작은 기계 판막을 이용한 대도액 판막 치환술 후 판막 전후 압력차

transprosthetic Pressure Gradient after aortic Valve Replacement with Small Sized Prostheses

  • 황경환 (동광주병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 박계현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 차대원 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 전태국 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 박표원 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 채헌 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 흉부외과)
  • Hwang, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dong Kwang Ju Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kay-Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, SungKyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cha, Dae-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, SungKyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jun, Tae-Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, SungKyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Pyo-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, SungKyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chae, Hurn (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, SungKyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2000.02.01

초록

background: The prognosis after an aortic valve replacment can be affected significantly by the transprosthetic pressure gradient which is determined mainly by the size of the patients body and the prosthesis used. We analyzed the hemodynamic feature of two relatively new prosthese the ATS and the evensized Medtronic-Hall(M-H) valves by measuring the transprosthetic pressure gradient in the cases where small sizes (23mm or smaller) were used. Material and method: There were 94 patients who received whom aortic valve replacement with prosthesis smaller than 23 mm from October 1994 to June 1998. In these patients the transprosthetic pressure gradient clalculated from the pressure half time during postoperative Dopper echocardiographic examination was compared between the prostheses of different sizes. The body surface area of each patient was also taken into consideration. result: The mean pressure gradient and body surface area in each group were 21.7$\pm$10.2 mmHg and 1.52$\pm$0.14m2 in ATS 19mm 11.4$\pm$6.5 mmHg and 1,57$\pm$0.20m2 in M-H 20mm 15.2$\pm$6.3 mmHg and 1.54$\pm$0.13m2 in ATS 21mm 9.3$\pm$2.5 mmHg and 1.63 $\pm$0.14m2 in M-H 22 mm and 12.9$\pm$5.3 mmHg and 1.69$\pm$0.13m2 in ATS 23mm. Conclusion: The 19mm ATS prosthesis showed significant trasprosthetic pressure gradient which is similar to the values previously reported with other bileaflet prosthesesm Close follow-up was needed in terms of exercise capacity and change in left ventiricular geometry. In patients with small aortic valve annulus the 20mm M-H valve is recomendable as an alternative to 19mm bileaflet valves because it has less pressure gradient with similar outer diameter.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 대흉외지 v.30 대동맥판 치환술의 임상성적 나국주;오정우;안병희;김상형
  2. J.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.112 Influence of the size of aortic valve prosthesis on hemodynamics and change on left ventricular mass;Implications for surgical management of aortic stenosis Gonzalea-Juanatey JR.;Garcia-Acuna JM.;Fernandez MV.;Cendon AA.;Fuentes VC.;Garcia-Bengaoechea JB.;et al.
  3. Eur J.Cardio-thorac Surg v.8 Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement Sim EKW.;Orszulak TA.;Shob C.;Schaff HV.
  4. Ann Thorac Surg v.57 The risk of small St.Jude aortic valve prosthesis Kratz JM.;Sade RM.;Stroud MR.;Crawford FA.;Crumbley Ⅲ AJ.
  5. Ann Thorac Surg v.65 Discrepancies between sizer and valve dimensions;implications for small aortic root Bartels D.;Leyh RG.;Sievers H.;Bechtel M.;Joubert-Hubener E.
  6. J.Heart Valve Dis v.59 no.SUP.Ⅲ The small aortic root and the Medtronic-Hall valve;Ultrafast computed tomographic assessment of left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement Anderson WA.;Ilkowski DA.;McGrath LB.
  7. J.Herat Valve Dis v.5 no.SUP.Ⅲ Hemodynamic performances of small diameter Carbomedics and St.Jude valves Paulis RD.;Sommariva L.;Chiariello L.
  8. Circulation v.76 no.SUP.Ⅲ Aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis Teoh KH.;Fulop JC.;Rakowski H.;Weisel RD.Ivanov J.;Tong CP.
  9. Ann Thorac Surg v.63 Do small aortic valves influence long-tern survival? Christakis GT.;Goldman BS.
  10. J.Cardiovasc Surg v.33 Hemodynamics of 21 and 23mm Medtronic-Hall valves by Doppler echocardiography Ota T.;Iwahashi K.;Okada M.;Nakamura K.