Comparison of Family Concept between Young and Middle-Aged Adults

청년과 중년의 가족 개념 비교분석

  • Published : 2002.10.01

Abstract

This article explored the perceptions of ‘family’and the factors related to respondents' definitions of a family. The data were collected from two types of people: one was 472 university students and high school students' parents who were asked whether or not each of 22 scenarios represented a‘family’, and the other was 40 young and middle-aged adults who were asked,“what is a family member?”. Results showed that (1) the overwhelming majority of respondents considered a married couple without a child(scenario #5) as a family and the least respondents agreed a divorced couple(scenario #18) as a family, (2) the majority perceived consanguinity, co-residence, parental status, and marital status to be important in the definition of a family, (3) middle-aged adults were more likely than young generation to agree that consanguinity and paternal relations were important in determining what a family member is.

Keywords

References

  1. 김규원(1995). 가족개념의 인식과 가치관. 가족학논집, 7, 213-255
  2. 박경란, 이영숙, 전귀연(2001) 현대가족학. 서울. 학지사
  3. 양옥경 (2000). 한국 가족개념에 관한 질적 연구. 한국가족복지학, 6, 69-99
  4. 양옥경(2000). 한국가족개념의 변화: 신가족주의의 모색. 21C 가족의 변화와 사회복지적 과제. 한국가족사회복지학회 제7회 학술대회. 9-31
  5. 양옥경(2001). 가족개념에 대한 대학생의 의식 연구. 한국가족복지학, 7, 175-199
  6. 유영주(1993) 한국가족의 기능연구 대내적 기능을 중심으로. 서울: 교문사
  7. 이동원, 함인희(1992). 도시 중산층 가족 . 가족과 계층의 연결고리를 중심으로. 가족학논집, 4, 135-156
  8. 이은경(1999). 대학생의 가족주의 가치관과 부모노후의 부양의식에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 37(1), 45-65
  9. 장현섭(1995). 이혼경향에 대한 또 하나의 해석을 위하여. 한국가족학회 편. 한국가족문제 진단과 전망. 27-93. 서울: 하우
  10. 조미숙, 오선주(1999). 청소년기 자녀가 지각한 가족관계 변인과 청소년의 가족가치관. 한국가족관계학회지, 4(1), 67-89
  11. 최재석(1990) 한국가족제도. 서울: 일지사
  12. Cherlin, A. J. & Callhoun, C. (1999). Public and Private Families: An Introduction.(2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill College
  13. Elliot, F.R. (1986) 지음. 안병철. 서동인 옮김. 가족사회학. 서울: 을유문화사
  14. Fine, M. A. (1993). Current approaches to understanding family diversity: An Overview of the special issue. Family Relations, 42, 235-237 https://doi.org/10.2307/585550
  15. Fitzpatrick, M.A. & Badzinsik, D.M (1994). All in the family: Interpersonal communicaion in kin relationships. In Knapp, M.L., & Miller, G.R. Handbook of Interpersonal Communicaion (Znd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 726-771
  16. Flexman, R, Berke, D.L., Settles, B.H. (1999). Negotiating family: The interface between family and support groups. Marriage and Family Review, 28(3/4), 173-190 https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v28n03_14
  17. Ford, D.Y. (1994). An exploration of perceptions of alternative family structures among university students. Family Relations, 43, 68-73 https://doi.org/10.2307/585144
  18. Gubrium, J. F. & Holstein,J. A. (1990). What isfamily? Mountain View,CA: Mayfield
  19. Levin, I. (1999). What phenomenon is family? Marriage & Family Review, 28-3/4, 93-104 https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v28n03_08
  20. Levin, I. and Trost, J. (1992). Understanding the concept of family. Family Relations, 41, 348-351 https://doi.org/10.2307/585202
  21. Peters, J. F. (1999). Redefining western families. Marriage & Family Review, 28(3/4), 55-66
  22. Powell, J.A., Wiltcher, B.J., Wedemeyer, N.V., & Claypool, P.L. (1981). The young child's developing concept of family. Home Ecomomics Research Journal, 10(2), 137-149 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8101000204
  23. Shehan, C. L. & Kammeyer, K. C. W. (1997). Marriages and Families: Reflections of a Gendered Society. Boston: Allynand Bacon
  24. Steinmetz, S. K, Clavan, S., & Stein, K F. (1990). Marriage and Family Realities: Historical and Comiemporarv Perspectives. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers
  25. Trost, J. (1999). Family as a set of dyads. Marriage and Family Review, 28(3/4), 79-91 https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v28n03_07