Effects of Exposure of Propidium Iodide and Bisbenzimide on Differential Staining of Mouse Blastocysts

마우스 배반포 배의 Differential staining에서 Propidium Iodide와 Bisbenzimide의 노출이 미치는 영향

  • Park, Kee-Sang (Division of Life Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Baek (Division of Life Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Taek-Hoo (Department of OB/Gyn, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Chun, Sang-Sik (Department of OB/Gyn, Kyungpook National University Hospital) ;
  • Song, Hai-Bum (Division of Life Resources, Daegu University)
  • 박기상 (대구대학교 생명자원학부) ;
  • 박성백 (대구대학교 생명자원학부) ;
  • 이택후 (경북대학교병원 산부인과) ;
  • 전상식 (경북대학교병원 산부인과) ;
  • 송해범 (대구대학교 생명자원학부)
  • Published : 2002.12.30

Abstract

Objective: These experiments were conducted to investigate the optimal expose length of propidium iodide (PI) and bisbenzimide on differential staining of mouse blastocysts. Materials and methods: A total 964 blastocysts (early${\sim}$hatched) was exposed to PI (n=831) (group I: $\leq$ 10; II: $11{\sim}15$; III: $16{\sim}20$; IV: $\geq$21 sec) and bisbenzimide (n=133) (group A: $\leq$1; B: $1{\sim}$3; C: $\geq$ 4 hr) in several periods for differential staining. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test with SigmaPlot-2001. P-values < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. Results: In case of PI exposure, differential staining rates were significantly higher (p<0.05) in group I (89.8%) than in any others (group II: 77.6%; III: 29.6%; IV: 22.2%) and higher (p<0.05) in group II than in group III and IV. In case of bisbenzimide exposure, differential staining rates were not statistically differences in three groups (group A: 97.4%; B: 87.8%; C: 93.3%). Conclusion: The differential staining rates of mouse blastocysts are not affected by the exposure length of bisbenzimide. However, blastocysts were exposed to PI with period of shorter than 15 sec show best outcomes of differential staining rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Beddington R. Analysis of tissues fate and prospective potency in the egg cylinder. In Rossant J and Pederson RA. (eds): Experimental approaches to mammalians embryonic development. Cambridge University Press, 1986; 121-47
  2. Lawson KA, Meneses JJ, Pederson RA. Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 1991; 113: 891-911
  3. Fleming TP. A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. Dev BioI 1987; 119: 520-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(87)90055-8
  4. Handyside AH, Hunter S. A rapid procedure for visualising the inner cell mass and trophectoderm nuclei of mouse blastocysts in situ using polynucleotide-specific fluorochromes. J Exp Zool 1984; 231: 429-34 https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402310317
  5. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM. The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation in vitro. Development 1989; 107: 597-604
  6. Iwasaki S, Yoshida N, Ushijima H, Watanabe S, Nakahara T. Morphology and proportion of inner cell mass of bovine blastocysts fertilized in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fert 1990; 90:279-84 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0900279
  7. Mishra A, Seshagiri PB. Successful development in vitro of hamster 8-cell embryos to 'zona-escape' and attached blastocysts: assessment of quality and trophoblast outgrowth. Reprod Fertil Dev 1998; 10: 413-20 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD98100
  8. Papaioannou VE, Ebert KM. The preimplantation pig embryo: cell number and allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass of the blastocyst in vivo andin vitro. Development 1988; 102: 793-803
  9. Thouas GA, Korfiatis NA, French AJ, Jones GM, Trounson AO. Simplified techniques for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online Webpap 2001;3: 25-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61960-8