• 제목/요약/키워드: theory of architecture

검색결과 1,232건 처리시간 0.021초

분산 실시간 서비스를 위한 TMO 객체그룹 모델의 구축 (A Construction of TMO Object Group Model for Distributed Real-Time Services)

  • 신창선;김명희;주수종
    • 한국정보과학회논문지:시스템및이론
    • /
    • 제30권5_6호
    • /
    • pp.307-318
    • /
    • 2003
  • 본 논문에서는 분산 객체 컴퓨팅 환경에서 보장된 실시간 서비스를 지원하는 TMO 객체그룹(TMO Object Group) 모델을 설계ㆍ구축하고, 우리 모델의 정확한 분산 실시간 서비스 수행능력을 검증 한다. 우리가 제안한 TMO 객체그룹은 TINA(Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture) 의 객체그룹 개념을 기반으로, 실시간 특성을 가지는 TMO(Time-triggered Message-triggered Object) 객체들과 객체그룹 내의 객체 관리 서비스(Object Management Service), 실시간 스케줄링 서비스(Real-Time Scheduling Service)를 지원하는 컴포넌트들로 구성된다. 또한, TMO 객체는 분산 시스템에 비중복 또는 중복으로 존재할 수 있다. 본 모델은 특정 ORB나 운영체제들의 제약 없이 COTS(Commercial Off-The-Shelf) 미들웨어 상에서 보장된 분산 실시간 서비스를 수행한다. TMO 객체그룹을 구축하기 위해 TMO 객체의 개념과 TMO 객체그룹의 구조를 정의하였고, 객체그룹 내의 컴포넌트들의 기능과 그들간의 상호작용을 설계 구현하였다. TMO 객체그룹은 객체 관리 서비스와 실시간 스케줄링 서비스 지원을 위해 동적바인더객체(Dynamic Binder Object)와 스케줄러객체(Scheduler Object)를 각각 가진다. 동적바인더객체는 클라이언트들의 요청에 대해 중복 TMO 객체 중 적정 객체를 선정하는 동적 바인딩 서비스를 지원하고, 스케쥴러객체는 클라이언트들의 서비스 요청에 대해 TMO 객체가 수행해야 할 작업들의 우선순위를 정하는 실시간 스케줄링 서비스를 지원한다. TMO 객체그룹의 수행 검증을 위해 이미 연구된 알고리즘을 확장한 동적 바인딩 서비스를 위한 바인딩 우선순위(Binding Priority) 알고리즘과 실시간 스케줄링 서비스를 위한 EDF(Earliest Deadline First) 알고리즘을 적용하여 동적바인더객체와 스케쥴러객체를 구현했다. 마지막으로 수치 분석을 통해 TMO 객체그룹이 비중복/중복 TMO 객체의 동적 바인딩 서비스와 클라이언트들의 요청을 받는 임의의 TMO 객체에서 실시간 스케줄링 서비스를 지원하는지 검증했다.

포항(浦項) 및 장기분지(盆地)에 대한 고지자기(古地磁氣), 층서(層序) 및 구조연구(構造硏究); 화산암류(火山岩類)의 K-Ar 연대(年代) (Paleomagnetism, Stratigraphy and Geologic Structure of the Tertiary Pohang and Changgi Basins; K-Ar Ages for the Volcanic Rocks)

