DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic wind effects : a comparative study of provisions in codes and standards with wind tunnel data

  • Kijewski, T. (NatHaz Modeling Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame) ;
  • Kareem, A. (NatHaz Modeling Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame)
  • Published : 1998.03.25

Abstract

An evaluation and comparison of seven of the world's major building codes and standards is conducted in this study, with specific discussion of their estimations of the alongwind, acrosswind, and torsional response, where applicable, for a given building. The codes and standards highlighted by this study are those of the United States, Japan, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, China and Europe. In addition, the responses predicted by using the measured power spectra of the alongwind, acrosswind and torsional responses for several building shapes tested in a wind tunnel are presented and a comparison between the response predicted by wind tunnel data and that estimated by some of the standards is conducted. This study serves not only as a comparison of the response estimates by international codes and standards, but also introduces a new set of wind tunnel data for validation of wind tunnel-based empirical expressions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : NSF

References

  1. AIJ Recommendation for Loads on Buildings (1993), Architectural Institute of Japan, Japan. (in Japanese).
  2. AIJ Recommendations for Loads on Buildings (1996), Architectural Institute of Japan, Japan.
  3. ASCE Standard, ASCE7-95 : Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (1995), American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
  4. Australian Standard : Minimum Design Loads on Structures (Known as the SAA Loading Code) Part 2 : Wind Loads.(1989), Standards Australia, Sydney.
  5. Boggs, D.W. and Peterka, J.A. (1989), "Aerodynamic model tests of tall buildings," J. of Eng. Mech., ASCE, 115(3) 618-635. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:3(618)
  6. British Standard, Loadings for Buildings-Part 2 : Code of Practice for Wind Loads (1995), Building and Civil Engineering Sector Board, United Kingdom.
  7. China National Standard : GBJ9 Load Code for Building Structures (1987), China.
  8. Chiu, G.L.F. and Perry, D.C. (1997), "Low-rise building wind load provisions-where are we and where do we need to go," Eng. J., AISC 4th quarter.
  9. CWE-92 Computational Wind Engineering I (1993), Editor, S. Murakami, Elsevier Science B.V.
  10. CWE-96 Computational Wind Engineering II (1997), Editor, R.N. Meroney and B. Bienkiewicz, Elsevier Science B.V.
  11. Davenport, A.G. (1967), "Gust loading factors," J. of Str. Div., ASCE 93(ST3) 11-34.
  12. ESDU (1989), "Calculation methods for along-wind loading, Part 3 : Response of buildings and plate-like structures to atmospheric turbulence," Item No. 88019, with amendments A & B, ESDU International, London, March.
  13. European Prestandard, Ratified European Text, Eurocode 1 : Basis of Design and actions on structures-Part 2-4 : Actions on Structures-Wind Actions (1995), European Committee for Standardization.
  14. Ferraro, V., Irwin, P.A., and Stone, G.K. (1989), "Wind induced building accelerations," Proc. of the 6th US Natl. Conf. on Wind Eng., Houston, Texas.
  15. Greig, G.L. (1980), "Toward an estimate of wind-induced dynamic torque on tall buildings," Master's Thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
  16. Gurley, K. and Kareem, A. (1993), "Gust loading factors for tension leg platforms," App. Ocean Research 15(3) 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1187(93)90037-X
  17. Holmes, J.D., Melbourne, W.H., and Walker, G.R., (1990), A Commentary on the Australian Standard For Wind Loads, Australian Wind Engineering Society, Australia.
  18. Kareem, A. (1982), "Acrosswind response of buildings," J. of Struct. Eng., ASCE, 108(ST4) 869-887.
  19. Kareem, A. (1984), "Model for prediction of the acrosswind response of buildings," Eng. Struct., 6(2) 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(84)90006-3
  20. Kareem, A. (1985), "Lateral-torsional motion of tall buildings to wind loads," J. of Struct. Eng., ASCE, 111(11) 2749-2496.
  21. Kareem, A. (1987), "Wind effects on structures : a probabilistic viewpoint," Probabilistic Eng. Mech., 2(4) 166-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(87)90009-9
  22. Kareem, A. (1989), "Mapping and synthesis of random pressure fields," J. of Eng. Mech., ASCE, 115(10).
  23. Kareem, A. (1990), "Measurements of pressure and force fields on building models in simulated atmospheric Flows," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero. 36 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90341-9
  24. Kareem, A. (1992), "Dynamic response of high-rise buildings to stochastic wind loads," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero. 41-44 1101-1112.
  25. Kareem, A. and Cermak, J.E. (1979), "Wind tunnel simulation of wind-structure interactions," ISA Transactions, 18(4) 23-41.
  26. Kareem, A., Tognarelli, M., and Gurley, K. (1997), "Modeling and analysis of quadratic term in the wind effects on structures," Proc. of the 2nd European Conf on Wind Eng., Genova, Italy, June.
  27. Katagiri, J. et al (1992), "Wind-induced lateral torsional motion of a tall buildings," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero., 41 1127-1137.
  28. Lee, B.E. and Ng, W.K. (1988), "Comparisons of estimated dynamic along-wind response," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero., 30 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90080-3
  29. Loh, P. and Isyumov, N. (1985), "Overall wind loads on tall buildings and comparisons with code values," Proc. of the 5th US Natl. Conf. on Wind Eng., Lubbock, Texas.
  30. National Building Code of Canada (1995), Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council, Canada.
  31. Reinhold, T.A., and Kareem, A. (1986), "Wind loads and building response predictions using force balance techniques," Proc. of the 3rd ASCE Eng. Mech. Conf.-Dynamics of Structures, UCLA.
  32. Simiu, E. (1976), "Equivalent static wind loads for tall building design," J. of Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(4) 719-737.
  33. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R. (1996). Wind Effects on Structures : Fundamentals and Applications to Design, 3rd Ed., Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
  34. Simiu, E. and Stathopoulos, T. (1997), "Codification of wind loads on buildings using bluff body aerodynamics and climatological data bases," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero. 69-71 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00180-3
  35. Solari, G. (1982), "Alongwind response estimations. Closed form solution," J. of Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(1) 225-244.
  36. Solari, G. and Kareem, A. (1997), "On the formulation of ASCE7-95 gust factor," Proc. of the 8th US Natl. Conf. on Wind Eng., CD ROM, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, June (also to appear in J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero.).
  37. Tamura, Y., T. Ohkuma, and Kanda, J. (1996). Wind Resistant Design, Kajima Corp, Japan (in Japanese).
  38. Tschanz, T. and Davenport, A.G. (1983), "The base balance technique for the determination of dynamic wind loads," J. of Wind Eng. and Ind. Aero., 13(1-3) 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90162-9
  39. Vellozzi, J. and Cohen, H. (1968), "Gust response factors," J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 97(6) 1295-1313.
  40. Vickery, B.J. (1970), "On the reliability of gust loading factors," Proc. of Technical Mtg. : Wind Loads, NBS, Washington, D.C.
  41. Vickery, P.J., et al (1985), "The effect of modal shape on the wind-induced response of tall buildings," Proc. of the 5th US Natl. Conf. on Wind Eng., Lubbock, Texas.

