• 제목/요약/키워드: triple labor market

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.017초

근로빈곤층의 빈곤탈출 결정요인 연구 : 근로빈곤노동시장의 경로제약성을 중심으로 (The Determinants of Working Poor' Poverty-Exit Possibility : Path Dependency of Working Poor Labor Market)

  • 지은정
    • 한국사회복지학
    • /
    • 제59권3호
    • /
    • pp.147-174
    • /
    • 2007
  • 본 연구는 내부노동시장 및 외부노동시장과 분절된 근로빈곤노동시장의 경로제약성이 취업과 취업의 질에 누적적인 영향을 미쳐, 장기간 근로빈곤노동시장에 머물게 함으로써 근로빈곤탈출을 저해하는 악순환의 고리가 되는지 분석하였다. 자료는 한국노동패널 $3{\sim}7$차이고, 분석방법은 Markov 이행확률과 이산시간분석을 활용하였다. 분석결과 우리나라 노동시장은 내부노동시장과 외부노동시장 그리고 근로빈곤노동시장의 삼중 구조로 이루어져 있었다. 근로빈곤유형은 최근으로 올수록 취업빈곤층은 계속 감소하는 반면, 비경활 빈곤층은 점점 증가하여 근로빈곤층의 주된 유형이 되었다. 근본적으로 빈곤층에 대한 노동수요가 부족하며, 빈곤층의 취업자체를 저해하는 노동시장의 구조적 장벽이 존재함을 볼 수 있다. 회귀분석에서는 근로빈곤노동시장 참여기간이 길어질수록 근로빈곤 이탈률이 감소하였다. 이는 한번 근로빈곤노동시장에 편입되면 그 굴레를 벗어나지 못하고 근로빈곤노동시장 내에서 폐쇄적으로 이동하여, 다시 빈곤으로 연결되는 악순환을 보여주는 것이다. 따라서 적절한 근로조건을 보장하는 노동수요 활성화정책과, 근본적인 노동시장구조 개혁 및 빈곤층 노동에 대한 부정적 사회인식과 차별완화 정책이 필요하다.

  • PDF

사회적기업은 괜찮은 여성일자리인가? (Does Social Enterprise Provide a Decent Work to Women?)

  • 곽선화
    • 경영과정보연구
    • /
    • 제32권4호
    • /
    • pp.53-79
    • /
    • 2013
  • 사회서비스는 서구 자본주의 국가를 중심으로 높은 실업과 복지에 대한 국가지출 축소 등의 문제에 대응하고 성장과 분배의 선순환 구조를 이룩하기 위해 일자리창출정책과 연계되어 논의가 시작되었다. 특히 사회서비스는 여성노동력이 비교우위를 기대할 수 있는 분야이고 비교적 괜찮은 일자리라는 점에서 주목받고 있다. 양질의 사회서비스 제공과 지속가능한 일자리 창출을 목표로 하는 사회적기업은 여성친화성이 높아 여성일자리의 새로운 대안으로 기능할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 사회적기업이 실제 여성에게 괜찮은 일자리를 제공하고 있는지를 살펴보았다. 사회적기업 491개소 전체를 대상으로 한 조직수준 분석에서는 종단분석을 통해 사회적기업에서의 여성 참여율, 조직내 지위와 안정성, 임금수준 등에 대해 성별 비교분석을 하였다. 사회적기업 종사자 830명을 대상으로 한 개인수준 분석에서는 횡단분석을 통해 사회적기업 진입이전 상태를 비롯하여 일자리 만족도와 일자리 지속희망도에 대해 성별 비교분석을 하였다. 분석 결과, 사회적기업에서 여성의 비중은 70% 수준이며 특히 40대 이상 중장년층과 취약계층 여성의 참여가 높은 편이었다. 여성의 임금수준은 남성의 85~95% 수준으로 일반기업체와 비교할 때 임금격차가 거의 없는 일자리로 나타났다. 그러나 사회적기업에서 여성 일자리는 업종을 불문하고 비정규직과 비관리직에 집중되어 있었다. 이는 여성의 경력단절과 직업경험 부족 등에서 기인한 것으로 보인다. 사회적기업 여성근로자, 특히 취약계층 여성일수록 현재의 일자리를 지속하고자 욕구가 강한 것으로 나타났다. 조직수준 및 개인수준 분석 결과를 종합해 볼 때, 사회적기업은 괜찮은 여성일자리를 제공하고 있는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 그러나 향후 사회적기업 여성근로자의 고용안정성을 높여 여성의 경력이 유지 개발될 수 있도록 하고 여성 개인의 역량 향상이 사회적기업 경쟁력으로 연계되도록 방안을 마련할 필요가 있다.

