• Title/Summary/Keyword: xposure

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Analytical method for analyzing formaldehyde using 2, 4-DNPH and gas chromatography/FID, NPD (2,4-DNPH와 가스크로마토그래프를 이용한 포름알데히드 분석방법)

  • Jeong, Jee Yeon;Park, Seung Hyun;Yi, Gwang Yong;Oh, Se Min
    • Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.126-146
    • /
    • 2000
  • To develop and evaluate formaldehyde measurement method using 2,4-dinitro-phenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH) coated sampler and gas chromatography, laboratory test and field test were conducted. Results of this study are as follows. Limit of detection(LOD) of measurement methods, HPLC-UVD, GC-NPD and GC-FID, is $0.008{\mu}g/m{\ell}$ $0.060{\mu}g/m{\ell}$, $0.472{\mu}g/m{\ell}$ respectively. Coefficiency of measurement methods, HPLC-UVD, GC-NPD and GC-FID, is 0.008, 0.009, 0.020 respectively. Desorption efficiency of sep-pak xposure aldehyde sampler and sorbent sample tube is 1.05(range : 0.99 - 1.12), 1.02(range : 0.99 - 1.06) respectively. Samples of sorbent sample tube and sep-pak xposure aldehyde sampler turned out to be stored at refrigerator, according to storage test results. Measurement methods of HPLC-UVD, GC-NPD, GC-FID, according to results of precision for the combined sampling and analytical procedure, became acceptable to OSHA evaluation standard. Field test using exposure chamber met the NIOSH overall uncertainty recommendation(less than 25%). Overall uncertainty of Sepak-HPLC(UVD), Tube-GC(NPD), Tube-GC(FID) is 11.0% - 17.0%. Consequently gas chromatography(GC-NPD, GC-FID) and high performance liquid chromatography(EPA TO-11) using 2,4-DNPH coated sampler for formaldehyde measurement turned out to be suitable to measure personal formaldehyde exposure at workplaces.

  • PDF

Density and Water Absorption Properties of Matrix Mixing with Powdered Active Carbon according to Binder Type (결합재 종류에 따른 분말활성탄소를 혼입한 경화체의 밀도 및 흡수율 특성)

  • Pyeon, Su-Jeong;Kim, Won-Jong;Lee, Sang-Soo
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2017.11a
    • /
    • pp.111-112
    • /
    • 2017
  • Radon has been considered the greatest source of exposure within the total radiation exposure of the human body. xposure from radon, which exists in indoor air quality, lacks public perception, Radon, which exists anywhere on earth, is not regarded as a state of attention even if it is above the average level. Indoor radon exposure situations are not intentionally introduced, and essentially the attention and responsibilities of radon exposures are assumed to be in indoor occupants. So, these are caused by common uranium and thorium scattering on Earth, and are brought into the building by fine cracks or exposed indicators of the buildings. Therefore, this study aims to reduce the risk of radon rays and reduce radon, which induces diseases caused by breathing in the body of indoor air pollutants and emitting diseases by emitting alpha rays from the radon gas.

  • PDF

Intercomparison of the KAERI Reference Photon and Beta Radiation Measurements (한국원자력연구소 기준 광자 및 베타선장 측정의 국제상호비교)

  • Chang, Si-Yeong;Kim, Bong-Hwan;Kim, Jang-Lyul;McDonald, J.C.;Murphy, M.K.
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • v.21 no.4
    • /
    • pp.255-262
    • /
    • 1996
  • This paper describes the results of intercomparison measurements of KAERI reference photon and beta radiation fields between the KAERI and the PNNL(Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), recently performed at KAERI radiation calibration and dosimetry laboratory on the basis of the ANSI N13.11 criteria for personal dosimeter performance test. Each laboratory used her own radiation detectors or measurement devices traceable to her national primary standard in measuring the exposure rates for photon fields, the absorbed dose rates for beta radiation fields. The agreements in reference radiation measurements between two laboratories were found to be less than ${\pm}2.0%$ for photon fields, ${\pm}1.0%$ for beta radiation fields. Therefore, it could be concluded that KAERI reference radiation fields comply well with the international standard and thus can further serve as a national basis for the researches and developments in radiation protection dosimetry in Korea.

  • PDF