DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

When sustainable technologies are ignored. Socio-technical systems thinking, construction and sustainable development.

  • Published : 2024.07.29

Abstract

Achieving sustainable futures requires the construction industry to employ digitalization processes, appropriate procurement methods and innovative technologies. However, sustainable technologies in the built environment are often ignored and under-used by clients and users of buildings and facilities, meaning the benefits of sustainable technologies can be missed. This paper provides reflections of one such technology as experienced by the author: a digital toilet installed in a hotel. Through an autoethnographic approach, the paper mobilises socio-technical systems thinking to examine and analyze the digital technology in-situ to identify factors leading to a negative experience from the authors' perspective. The socio-technical systems analysis identifies several issues to explain its' non-functioning status: these revolving around people; goals; culture; technology; processes/procedures and buildings/infrastructure. The analysis provides a framework for both retrospective review and upgrading of existing technologies and an assistive tool to assist in the planning, design and installation of new sustainable technologies in the future. A discussion explores the issues further in respect to construction project industries and their role in addressing the issues identified. It is contended that achieving sustainable futures requires both predictive analysis of new technologies in the built environment and retrospective review and adaptation of technologies already in our built environment.

Keywords

References

  1. S.K.Yevu, A.T.W.Yu, A.Darko, "Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: Emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes", Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 322, 2021. 
  2. H. Grosse, "Autoethnographic Writing as a Strategic Tool in a Medium-Sized Construction Company: A Strategy as Practice Approach", In: Scott, L and Neilson, C J (Eds.), Proceedings 36th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-8 September 2020, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 776-785, 2020. 
  3. M.C. Davis, R. Challenger, D.N. Jayewardene, C.W. Clegg, "Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: A call for bravery", Applied Ergonomics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp.171-180, 2014. 
  4. Baxter, G. and Sommerville, I. (2011). Sociotechnical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with computers, 23, 4-17. 
  5. Pasmore, W, Francis, C, Haldeman, J. (1982). Sociotechnical systems: a North American reflection on empirical studies of the seventies. Human Relations, 35: 1179-1204. 
  6. Trist, E.L., Bamforth, K.W., 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: an examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations 4 (1) 
  7. P.M.Salmon, N.A.Stanton, M.Lenne, D.P.Jenkins, L.Rafferty, G.H.Walker, "Human Factors Methods and Accident Analysis: Practical Guidance and Case Study Applications", Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey, 2011. 
  8. Leavitt, H.J. (1965). Applying organizational change in industry: structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In: March, J.G. (Ed.) Handbook of Organisations. Rand McNally, Chicago, IL. USA. 1144-1170. 
  9. Challenger, R., Clegg, C.W., Robinson, M.A., 2010a. Understanding Crowd Behaviours. In: Practical Guidance and Lessons Identified, vol. 1. TSO, London. 
  10. R. Challenger, C.W. Clegg, M.A. Robinson, "Understanding Crowd Behaviours", in: Supporting Theory and Evidence, vol. 2. TSO, London, 2010b 
  11. R. Challenger, C.W. Clegg, "Crowd disasters: a socio-technical systems Perspective", Contemporary Social Science, vol. 6, pp. 343-360, 2011. 
  12. S. Kanjanabootra, B. Corbitt, "Reproducing knowledge in construction expertise: A reflexive theory, critical approach", Construction Management and Economics, vol. 34, no. 7/8, pp. 561-577,
  13. S. Kempster, J. Stewart, J, "Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of situated learning of leadership practice", Management Learning, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 205-219, 2010. 
  14. M.J. Verkerk, "Trust and Power on the Shop Floor: An Ethnographical, Ethical and Philosophical Study on Responsible Behaviour in Industrial Organisations", Eburon Academic Publishers 2005. 
  15. A. Whaley, "Why Claims Fail: An Autoethnographic Investigation of Claims Management under GCC Construction Contracts" in Proceedings 32nd Annual ARCOM Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, Eds. P.W.Chan, C.J.Neilson, 2016. Manchester UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 217-225 
  16. C. Sutherland, E. Reynaert, S. Dhlamini, F. Magwaza, J. Lienert, M.E. Riechmann, S. Buthelezi, D. Khumalo, E. Morgenroth, K.M. Udert, R.C. Sindall, "Socio-technical analysis of a sanitation innovation in a peri-urban household in Durban, South Africa", Science of The Total Environment, vol. 755, no. 2, 2021. 
  17. S. Panebianco, C. Pahl-Wostl, "Modelling socio-technical transformations in wastewater treatment - A methodological proposal", Technovation, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1090-1100, 2006. 
  18. P. Bansal, "Sustainable development in an age of disruption", Academy of Management Discoveries, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8-12, 2019.