• 기록학연구
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.276-322
• /
• 2004

Historical interest in China in 1930s has been mostly focused on political characteristic of the National Government(國民政府) which was established by the KMT(中國國民黨) as a result of national unification. It is certain that China had a chance to construct a modern country by the establishment of the very unified revolutionary government. But, it was the time of expanding national crises that threatened the existence of the country such as the Manchurian Incident and the Chinese-Japanese War as well as the chaos of the domestic situation, too. So it has a good reason to examine the characteristic and pattern of the response of the political powers of those days. But, as shown in the recent studies, the manifestation method of political power by the revolutionary regime catches our attention through the understanding of internal operating system. Though this writing started from the fact that the Nationalist Government executed the administrative reform which aimed at "administrative efficiency" in the middle of 1930s, but it put stress on the seriousness of the problem and its solution rather than political background or results. "Committee on Administrative Efficiency(行政效率委員會)", the center of administrative reform movement which was established in 1934, examined the plan to execute the reform through legislation by the Executive Council(行政院) on the basis of the results of relevant studies. They claimed that the construction of a modern country should be performed by not political revolution anymore but by gradual improvement and daily reform, and that the operation of the government should become modern, scientific and efficient. There were many fields of administrative reform subjects, but especially, the field of records and archives adminstration(文書檔案行政) was studied intensively from the initial stage because that subject had already been discussed intensively. They recognized that records and archives were the basic tool of work performance and general activity but an inefficient field in spite of many input staff members, and most of all, archival reform bring about less conflicts than the fields of finance, organization and personnel. When it comes to the field of records adminstration, the key subjects that records should be written simply, the process of record treatment should be clear and the delay of that should be prevented were already presented in a records administrative meeting in 1922. That is, the unified law about record management was not established, so each government organization followed a conventional custom or performed independent improvement. It was through the other records administrative workshop of the Nationalist Government in 1933 when the new trend was appeared as the unified system improvement. They decided to unify the format of official records, to use marker and section, to unify the registration of receipt records and dispatch records and to strengthen the examination of records treatment. But, the method of records treatment was not unified yet, so the key point of records administrative reform was to establish a unified and standard record management system for preventing repetition by simplifying the treatment procedure and for intensive treatment by exclusive organizations. From the foundation of the Republic of China to 1930s, there was not big change in the field of archives administration, and archives management methods were prescribed differently even in the same section as well as same department. Therefore, the point at issue was to centralize scattered management systems that were performed in each section, to establish unified standard about filing and retention period allowance and to improve searching system through classification and proper number allowance. Especially, the problem was that each number system and classification system bring about different result due to dual operation of record registration and archives registration, and that strict management through mutual contrast, searching and application are impossible. Besides, various problems such as filing tools, arrangement method, preservation facilities & equipment, lending service and use method were raised also. In the process this study for the system improvement of records and archives management, they recognized that records and archives are the identical thing and reached to create a successive management method of records and archives called "Records and Archives Chain Management Method(文書檔案連鎖法)" as a potential alternative. Several principles that records and archives management should be performed unitedly in each organization by the general record recipient section and the general archives section under the principle of task centralization, a consistent classification system should be used by classification method decided in advance according to organizational constitution and work functions and an identical number system should be used in the process of record management stage and archive management stage by using a card-type register were established. Though, this "Records and Archives Chain Management Method" was developed to the stage of test application in several organizations, but it was not adopted as a regular system and discontinued. That was because the administrative reform of the Nationalist Government was discontinued by the outbreak of the Chinese-Japanese War. Even though the administrative reform in the middle of 1930s didn't produce practical results but merely an experimentation, it was verified that the reform against tradition and custom conducted by the Nationalist Government that aimed for the construction of a modern country was not only a field of politics, but on the other hand, the weak basis of the government operation became the obstacle to the realization of the political power of the revolutionary regime. Though the subject of records and archives administrative reform was postponed to the future, it should be understood that the consciousness of modern records and archives administration and overall studies began through this examination of administrative reform.

