Comparison of alarm systems for advanced control room

  • Lee, H.C. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Oh, I.S. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Sim, B.S. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Koo, I.S. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, J.T. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, K.Y. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Park, J.K (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Published : 1997.10.01

Abstract

This study is carried out to investigate performance differences between two alarm presentation methods from the viewpoint of human factors and to provide items to be improved. One of the alarm display methods considered in this study displays alarm lists on VDT combined with hardwired alarm panels. The other method displays alarms on plant mimic diagrams of VDT. This alarm display method has other features for operator aid with which operator can get detailed information on the activated alarm in the mimic diagrams, and the capability for alarm processing such as alarm reduction and prioritization. To compare the twodisplay methods, a human factor experiment was performed with a plant simulator in the ITF(Integrated Test Fcility) that plant operators run for 4 event scenarios. During the experiment, physiological measurements, system and operator action log, and audio/video recordings were collected. Operators' subjective opinion was collected as well after the experiment. Time, error rate and situation awareness were major human factor criteria used for the comparison during the analysis stage of the experiment. No statistical significance was found in the results of our statistical comparison analysis. Several findings were identified, however, through the analysis of subjective opinions.

Keywords