• 한국응용곤충학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.147-159
• /
• 1983

In general, herbicides have been classified according to selectivity, mobility. time of application, methods of application, mode of action and chemical property and structure. However, there was no generally accepted classification system for practical use in the field. The primary processes affected by the majority of herbicides are the growth process through cell elongation and/or cell division, the photosynthetic process specifically the light reaction, the oxidative phosphorylation and the integrity of the membrane systems. The usual approach in the study of the mechanism by which herbicides kill or inhibit the growth of plants is to initially determine the morphological phototoxicity systems, The mechanism by which a herbicide kills a plant or suppresses its development is actually the resultant effect of primary and secondary(or side) effects. In most instances, the death of the plant is due to the secondary effects. To induce the desired response, a herbicide must be able to gain entry into the plants and once inside, to be transported within the plant to its site(s) of activity in concentrations great enough. Obstacles to the entry and movement of herbicides in plants are generally classified by leaf and soil obstacles, translocation obstacles and biochemical obstacles, and these obstacles are also strongly influenced by plant species and by environmental factors such as light, temperature, rainfall and relative humidity. And hence, in most instances, results obtained from laboratory or greenhous vary from those of field experiment. Author attempted to classify herbicides from the field experiment using the two-dimensional ordination analysis to obtain practical information for selecting effective herbicides or to choose effective herbicide combinations for increasing herbicidal efficacy or reducing the chemical cost. Based on this two-dimensional diagram, desired herbicides or combinations were selected and further investigated for the interaction effects whether these combinations are synergistic, additive or antagonistic. From the results, it was concluded that these new approach could possibly be give more comprehensive informations about effective use of herbicide than any other systems.

• 한국잡초학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.67-74
• /
• 1990

1989년(年)9월(月) 낙농강유역(洛東江流域) 38지점(地點)에서 총(總) 29과(科) 102종(種)의 잡초(雜草)가 조사(調査)되었다. 그 가운데 일년생(一年生) 광엽잡초(廣葉雜草)가 54%, 다년생(多年生) 광엽잡초(廣葉雜草)가 21%로 광엽잡초(廣葉雜草)가 전체(全體)의 72%를 점유(占有)하였다. 2차원적(次元的) 분류방법(分類方法)으로 환삼덩쿨(Humulus japonicum)군락(群落), 여뀌(Persicaria hydropiper)군락(群落), 고마리(Persicaria thunbergii)군락(群落), 사철쑥(Artemisia capillaris)군락(群落), 개여뀌 - 강아지풀 - 바랭이(Persicaria blumei - Setaria viridis - Digitaria sanguinalis)군락(群落), 갈대(Phragmites communis)군락(群落)이 조사(調査)되었다. 가장 큰 군락(群落)은 갈대 군락(群落)이었고, 총(總) 38 조사지점중(調査地點中) 15지점(地點)에서 갈대가 발생(發生)되었고 고마리, 환삼덩쿨, 개여뀌 등(等)의 잡초(雜草)들이 우점발생(優點發生)하였다.