Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Volume 5 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.24-32
- /
- 2001
- /
- 2384-1095(pISSN)
- /
- 2384-1109(eISSN)
Reproducibility of Hemispheric Language Dominance by Noun, Verb, Adjective and Adverb Generation Paradigms in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Normal Volunteers
정상성인의 뇌기능적 자기공명영상에서 명사, 동사, 형용사 그리고 부사 만들기 과제들에 대한 언어영역편재화의 재현성에 관한 연구
- In Chan Song (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, SNUMRU) ;
- Kee Hyun Chang (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, SNUMRU) ;
- Chun Kee Chung (Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SNUMRU) ;
- Sang Hyun Lee (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, SNUMRU) ;
- Moon Hee Han (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, SNUMRU)
- Published : 2001.06.01
Abstract
Purpose : We investigated the reproducibility of language lateralization by 4 different word generation paradigms or the rest contents in each paradigm using functional magnetic resonance imaging in normal volunteers Materials and Methods Nine normal volunteers with left-handedness (mean age: 25 yrs) were examined on a 1.57 MR unit using a single-shot gradient echo epibold sequence. Four different word generation paradigms of noun, verb, adjective and adverb were used in each normal volunteer for investigating language system. In each paradigm, two different rest contents consisted of only seeing the " +" symbol or reading the meaningless letters. Each task consisted of 96 phases including 3 activations and 6 rests of 2 different contents. Two activation maps in one task were obtained under two different rest contents using the correlation method. We evaluated the detection rates of Broca and Wernicke areas and the differences of language lateralization among four different word generation paradigms, or between the rest contents. Results : The detection rates of Broca and Wernicke areas were over 67 % in 4 different language paradigms and there was no significant difference of them among language paradigms, or between two different rest contents. Language dominances, in all 4 different language paradigms, were shown to be consistent in 66 %, but were contrary with language paradigms in some subjects. The rest contents made no significant effect on dominant language dominance determination, but the success rates of the dominant language dominances determined from 4 language paradigms were higher in reading the meaningless letter (100%, n=9) than in only seeing "+" on screen at the rest task (78%, n=7).
Keywords