DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Support Effects of Containing Catalysts on Methanol Dehydrogenation


Abstract

CuO/ZnO, CuO/SiO,sub>2, and CuO/ZrO2 catalysts were prepared for investigating the support effects on methanol dehydrogenation. It was found that the conversion of methanol was proportional to the copper surface area on Cu/ZnO cat alysts and was independent on that on Cu/ZrO2 and Cu/SiO2. The highest copper surface area was obtained with the Cu/ZrO2 (9/1). The unusual deactivation of the Cu/ZnO, which showed the highest selectivity among the catalysts tested, was observed. Pulse reaction with methanol indicated that the lattice oxygen in ZnO could be removed by forming CO2 in the catalytic reaction, supporting that the ZnO reduction was responsible for the severe deactivation of the Cu/ZnO.

Keywords

References

  1. King, D. L.; Grate, J. H. Chemtech. 1985, 244.
  2. Chinchen, G. C.; Denny, P. J.; Jennings, J. R.; Spencer, M. S.;Waugh, K. C. Appl. Catal. 1988, 36, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80103-7
  3. Bart, J. C. J.; Sneeden, R. P. A. Catalysis Today 1987, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(87)80001-9
  4. Ogden, J. M.; Steinbugler, M. M.; Kreutz, T. G. J. Power Sources1999, 79, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00057-9
  5. Ledjeff-Heg, K.; Formanski, V.; Kalk, T.; Roes, J. J. PowerSouces 1998, 71, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02760-2
  6. Lee, J. S.; Kim, K. C.; Kim, Y. G. Appl. Catal. 1990, 57, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80720-4
  7. Ikarashi, T. Chem. Econ. Eng. Rev. 1980, 12, 31.
  8. Morikawa, Y.; Takasi, K.; Morooka, Y.; Ikawa, T. Chem. Lett.1982, 11, 1085.
  9. USPat. 1400195 (1922).
  10. Sodesawa, T.; Nagacho, M.; Onodera, A.; Nozaki, F. J. Catal.1986, 102, 460. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(86)90183-1
  11. Sodesawa, T. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1986, 32, 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02063449
  12. JapPat. 2235846.
  13. JapPat. 2292238.
  14. Jung, K. D.; Joo, O. S.; Han, S. H.; Uhm, S. J.; Chung, I. J. Catal.Lett. 1995, 35, 303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00807187
  15. Jung, K. D.; Joo, O. S.; Han, S. H. Catal. Lett. 2000, 68, 49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019027302428
  16. Taharashi, M.; Hansen, T. J. Catal. 1984, 87, 305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(84)90191-X
  17. Ueno, A.; Onishi, T.; Tamaru, K. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1970, 66,756. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9706600756
  18. Ahkter, S.; Cheng, W. H.; Lui, K.; Kung, H. H. J. Catal. 1984, 85,437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(84)90233-1
  19. Evans, J. W.; Wainwright, M. S.; Bridgewater, A. J.; Young, D. J.Appl. Catal. 1983, 7, 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(83)80239-5

Cited by

  1. vol.2, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300480c