., and Rebitski, G. : Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: Part 1. A report of 2 cases. J. Periodontol., 71 : 1353-1359, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.8.1353
  28. Silverstein,L. H., and Callan, D. P, : An acellular dermal matrix allograft substitutefor palatal donor tissue. Post. Grad. Dentistry, 3(4) : 14-21, 1997
  29. Callan, D. P, : Use of acellular dermal matrix allograft material in dental implant treatment. Dent. Surg. Products, 1 : 14-17, 1996.
  30. Harris, R. J. : Root coverage with a connective tissue with a partial thickness double pedicle graft and acellular dermal matrix graft: a clinical and histological evaluation of a case report. J. Periodontol., 69 : 1305-1311, 1998
  31. Fowler, E. B., Breault, L. G., and Rebitski, G. : Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: Part II. Immediate endosseous implantplacement. J. Periodontol., 71 : 1360-1364, 2000
  32. Owens, K. W., and Yukna, R. A. : Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent., 10(1) : 49-58, 2001
  33. Hurzeler, M. B., Kohal, R. J., Mota, L., Naghshbandi. J., and Caffesse, R. G. : A new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration (abstract 1225). J. Dent. Res., 76(special issue) : 167, 1997
  34. Kay, S. A. Lynch, L. W., Marxer, M., and Lynch, S. E. : Guided bone regeneration: Integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material. Pract, Periodont, Aesthet, Dent., 9: 185-194, 1997
  35. Camelo, M., Nevins, M. L., Schenk, R. K., Simian, M., Rasperini, G., Lynch, S. E., and Nevins, M. : Clinical, radiographic and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int. J. Periodont. Rest., 18: 321-331, 1998
  36. Zhao, S., Pinholt, E. M., Madsen, J. E., and Donath, K. : Histological evaluation of different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes implanted subcutaneously in rats. J. Craniomax- illofac. Surg., 28(2) : 116-122, 2000
  37. Sewell, W.H., Pate, J. W., and Bedell, W. C. : The Present status of our experiments with freeze-dried grafts. Naval. Med, Res. Inst., 13 : 291, 1956
  38. Hering, H. J. : Replacement of oral mucosa by lyophilized dura during intraoral surgical procedures. Med, Mitt., 43 : 205, 1969
  39. Schilli, W. : Replacement of intraoral tissue by lyophilized dura. Med. Mitt., 43 : 211-214, 1969
  40. Zingg, M., Laedrach, K., and Chen, J. : Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures : A review of 1,025 cases. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg., 50 : 778-790, 1992
  41. Martis, C., Lazaridis, N., Karabouta, I., and Trigonidis, G. : Free transplantation of lyophilized dura for vestibuloplasty : A clinical and histolo- gical study. J. Oral Surg., 37 : 646-649, 1979
  42. Busschop, J., and DeBoever, J. : Clinical and histological characteristics of lyophilized allogenic dura meter in periodontalbony defects in humans. : J. Clin, Periodontol., 10 : 399-411, 1983
  43. Nayot, C., and Beagrie, G. S. : An assesment of the biocompatibility of 'lyodura' in oral mucosa of the hamster. J. Periodontol., 49 : 181-188, 1978
  44. Unsal, B., Kurtis, B., Ozcan, G., Ozdemir, A., and Karaoz, E. : An investigation of resorption and tissue reaction after subcutaneous implantation of collagen based membrane material in rats. J. Marmara, Univ, Dent. Fac, 2 : 609-615, 1997