Automated Phase Identification in Shingle Installation Operation Using Machine Learning

  • Dutta, Amrita (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University) ;
  • Breloff, Scott P. (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) ;
  • Dai, Fei (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University) ;
  • Sinsel, Erik W. (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) ;
  • Warren, Christopher M. (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) ;
  • Wu, John Z. (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health)
  • Published : 2022.06.20

Abstract

Roofers get exposed to increased risk of knee musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) at different phases of a sloped shingle installation task. As different phases are associated with different risk levels, this study explored the application of machine learning for automated classification of seven phases in a shingle installation task using knee kinematics and roof slope information. An optical motion capture system was used to collect knee kinematics data from nine subjects who mimicked shingle installation on a slope-adjustable wooden platform. Four features were used in building a phase classification model. They were three knee joint rotation angles (i.e., flexion, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation) of the subjects, and the roof slope at which they operated. Three ensemble machine learning algorithms (i.e., random forests, decision trees, and k-nearest neighbors) were used for training and prediction. The simulations indicate that the k-nearest neighbor classifier provided the best performance, with an overall accuracy of 92.62%, demonstrating the considerable potential of machine learning methods in detecting shingle installation phases from workers knee joint rotation and roof slope information. This knowledge, with further investigation, may facilitate knee MSD risk identification among roofers and intervention development.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the support of NIOSH, who funded this research. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.