  • 이현구;문희수;민경덕;김인수;윤혜수;이타야 테츠마루
    • 자원환경지질
    • /
    • 제25권3호
    • /
    • pp.337-349
    • /
    • 1992
  • The Tertiary basins in Korea have widely been studied by numerous researchers producing individual results in sedimentology, paleontology, stratigraphy, volcanic petrology and structural geology, but interdisciplinary studies, inter-basin analysis and basin-forming process have not been carried out yet. Major work of this study is to elucidate evidences obtained from different parts of a basin as well as different Tertiary basins (Pohang, Changgi, Eoil, Haseo and Ulsan basins) in order to build up the correlation between the basins, and an overall picture of the basin architecture and evolution in Korea. According to the paleontologic evidences the geologic age of the Pohang marine basin is dated to be late Lower Miocence to Middle Miocene, whereas other non-marine basins are older as being either Early Miocene or Oligocene(Lee, 1975, 1978: Bong, 1984: Chun, 1982: Choi et al., 1984: Yun et al., 1990: Yoon, 1982). However, detailed ages of the Tertiary sediments, and their correlations in a basin and between basins are still controversial, since the basins are separated from each other, sedimentary sequence is disturbed and intruded by voncanic rocks, and non-marine sediments are not fossiliferous to be correlated. Therefore, in this work radiometric, magnetostratigraphic, and biostratigraphic data was integrated for the refinement of chronostratigraphy and synopsis of stratigraphy of Tertiary basins of Korea. A total of 21 samples including 10 basaltic, 2 porphyritic, and 9 andesitic rocks from 4 basins were collected for the K-Ar dating of whole rock method. The obtained age can be grouped as follows: $14.8{\pm}0.4{\sim}15.2{\pm}0.4Ma$, $19.9{\pm}0.5{\sim}22.1{\pm}0.7Ma$, $18.0{\pm}1.1{\sim}20.4+0.5Ma$, and $14.6{\pm}0.7{\sim}21.1{\pm}0.5Ma$. Stratigraphically they mostly fall into the range of Lower Miocene to Mid Miocene. The oldest volcanic rock recorded is a basalt (911213-6) with the age of $22.05{\pm}0.67Ma$ near Sangjeong-ri in the Changgi (or Janggi) basin and presumed to be formed in the Early Miocene, when Changgi Conglomerate began to deposit. The youngest one (911214-9) is a basalt of $14.64{\pm}0.66Ma$ in the Haseo basin. This means the intrusive and extrusive rocks are not a product of sudden voncanic activity of short duration as previously accepted but of successive processes lasting relatively long period of 8 or 9 Ma. The radiometric age of the volcanic rocks is not randomly distributed but varies systematically with basins and localities. It becomes generlly younger to the south, namely from the Changgi basin to the Haseo basin. The rocks in the Changgi basin are dated to be from $19.92{\pm}0.47$ to $22.05{\pm}0.67Ma$. With exception of only one locality in the Geumgwangdong they all formed before 20 Ma B.P. The Eoil basalt by Tateiwa in the Eoil basin are dated to be from $20.44{\pm}0.47$ to $18.35{\pm}0.62Ma$ and they are younger than those in the Changgi basin by 2~4 Ma. Specifically, basaltic rocks in the sedimentary and voncanic sequences of the Eoil basin can be well compared to the sequence of associated sedimentary rocks. Generally they become younger to the stratigraphically upper part. Among the basin, the Haseo basin is characterized by the youngest volcanic rocks. The basalt (911214-7) which crops out in Jeongja-ri, Gangdong-myon, Ulsan-gun is $16.22{\pm}0.75Ma$ and the other one (911214-9) in coastal area, Jujon-dong, Ulsan is $14.64{\pm}0.66Ma$ old. The radiometric data are positively collaborated with the results of paleomagnetic study, pull-apart basin model and East Sea spreading theory. Especially, the successively changing age of Eoil basalts are in accordance with successively changing degree of rotation. In detail, following results are discussed. Firstly, the porphyritic rocks previously known as Cretaceous basement (911213-2, 911214-1) show the age of $43.73{\pm}1.05$$49.58{\pm}1.13Ma$(Eocene) confirms the results of Jin et al. (1988). This means sequential volcanic activity from Cretaceous up to Lower Tertiary. Secondly, intrusive andesitic rocks in the Pohang basin, which are dated to be $21.8{\pm}2.8Ma$ (Jin et al., 1988) are found out to be 15 Ma old in coincindence with the age of host strata of 16.5 Ma. Thirdly, The Quaternary basalt (911213-5 and 911213-6) of Tateiwa(1924) is not homogeneous regarding formation age and petrological characteristics. The basalt in the Changgi basin show the age of $19.92{\pm}0.47$ and $22.05{\pm}0.67$ (Miocene). The basalt (911213-8) in Sangjond-ri, which intruded Nultaeri Trachytic Tuff is dated to be $20.55{\pm}0.50Ma$, which means Changgi Group is older than this age. The Yeonil Basalt, which Tateiwa described as Quaternary one shows different age ranging from Lower Miocene to Upper Miocene(cf. Jin et al., 1988: sample no. 93-33: $10.20{\pm}0.30Ma$). Therefore, the Yeonil Quarterary basalt should be revised and divided into different geologic epochs. Fourthly, Yeonil basalt of Tateiwa (1926) in the Eoil basin is correlated to the Yeonil basalt in the Changgi basin. Yoon (1989) intergrated both basalts as Eoil basaltic andesitic volcanic rocks or Eoil basalt (Yoon et al., 1991), and placed uppermost unit of the Changgi Group. As mentioned above the so-called Quarternary basalt in the Eoil basin are not extruded or intruaed simultaneously, but differentiatedly (14 Ma~25 Ma) so that they can not be classified as one unit. Fifthly, the Yongdong-ri formation of the Pomgogri Group is intruded by the Eoil basalt (911214-3) of 18.35~0.62 Ma age. Therefore, the deposition of the Pomgogri Group is completed before this age. Referring petrological characteristics, occurences, paleomagnetic data, and relationship to other Eoil basalts, it is most provable that this basalt is younger than two others. That means the Pomgogri Group is underlain by the Changgi Group. Sixthly, mineral composition of the basalts and andesitic rocks from the 4 basins show different ground mass and phenocryst. In volcanic rocks in the Pohang basin, phenocrysts are pyroxene and a small amount of biotite. Those of the Changgi basin is predominant by Labradorite, in the Eoil by bytownite-anorthite and a small amount pyroxene.

  • PDF