References
- 박준식. 1997. 색인의 평가기준에 관한 분석적 연구. '계명대학교 사회과학논총', 15 : 119-138
- 유사라. 1999. 데이터베이스 정보 품질 평가의 메타분석. '정보관리학회지', 31(1): 157-174
- 이응봉, 조현양, 류범종, 최재황. 2000. 과학기술분야 데이터베이스의 품질향상을 위한 품질평가 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 35(2): 109-132
- 이제환. 2001. 'KERIS 서지 DB의 품질관리를 위한 평가모델 개발 및 개선방안 수립'. '서울': 한국교육학술정보원. KR 2001-12
- 이제환. 1998. '분산체계로 구축된 통합DB의 품질검증 및 개선을 위한 연구'. '대전': 연구개발정보센터
- 이제환. 1996. 'DB 선정 및 품질평가 기준에 관한 연구'. '대전': 연구개발정보센터
- 장혜란. 2000. 데이터베이스 품질평가를 위한 모형 개발: 텍스트 데이터베이스 내용을 중심으로. '정보관리학회지', 17(4): 83-97
- 한국데이터베이스진흥센터. 2000. '데이터베이스 품질평가 항목'. '서울': 동기관
- 한국데이터베이스진흥센터. 1996. '데이터베이스 표준'. '서울': 동기관
- Armstrong, C. 1996. 'Databases: fit for use or fit for us?' Library Management, 17(2): 40-42 https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129610108261
- Armstrong. 1994. ' The centre for information quality management(CIQM): a single ' phone number for all your woes!' Library Technology News, 12(April): 3-5
- Ayres, F. et al. 1994. QUALCAT: automa- tion of quality control in cataloguing. British Library. Research and Deve-lopment Department. BLRD Report 6068
- Basch, R. 1990. 'Measuring the Quality of Data: Report of the Fourth Annual SCOUG Retreat.' Database Searcher, 6(8): 34-45
- Brodie, M. 1980. 'Data quality in infor-mation systems.' Information and Management, 3(6):245-258 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(80)90035-X
- Bolin, M. 2000. 'Catalog design, catalog maintenance, catalog governance.' Library Collections, Acquisitons & Technical Services, 24: 53-63
- Chapman, A. 1994. 'Up Standard: a study of the Quality Records in a Shared Cataloging Database.' Journal of Lib-rarianship and Information Science, 25(4): 201-210
- Doll, W. and T. Gholamreza. 1991. 'The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: Theoretical and metho-dological issues.' MIS Quarterly, 15 (1): 5-10 https://doi.org/10.2307/249429
- Granick, L. 1991. 'Assuring the quality of information dissemination: responsi-bilities of database producers'. Infor-mation Services and Use, 11(3): 117-136 https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-1991-11304
- Harmon, J. 1996. 'The Death of quality cataloging: does it make a difference for library users?' Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22(4): 306-307 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(96)90124-X
- Klingler, T. 1999. 'Sharing the Load: a planning checklist for consortial data- base use.' Journal of Library Ad-ministration, 26(3/4): 91-113 https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v26n03_06
- Large, J. A.(1989). 'Evaluating online and CD-ROM reference sources.' Journal of Librarianship 21(Apr. '89): 87-108 https://doi.org/10.1177/096100068902100201
- Medawar, K. 1995. 'Database Quality: a Literature Review of the past and a plan for the future.' Program-Automated Library and Information Systems, 29(3) : 257-272 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047199
- Oddy, P. 1996. 'Bibliographic standards for the New Age'. Library Review, 45(2): 30-40 https://doi.org/10.1108/00242539610107569
- Thomas, S. 1996. 'Quality in bibliographic control.' Library Trends, 44(3): 491-505
- Wang, R. 1995.' A Frame for Analysis of Data Quality Research'. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(4): 623-640 https://doi.org/10.1109/69.404034
Cited by
- A Study on Quality Evaluation & Improvement of Bibliographic Database vol.34, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2003.34.3.021
- A study on Convergent & Adaptive Quality Analysis using DQnA model vol.5, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.021