• 대한기계학회논문집B
• /
• 제27권11호
• /
• pp.1563-1571
• /
• 2003

This paper is the second part of several companion papers which compare the method of Air-fuel ratio(AFR) determination. In the previous paper, Eltinge chart was applied to the arbitrary fuel composition and the charts for gasoline, diesel, methanol, M85, liquefied petroleum gas(LPG), natural gas(NG), propane and butane were illustrated. In Eltinge chart, however, unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) is not used for determination of AFR. For improving accuracy, Eltinge suggested UHC compensation after the AFR reading in the chart. This compensation reduced the difference between real and reading value. In the compensation, however, the correction of oxygen and carbon dioxide is uncertain and there might be a mistake in conversion of UHC reading value. Therefore, the error is overestimated comparing with Spindt one which is most widely used. In addition, there is no comparison of the value with other useful methods. In this paper, the compensation of unburned HC was performed in Eltinge chart and the compensated value was compared with Spindts formula over wide range of AFR. The objects of investigating fuel are gasoline, methanol, NG and LPG. The result shows that Eltinge and Spindt method is flawlessly compatible and the difference between the two methods is under 0.3% in a λrange from 0.9 to 1.7. The method fur debugging instrumentation error is also presented.

• 한국화재소방학회논문지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2000

본 연구의 목적은 물액적에 의한 미연소면의 냉각 특성을 연구하는 것이다. 고온고체로는 황동, 탄소강, 동을 사용하였으며 온도범위는 $70^{\circ}$~$116^{\circ}$이다. 액적의 직경은 2.4 mm~3.0 mm로 하였다. CCD카메라를 이용하여 액적의 증발과성을 기록하였으며, 증발시간은 비디오에 기록된 프레임을 분신하여 추하였다. 열전도도가 가장 큰 동의 경우 액적이 떨어진 직후 조금 냉각되었다가 일정 온도를 유지하지만 열전도도가 낯은 탄소강의 경우는 증발시간 동안 약 $1^{\circ}$ 정도의 온도 기울기가 나타났다. 고체 표면에서의 액적 증발시 무차원 액적체적은 가열체의 재질에 상관없이 무차원 증밭시간이 증가할수록 선형적으로 감소한다.

• 대한기계학회논문집B
• /
• 제27권11호
• /
• pp.1548-1562
• /
• 2003

This paper is the first of several companion papers which compare the methods of Air-fuel ratio determination. There are many methods which calculate Air-Fuel ratio from exhaust emission. Most of them are based on the simple chemical equations, which use balance of atom, and the error of the calculation is negligible as far as the instrumentation accuracy is guaranteed. They assume homogeneous mixture and complete combustion to the extent of oxygen availability. Because of these simple assumptions, they cannot offer the information about the fuel distribution state and the malfunction of instrument. For these limitations, Eltinge offered new one based on stricter mathematical model. This result coincides with the others very well and gives more information about the mixture state and instrumentation. Consequently this might be a general solution for Air-fuel ratio determination and exhaust composition. The objects of the calculation, however, were not commercial fuels except gasoline and the compensation method of unburned hydrocarbon was not appropriate to recent analyzer. Moreover he did not consider the fuel which contains oxygen, such as methanol, ethanol and blend of gasoline-alcohol. In this paper, Eltinge chart is expanded to the arbitrary fuel composition as the reference exhaust compositions for the purpose of further discussions about Air-fuel ratio determination methods and the charts fur gasoline, diesel, methanol, M85, liquefied petroleum gas(LPG), natural gas(NG), propane, butane are illustrated.