  • PDF

불량환경하(不良環境下)에서의 제초제(除草劑) 약해(藥害)와 경감기술(輕減技術) (Herbicidal Phytotoxicity under Adverse Environments and Countermeasures)

  • 권용웅;황형식;강병화
    • 한국잡초학회지
    • /
    • 제13권4호
    • /
    • pp.210-233
    • /
    • 1993
  • The herbicide has become indispensable as much as nitrogen fertilizer in Korean agriculture from 1970 onwards. It is estimated that in 1991 more than 40 herbicides were registered for rice crop and treated to an area 1.41 times the rice acreage ; more than 30 herbicides were registered for field crops and treated to 89% of the crop area ; the treatment acreage of 3 non-selective foliar-applied herbicides reached 2,555 thousand hectares. During the last 25 years herbicides have benefited the Korean farmers substantially in labor, cost and time of farming. Any herbicide which causes crop injury in ordinary uses is not allowed to register in most country. Herbicides, however, can cause crop injury more or less when they are misused, abused or used under adverse environments. The herbicide use more than 100% of crop acreage means an increased probability of which herbicides are used wrong or under adverse situation. This is true as evidenced by that about 25% of farmers have experienced the herbicide caused crop injury more than once during last 10 years on authors' nationwide surveys in 1992 and 1993 ; one-half of the injury incidences were with crop yield loss greater than 10%. Crop injury caused by herbicide had not occurred to a serious extent in the 1960s when the herbicides fewer than 5 were used by farmers to the field less than 12% of total acreage. Farmers ascribed about 53% of the herbicidal injury incidences at their fields to their misuses such as overdose, careless or improper application, off-time application or wrong choice of the herbicide, etc. While 47% of the incidences were mainly due to adverse natural conditions. Such misuses can be reduced to a minimum through enhanced education/extension services for right uses and, although undesirable, increased farmers' experiences of phytotoxicity. The most difficult primary problem arises from lack of countermeasures for farmers to cope with various adverse environmental conditions. At present almost all the herbicides have"Do not use!" instructions on label to avoid crop injury under adverse environments. These "Do not use!" situations Include sandy, highly percolating, or infertile soils, cool water gushing paddy, poorly draining paddy, terraced paddy, too wet or dry soils, days of abnormally cool or high air temperature, etc. Meanwhile, the cultivated lands are under poor conditions : the average organic matter content ranges 2.5 to 2.8% in paddy soil and 2.0 to 2.6% in upland soil ; the canon exchange capacity ranges 8 to 12 m.e. ; approximately 43% of paddy and 56% of upland are of sandy to sandy gravel soil ; only 42% of paddy and 16% of upland fields are on flat land. The present situation would mean that about 40 to 50% of soil applied herbicides are used on the field where the label instructs "Do not use!". Yet no positive effort has been made for 25 years long by government or companies to develop countermeasures. It is a really sophisticated social problem. In the 1960s and 1970s a subside program to incoporate hillside red clayish soil into sandy paddy as well as campaign for increased application of compost to the field had been operating. Yet majority of the sandy soils remains sandy and the program and campaign had been stopped. With regard to this sandy soil problem the authors have developed a method of "split application of a herbicide onto sandy soil field". A model case study has been carried out with success and is introduced with key procedure in this paper. Climate is variable in its nature. Among the climatic components sudden fall or rise in temperature is hardly avoidable for a crop plant. Our spring air temperature fluctuates so much ; for example, the daily mean air temperature of Inchon city varied from 6.31 to $16.81^{\circ}C$ on April 20, early seeding time of crops, within${\times}$2Sd range of 30 year records. Seeding early in season means an increased liability to phytotoxicity, and this will be more evident in direct water-seeding of rice. About 20% of farmers depend on the cold underground-water pumped for rice irrigation. If the well is deep over 70m, the fresh water may be about $10^{\circ}C$ cold. The water should be warmed to about $20^{\circ}C$ before irrigation. This is not so practiced well by farmers. In addition to the forementioned adverse conditions there exist many other aspects to be amended. Among them the worst for liquid spray type herbicides is almost total lacking in proper knowledge of nozzle types and concern with even spray by the administrative, rural extension officers, company and farmers. Even not available in the market are the nozzles and sprayers appropriate for herbicides spray. Most people perceive all the pesticide sprayers same and concern much with the speed and easiness of spray, not with correct spray. There exist many points to be improved to minimize herbicidal phytotoxicity in Korea and many ways to achieve the goal. First of all it is suggested that 1) the present evaluation of a new herbicide at standard and double doses in registration trials is to be an evaluation for standard, double and triple doses to exploit the response slope in making decision for approval and recommendation of different dose for different situation on label, 2) the government is to recognize the facts and nature of the present problem to correct the present misperceptions and to develop an appropriate national program for improvement of soil conditions, spray equipment, extention manpower and services, 3) the researchers are to enhance researches on the countermeasures and 4) the herbicide makers/dealers are to correct their misperceptions and policy for sales, to develop database on the detailed use conditions of consumer one by one and to serve the consumers with direct counsel based on the database.

  • PDF