Cited by

  1. Optimization of urban optical wireless communication systems vol.24, pp.5, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2003.814351
  2. Coupled Dynamic Analysis and Equivalent Static Wind Loads on Buildings with Three-Dimensional Modes vol.131, pp.7, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:7(1071)
  3. LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for an isolated and a surrounded tall building vol.115, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.026
  4. Lateral loading and response for a tall building in the non-seismic doldrums vol.27, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.021
  5. e-Analysis of High-Rise Buildings Subjected to Wind Loads vol.134, pp.7, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1139)
  6. Estimation of stochastic crosswind response of wind-excited tall buildings with nonlinear aerodynamic damping vol.56, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.044
  7. Aerodynamic Loads on Tall Buildings: Interactive Database vol.129, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:3(394)
  8. Effects of atmospheric turbulence and building sway on optical wireless-communication systems vol.28, pp.2, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.000129
  9. Consistent inflow turbulence generator for LES evaluation of wind-induced responses for tall buildings vol.142, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.004
  10. Wind-induced response control model for high-rise buildings based on resizing method vol.21, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802742
  11. Gust loading factor—past, present and future vol.91, pp.12-15, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.003
  12. Integrated aerodynamic load determination and stiffness design optimization of tall buildings vol.18, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.397
  13. Reliability analysis of wind-excited structures vol.98, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.08.010
  14. Aspects of the dynamic wind-induced response of structures and codification vol.8, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.4.251
  15. Efficacy of Averaging Interval for Nonstationary Winds vol.140, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000641
  16. Aeroelastic Balance vol.129, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:3(283)
  17. Vibration control of ultra-sensitive facilities vol.159, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2006.159.5.295
  18. Three-dimensional wind load effects and wind-induced dynamic responses of a tall building with X-shape vol.19, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.514
  19. Characteristics of wind forces acting on tall buildings vol.93, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.12.001
  20. Extreme value of wind-excited response considering influence of bandwidth vol.21, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-013-0015-x
  21. Simplified formulas for evaluation of across-wind dynamic responses of rectangular tall buildings vol.8, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.3.197
  22. Analysis of crosswind fatigue of wind-excited structures with nonlinear aerodynamic damping vol.74, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.049
  23. The wind-induced response characteristics of atypical tall buildings vol.18, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.419
  24. Mode Shape Corrections for Wind Load Effects vol.128, pp.1, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(15)
  25. The role of analytical methods for evaluating the wind-induced response of structures vol.90, pp.12-15, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00264-7
  26. Experimental and numerical investigation of the tracer gas methodology in the case of a naturally cross-ventilated building vol.56, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.006
  27. Design technology based on resizing method for reduction of costs and carbon dioxide emissions of high-rise buildings vol.138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.095
  28. Variations in wind load on tall buildings due to urban development vol.34, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.008
  29. Wind-induced natural ventilation of re-entrant bays in a high-rise building vol.99, pp.2-3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.11.002
  30. Analysis and performance of offshore platforms in hurricanes vol.2, pp.1, 1999, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.1999.2.1.001
  31. Along-Wind Load Effects on Tall Buildings: Comparative Study of Major International Codes and Standards vol.128, pp.6, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:6(788)
  32. A probabilistic approach for the full response estimation of tall buildings with 3D modes using the HFFB vol.44, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.06.002
  33. Enhancing wind performance of tall buildings using corner aerodynamic optimization vol.136, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.019
  34. On the formulation of ASCE7-95 gust effect factor vol.77, pp.None, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6105(98)00182-2
  35. Evaluation of modal contribution to the wind-induced responses of tall buildings vol.20, pp.6, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00148-8
  36. Integrated Platform for the Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings for Wind Loads vol.15, pp.4, 1998, https://doi.org/10.2478/mmce-2019-0009
  37. Experimental Study on the Seismic Response of Longhouses Using Scale Models vol.30, pp.1, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1616515
  38. Aerodynamic analysis of pentagon-shaped tall buildings vol.22, pp.1, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00296-2
  39. A Comparative Study of Wind Tunnel Tests and Design Codes in Evaluation of Along-Wind Effects on Towers vol.2021, pp.None, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8818057
  40. Comparison of the Canadian standard and other standards for wind loading on self-supporting telecommunication towers vol.48, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0210