• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.1889-1894
• /
• 2013

Background: Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (BSCCE) is a rare and distinctive tumor with no standard treatment. This study aimed to explore treatment in relation to prognosis of the disease. Methods: A total of 142 patients with BSCCE that underwent treatment in our hospital from March 1999 to July 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received surgery, 42 postoperative radiotherapy and 28 patients chemotherapy. Results: There were 26 patients included in stage I, 60 in stage II, 53 in stage III and 3 in stage IV. The clinical symptoms and macroscopic performances of BSCCE did not differ from those of typical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Among 118 patients receiving endoscopic biopsy, only 12 were diagnosed with BSCCE. The median survival time (MST) of the entire group was 32 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 81.4%, 46.8% and 31.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS of stage I and II patients was significantly longer than that of stages III/IV, at 60.3%, 36.1% and 10.9%, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.001). The MST and 5-year OS were 59.0 months and 47.4% in patients with tumors located in the lower thoracic esophagus, and 27.0 months and 18.1% in those with lesions in the upper/middle esophagus (p=0.002). However, the survival was not significantly improved in patients undegoing adjunctive therapy. Multivariate analysis showed TNM stage and tumor location to be independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, distant metastasis was the most frequent failure pattern, with a median recurrence time of 10 months. Conclusion: BSCCE is an aggressive disease with rapid progression and a propensity for distant metastasis. It is difficult to make a definitive diagnosis via preoperative biopsy. Multidisciplinary therapy including radical esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy should be recommended, while the effectiveness of radiochemotherapy requires further validation for BSCCE.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.10-18
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to determine if international guidelines differ in their recommendations concerning additive therapy for advanced, but potentially curable, gastric cancer. A systematic search of the English and German literature was conducted in the databases Medline, Cochrane Database, Embase, and PubMed. The search terms used were 'guidelines gastric cancer,' 'guidelines stomach cancer,' and 'Leitlinien Magenkarzinom.' Six different guidelines published after January 1, 2010, in which the tumors were classified according to the seventh edition of the TNM system (2010), were identified. Although the examined guidelines were based on the same study results, their recommendations concerning accompanying therapy for gastric cancer differ considerably. While perioperative chemotherapy is recommended in Germany, Great Britain, and large parts of Europe, postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy is recommended in the USA and Canada. In Japan, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. The results of identical studies were interpreted differently in different countries. Since considerable effort is required for each country to separately test relevant studies for their validity and suitability, an international cooperation could simplify the creation of a common basis for guidelines and contribute to improved comparability of international guidelines.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권20호
• /
• pp.8591-8594
• /
• 2014

Background: Lung cancer is the most common cancer in males worldwide. The principal mode of treatment in the early stage of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery. However, five-year survival is only about 15% for all stages. The aim is to investigate the effect of daily low dose cisplatin concurrently with radiation therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with poor performance status. Materials and Methods: Ten patients diagnosed as inoperable Stage IIIB NSCLC with comorbid disease were assessed retrospectively in Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, between 2011 to 2013. ECOG performance status was between 3 and 4. Cisplatin was administered at $6mg/m^2$ daily, for 5 days a week concurrently with radiotherapy using 160-200 cGy daily fractions, 54 Gy being the lowest and 63 Gy being the highest dose. Results: Complete response at the primary tumour site was obtained in 20% patients. Grade I esophagitis was seen 70 percent of patients, and the grade II haematological toxicity rate was 20 %. Median survival time was 7 months. Conclusions: Median survival time was reasonable, despite the patients ECOG performance status of 3-4, which is similar to groups even without comorbid disorders in comparison to other published papers in the literature. Acceptable toxicity, high response rates and quality of life of patients are the other favourable features.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.160-169
• /
• 2007

목적 : 본 연구는 국소 진행된 식도암 환자들에 대하여 수술 전 동시병용 방사선-항암 화학요법을 적용한 치료 성적과 예후인자에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1998년 3월부터 2005년 5월까지 삼성서울병원에서 식도암으로 진단 받고 수술 전 동시병용 방사선 항암화학요법을 적용한 환자는 모두 68명이었다. 이들 중 원발병변이 흉곽 내 식도에 위치하고, 조직형이 편평상피암이며 임상병기가 T3이상 또는 Nl이상 또는 혈행성 원격전이 없이 절제 가능한원격 림프절에 전이가 국한되어있는 M1A/B병기이며 다른 내과적 질환이나 이차암이 없는 61명의 환자들에 대해 분석을 시행하였다. 방사선치료는 임상 정사 등으로 확인된 병변에 대하여 5주 동안 45 Gy를 조사하였고, 항암화학요법은 2주기의 5-FU (1,000 $mg/m^{2}/day$, days 1-4 & 29-32)와 Cisplatin (60 $mg/m^{2}/day$, days l & 29)을 방사선치료와 동시에 병용하였다. 수술은 방사선-항암화학요법 종료 후 $4{\sim}6$주경에 계획하였으며 53명에 대해 lvor-Lewis 술기와 2-영역 혹은 3-영역 림프절 적출술을 시행하였다. 결과: 57명이 예정된 방사선-항암화학요법을 완료하였고(93.4%) 수술을 거부하거나 수술 전 방사선-항암화학요법 중 질병이 진행된 8명의 환자를 제외한 53명(86.8%)에서 식도 절제술을 시행하였는데, 이 중 49명(92.6%)에서 완전절제가 가능하였으며 38명(71.6%)에서 병기하강을 얻을 수 있었고, 17명(32.0%)에서 병리학적 완전 관해를 얻었다. 1명이 수술 후 호흡기 합병증으로, 1명이 방사선 병용 항암화학치료 연관 폐렴으로 사망하여 치료 연관 사망률은 3.2%였다. 전체 61명의 중앙 생존기간은 30개월, 2년 및 5년 생존율은 각각 59.0%와 38.0%였으며 수술을 시행 한 53명의 중앙 생존기간은 37개월, 2년 및 5년 생존율은 각각 61.6%와 40.1%없고, 중앙 무병 생존기간은 24개월, 2년 및 5년 무병생존율은 각각 53.3%와 41.8%였다. 전체 환자의 생존율에 영향을 미치는 예후인자는 수술 여부없으며 수술을 시행한 환자의 생존율이 단변량 분석(p=0.03)과 다변량 분석(p<0.01)에서 수술을 시행하지 않은 환자의 생존율에 비해 높았다. 수술을 시행한 환자를 대상으로 한 단변량 분석 결과 수술 전 임상병기가 IV병기가 아닌 경우, 수술 후 병리학적 완전관해를 얻은 경우 유의하게 생존율과 무병생존율이 높았으나 다변량 분석에서 의미 있는 예후인자는 없었다. 수술을 시행한 53명 중 5명(9.4%)에서 국소재발이, 10명(18.8%)에서 국소재발 및 원격전이가, 12명(22.6%)에서 원격전이가 발생하였다. 결론: 국소 진행된 병기의 식도암에서 수술 전 동시병용 방사선-항암화학요법으로 양호한 병기 하강률, 장기 생존율을 얻을 수 있었고 원격 림프절 전이가 없는 경우, 수술 후 병리학적 완전관해를 얻은 경우에서 높은 장기 생존율을 보였다.