Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer in Infertile Women with Pelvic Tuberculosis

골반결핵으로 인한 불임 환자에서 체외수정 시술의 결과

  • Kim, Jin-Yeong (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Inn-Soo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Cheil Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 김진영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 산부인과) ;
  • 강인수 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성제일병원 산부인과)
  • Published : 2002.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: Pelvic tuberculosis (TB) causes infertility despite of anti-TB chemotherapy and IVF-ET is effective treatment to achieve pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of IVF-ET in pelvic TB, especially according to main Tb lesion, and to investigate the factors affecting the successful outcome. Methods: A total of 135 IVF-ET cycles were performed in 54 patients with pelvic TB and the outcome was compared with that of control group with tubal factor not associated with TB in 301 cycles, 227 patients. Anti-TB chemotherapy was performed in the patients with pelvic TB. Pregnancy rate was compared according to main TB lesion as salpingitis, peritonitis, and endometritis. In the patients with endometrial TB, when complicated with uterine synechia, hysteroscopic lysis was done before IVF-ET and pregnancy rate was compared according to the presence of uterine synechia. Results: There was no significant difference in peak E2 ($2,790{\pm}280.1$ vs $2,554{\pm}101.2$, p>0.05), the number of retrieved oocytes ($13.5{\pm}0.7$ vs $12.5{\pm}0.4$, p>0.05) and fertilized oocytes ($7.7{\pm}0.5$ vs $7.8{\pm}0.3$, p>0.05) between patient and control group. Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer in pelvic TB group was 22.9% and showed no difference from that of control group (24.3%, p>0.05). Although it was not statistically significant, pregnancy rate in the endometrial Tb (18%) was lower than that in the salpingitis (28.5%) or peritonitis (26.5%) (p>0.05). In the endometrial TB with uterine synechia, pregnancy rate was significantly lower than that of the patients without synechia even after hysteroscopic lysis (9.7% vs 31.6%, p<0.05). Conclusion: IVF-ET after anti-TB chemotherapy is the most effective treatment to achieve pregnancy in infertile patients with pelvic TB. Because the presence of endometrial TB and resulting uterine synechia affects the outcome of IVF-ET, thorough evaluation for endometrium with endometrial biopsy and hysteroscopy is important to predict the prognosis of IVF-ET treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Shaefer G. Female genital tract. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1976; 19: 223-39 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-197603000-00016
  2. Smith B, Porter R, Ahuja K, Craft I. Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in stimulated cycles in an in-vitro and embryo transfer programme. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1984; 1: 233-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131622
  3. Snider DE, Roper WL. The new tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:703-5 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199203053261011
  4. Parikh FR, Naik N, Nadkami SG, Soonawala SB, Kamat SA, Parikh RM. Genital tuberculosis- a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian women. Fertil Steril 1997; 67(3): 497-500 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)80076-3
  5. Falk V, Ludviksson K, Agten G. Genital tuberculosis in women, analysis of 187 newly diagnosed cases from 47 Swedish hospitals during the ten year period 1968-1977. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138:974-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(80)91090-X
  6. Gamel V. Microsurgery in female infertility. Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1983: 129-30
  7. Frydman R, Eibschitz I, Belaisch-Allart JC, Hazout A, Hamou JE. In vitro fertilization in tuberculous infertility. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 1985; 2: 184-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201795
  8. Marcus SF, Rizk B, Fountain S, Brinsden P. Tuberculous infertility and in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171(6): 1593-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(94)90408-1
  9. Klein TA, Richmond RA, Mishell ER. Pelvic tuberculosis. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 48: 99-104
  10. Kathleen DE, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 1990; 161:977-81 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/161.5.977
  11. Le Coutour X, Delecour M, Leroy JL, Puech F. Does genital tuberculosis still exist? Recent review. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1984; 13:419-23
  12. Nogales-Oritz F,Tarancon I, Nogales FF. The pathology of female genital tuberculosis. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 422-8
  13. Varma T. Genital tuberculosis and subsequent fertility. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 35: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(91)90056-B
  14. Sutherland AM. Gynecological tuberculosis. Br J Hosp Med 1979; 12:569-74
  15. Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Laparoscopic observations of pelvic organsin pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990;32(2): 129-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(90)90477-3
  16. Saracoglu OF, Mungan T, Tanzer F. Pelvic tuberculosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 37(2): 115-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(92)90492-2
  17. Lal N, Soto-Wright V. Peritoneal tuberculosis: diagnostic options. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1999;7(5): 244-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1999)7:5<244::AID-IDOG7>3.0.CO;2-1
  18. Soussis I, Trew G, Matalliotakis I, Margara R, Winston RML. In vitro fertilization treatment in genital tuberculosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15(6): 378-80 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022533016670
  19. 김석현, 김문흥, 지병철, 정병준, 서창석, 최영민 등. 골반결핵 불임 환자에서의 체외수정 시술에 관한 연구. 대한산부회지 1998; 41(4): 1046-54
  20. Gurgan T, Urman B, Yarali H. Results of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women with infertility due to genital tuberculosis. FertiI Steril 1996; 65(2): 367-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58101-1
  21. Victor Ruiz-Velasco, Alfani GG, Sanchez LP, Vera MA. Endometrial pathology and infertility Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 687-92
  22. Valle RF, Sciarra JI. Intrauterine adhesion: hysteroscopicdiagnosis, classification, treatment and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1459-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90382-1