• 복식
• /
• 제35권
• /
• pp.325-341
• /
• 1997

One of the noticeable trends of female wear in 1990s is the Outwearization of Underwear as it is called 'Lingerie look' This trend meaned 'Exposure Fashion' raised splendidly its head to the whole stage of fashion destrying the tradional concept having divided the fashion between outwear and underwear by Madonna an Americal populer singer showed up in front of the audience wearing the corset-dress as a stage custome. This corset-dress which can not be recognised whether it is underwear or outwear has been diffused into the mass as a fashionable trend re-gardless of any reason; therefore discrimi-nation of wear by space by far that is underwear should have the sstandard telling between private and public sector has been gradually tumbled. By the way what has propelled desigers to introduce the style continuously having the underwear motive such as outwear almost as same as underwear or underwear worn on out-wear etc. and has made it a fashion trends? How do we accept this "Ligerie look'fashion" The rearch on vogue of outwearization of underwear started by the questions above can be summarized as the followings The division between the sprit and the ma-terial-economic shrinkage by the collapse of the bubble economy in the late of 20 century and expectation for the next century doubt by changes of international politics dynamics for the next century and increasement of psycho-logical tention by the environmental destruc-tion etc, has been extended to break the sense of value down These frustration of the tra-ditional values and dissatisfaction on the pres-ent have reflected on the fashion pursuing some more sensational style to increase the ex-posure of the body. The revolution of wearing bouncing the con-servatismhas outwardly expressed underwear of the private sector. Therefore the spatial concept of wear which for the public sec-tor has been fallen into pieces and has broken the wall of the concept fixed by outwear on underwear. in addition the stage costome for the popular people like Madonna has not been limited by the specularity any more and has been assimilated with the normal wear on the street to take the distinction for away. The circumstances of the late of 20 century pursuing sensation and making sex commer-cialized have accordance with the outweari-zation of underwear. there it is on the basis of Minimalist's dogmatism has been expressed the maximization of expoure in the pubric space to popularize bra pants(knickers) as outwear. The reaction on the attribute of hiding and shanding has brought 'See-Through fashion' with the transparent materials, The contemporary doubt recalling the mem-ory of the past has sublimated corset which was an instument of toture for women into Romanticism to introduce it to fashion with the development of a new material not to be a tool of any oppression and maltretment any longer. The popularization of outwear like underwear what's more has brought high quality of underwear. There it has called for the variety of materials such as knit demin and velvet etc, and has urged the famous designers to enlarge their working boundaries to underwear designs, Besides outwearization of underwear has been popular even in the Orient which has the con-servative opinions on exposure ; so changes of the thoughts can be seen among the establish-ment generation on exposure of the body. As the more high tech information publi-cized and the more technology and media digitalized the more expression being analog the pursue for the new in fashion with vision never been seen and even though it is imprac-tical the experimental designers have drived the freedom beyond the traditional roles of the previous century. Consequently outwearization of underwear may be viewd as a trial as an expression responded the contemporary background. This trend in my opinion will have been lasted for a while by being proliperlated among lasted for a while by being proliperlated among the pub-lic who has the century-end anxiety and doubt and expectation for the next century.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제18호
• /
• pp.257-280
• /
• 2008

이 글은 국가기록원의 형사고발로 야기된 이른바 '기록물유출사건'을 검토하면서 사건의 진실을 넘어, 이런 사태가 발생하는 근본적인 이유를 점검해보자 한 것이다. 전직대통령은 자신의 재임 기간 중에 생산된 대통령기록물을 언제라도 볼 수 있는 권리가 법률적으로 보장되어 있는데, 이를 확대해석하여 재임시 복제해갔다. 이를 불법이라고 보고 형사고발한 것은 형식상 국가기록원이지만, 실제로는 현정부의 청와대측이었다. 이 사건의 결과가 어떻게 나든가를 차치하고, 이 사건이 기록관리에서 중시되는 것은, 대통령기록물에 대한 보호벽이 무너질지 모르기 때문이다. 그러나 이번 사건을 발생시킨 근본적 원인을 더듬어보면, 기록관리기구가 여전히 정치적으로 독립성을 갖고 있지 못한데 있다. 그런데 국가기록원이 최근 제출한 기록관리법률 개정안을 보면 국가기록관리위원회의 위상을 국무총리 직속에서 행정안정부 장관 직속의 기관을 하향조정하고 있다. 이는 기록관리기구의 정치적 독립을 더욱 어렵게하는 조치를 크게 우려하지 않을 수 없는 일이다. 기록관리에 있어 기록관리기구의 정치적 독립 이외에 또 하나의 중요한, 어찌보면 더 중요한 요소가 있으니, 기록관리의 전문성을 확보하는 것이다. 기록관리기구가 전문성을 확보하는 구체적인 조치는 개방형직위제의 도입과 전문가의 임용이라고 할 수 있다. 그런데 새정부 들어서서 이루어진 국가기록원의 조직개편을 보면, 기록관리의 전문성이 확대되기는 커녕 축소되고 있음을 알 수 있다. 새정부 들어서서 전개되고 있는 기록관리에 관한 제정책들이 우려를 낳게 하는 것이지만, 어찌보면 이는 지난 정부의 소산이기도 하다. 따라서 새정부가 지난 정부에서 이루지 못했던 기록관리기구의 정치적 독립성을 제도적으로 마련하고, 전문인력의 확충을 지방으로까지 확대시킨다면, 이는 새정부의 책임이자 나아가 업적이 될 수도 있을 것이다.