• 한국직업건강간호학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.193-211
• /
• 1999

This study was carried out to investigate the management and support system affecting to the occupational health nursing services(OHNS) provided in group occupational health agencies(GOHA). Questionnaire was developed and distributed to 82 nurses who were working in GOHA and who agreed to participate in the survey. The results were as follow: 1. OH nurses responded were mostly in the age of twenty to thirties(89%), married(73.7%), technical college graduates(88.9%), worked in hospital(85.4%) and participated more than 1 year in group occupational health services (96.3%). 2. Fifty eight point four percent of the OH nurses worked in number of workplace more than 30 to less than 60 in the OHNS form. The figure of workplaces undertaken by nurses was ranged greatly from 9 to more than 100. Number of employees who cared by nurses were mostly under 5,000 peoples in 93.3%. The types of industry was mostly manufacturing and located in the order of factory complex area, suburban, urban and others. 3. Most OH nurses(87.8%) were fully involved in the OHNS for the SSE. Their working days to visit SSE was 5 days per week(77.8%) and one day in the GOHA at 41.3%. 4. The OH documents using by nurses were found in more than 23 different types. However, they were largely summarized in the types of 'Workplace Health Management Card', 'Personal Health Counselling Card', 'Daily Health Management Report', 'Visiting List of Workplace' and 'Sick Employee List'. 5. The items of laboratory test provided by GOHA were mostly achieved in the purpose of basic health examination. They were used to be the blood pressure check(98.8%), blood sugar test (98.8%), urine sugar and protein(91.4%), SGOT and SGPT(85.3% each), cholesterol (82.9%), hepa vaccine immunization(82.9%), r-GPT(81.7%), hemoglobin(79.3%) and triglyceride(75.5%). 6. The OH nurses(92.7%) followed the work pattern to visit the GOHA before and after small-scale enterprises(SSE) visit by car driven by nurses in 74.3%. They were payed by GOHA for transportation fees in certain amounts. However, nurse is the main person(75.0%) who covers up in case of traffic accident. If the GOHA has no transportation regulation for the formal workplace visit, data showed that nurses had been responsible to take charge(31.7%). 7. The personnel manager who takes in charge for nursing services was 'nurse' in 61.7% and 41.2% worked as the final decision maker related to nursing work. The OH nurses' opinions about factors affecting to the management were classified in the four areas such as 'Nature(Quality) of health professional'. 'Content of OHNS', 'Delivery system of the GOHS', and 'Others'. The factors were indicated highly in 'Authority as health professional', 'Level of perception of director on the OH' and 'Physical work condition for OHNS'. The things that this study suggests in the recommendation would be summarized in such as the management and supporting system working for SSE in the OHNS is necessary to reform thoroughly. The reconsidered aspects might be in the matters of number of workplaces undertaken by nurses, development of effectively practical health documents, preparation for guideline of the laboratory test in the workpleces, establishment of convenient and encouraging support system and cooperation between other health professionals with respect and skill.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.360-373
• /
• 2017

국내 민간투자사업의 추진 방식 중 수익형 민간투자사업은 수요 위험이 존재하는 방식이다. 수요 위험이 현실화 될 경우 민간사업자는 예상보다 낮은 수입으로 인해 재무적인 어려움을 겪으며, 정부도 안정적인 사회기반시설 운영에 차질을 빚을 수 있다. 따라서 정부는 수요 위험에 따른 위험 분담 정책을 다양하게 적용해 오고 있다. 하지만 정부의 위험 분담은 수요의 불확실성으로 인한 정부의 우발채무이며, 실시협약의 문구로 표현되어 기존의 전통적인 사업평가 방식인 NPV 방식으로는 위험을 계량화 할 수 없다. 본 연구는 수요 위험 분담 정책의 하나로 2015년에 도입된 손익공유형 방식(BTO-a)을 대상으로 수요 위험을 고려한 정부의 투자위험 분담 가치를 산정하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 투자위험 분담은 금융에서의 옵션(option) 형태를 갖게 된다. 민간사업자는 수입이 감소했을 때 정부로 부터 보조금을 청구할 권리를 가지고 있으며, 반대로 정부는 일정 조건하에서 보조금을 지급할 의무를 가지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 Black-Scholes 옵션가격결정 모형을 활용하여 투자위험 분담의 가치추정 방법론을 정립하고 사례 사업을 통해 결과의 적정성을 살펴보았다. 사례 사업은 제안된 고속도로 민간투자사업을 대상으로 하였으며, 분석결과 투자위험 분담 가치는 약 120억원으로 추정되어 민간이 투자한 투자비의 약 4%를 차지하는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 정부가 투자위험을 분담함으로써 120억원의 재정지원을 추가로 투입하는 효과로 볼 수 있다. 교통량 위험을 확률변수로 가정할 경우 사례사업에서 도출된 옵션가치는 평균이 122억원이고 표준편차는 36.7억원으로 도출되었다. 누적분포를 도출한 결과 90% 확률 구간의 옵션가치가 69억원에서 188억원의 범위에서 결정될 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 방법은 미래수요의 불확실성하에서 정부와 민간사업자가 더 나은 위험 분석과 투자위험 분담에 대한 경제적인 가치를 이해하는데 도움을 줄 것으로 기대한다.