• Journal of Information Processing Systems
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.173-187
• /
• 2022

A special government agency has been charged with implementing quality management to guarantee the quality of wild-simulated ginseng. However, these processes are carried out by use of documents, and this has resulted in information omission and high document management costs. To solve this problem, this study analyzed the existing quality management process by using a smart contract for the existing offline form and proposed a new quality management system for storing and managing all log data in the blockchain. This system reduced documentation management costs about quality management and recorded information in the previous step through the quality management steps, thus forming a step-by-step record chain. Experiments were conducted by implementing this system, which improved data integrity and reliability. Additionally, sensitive information, such as personal information, was included in the system by use of the off-chain technology.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제35호
• /
• pp.41-91
• /
• 2013

1996년 "공공기관의 정보공개에 관한 법률"과 1999년 "공공기관의 기록물관리에 관한 법률"의 제정을 통한 법률적 정비와 정부 차원에서 주도한 인프라 고도화의 노력 이후 많은 성장이 있었으나, 아직도 기록관리와 정보공개제도의 여러 측면에서 미흡한 점이 존재한다. 특히 정보공개제도를 통해 공개되는 기록정보가 신뢰할 만한가에 대한 문제의식과 그 신뢰성을 확보하기 위한 법률적 기술적 장치를 통한 제도적 기반은 전반적으로 미비한 실정이다. 법률의 제정 등 정부차원의 정보공개와 기록관리를 통한 국민의 알권리 보장, 국가 행정 참여 및 국가 기록정보자원의 활용 등을 위한 인프라 고도화 등 국가적으로 제도를 확립하려는 노력이 있었다. 그러나 제도의 확산과 더 많은 공개에만 초점이 맞추어져 내실이 부족하고 기록정보 자체의 영향력과 의미를 간과했다는 한계가 있다. 공개되는 많은 기록정보들은 공문서나 기안문 이외의 형태로 제공되거나 정보공개담당자에 의해 위조 변조 또는 발췌 가공되기도 한다. 또 정보공개 담당 인력의 부족 혹은 감독기관의 유명무실로 인해 일관성과 기준이 없는 공개 및 비공개 결정으로 혼란을 초래하기도 하며 정보공개 청구주체에 따른 임의 결정, 허위 답변이나 무응답 등 신뢰성을 훼손시키는 경우가 비일비재하다. 한편 정보공개 청구인의 모호한 청구, 또는 민원형태의 청구도 기록정보의 신뢰를 해치는 요인으로 들 수 있다. 따라서 관련 법률의 제 개정과 기관 및 인력의 정비를 통한 제도적 개선과 정보공개시스템 및 프로세스를 보완하고 정보공개에 대한 인식의 변화 등을 통해 기록정보의 신뢰성을 확보해야할 것이다. 즉 신뢰할 수 있는 기록정보를 통해 정부와 공공기관의 설명책임성(Accountability)이 보장되며 참된 의미의 거버넌스(governance) 행정이 가능해질 것이다. 기록정보(information)를 기록(records)과 유기적으로 인식하고 더 많은 정보의 공개와 외형적 제도 확립에만 주목했던 이전의 노력을 뛰어 넘어 향후 정보공개제도로 공개되는 기록정보의 신뢰성을 확보하기 위해 다양한 노력이 필요할 것이다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제39권2호
• /
• pp.95-130
• /
• 2008

본고는 전자기록 환경에서의 국가 평가체계 정비 방향을 모색하기 위한 시론적 연구로서의 의미를 지닌다. 전자기록 환경에서의 필연적인 평가방식이라 할 수 있는 기능평가는 국가적 차원의 영구보존 기록 선별에는 일정 한계를 지닌다. 이에 본고에서는 우선 기능평가가 지닌 한계를 논의한 다음, 이를 보완하기 위한 방안으로 영구보존 대상 평가전략의 필요성을 제기하였다. 그리고 이에 대한 구체적인 사례를 고찰하기 위해, 호주의 범정부 기능분석, 영구의 평가정책 및 수집정책, 독일의 다기관협력 평가전략, 캐나다의 거시평가 전략을 분석하였다. 결국 이러한 분석은 현용 가치와 사회적 가치가 조화된 국가 평가체계의 토대를 제공해주게 된다.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제20권
• /
• pp.85-113
• /
• 2007

This study came up with a comparison analysis between the average results of Whole National Cooperatives and Kyonggi cooperatives from 2000 to 2005. 15 Kyonggi Agricultural Cooperatives which are nearly the same in the aspects of size and local conditions, - Songpo, Shindo, Ilsan, Jido, Migum, Dongduchon, Bucheon, Ojeong, Naksaeng, Seongnam, Suwon, Kunja, Banweol, Ansan, Suji- are selected as comparable ones while the cooperatives of Kwangmyung, Kungpo, Anyang, Euiwang represent as Kwachon neighborhood cooperatives. The analysis result proposes some desirable ideas to activate the business of local cooperatives as follows. First, the top limit of allotting profits seem to require having the lower adjustment which takes into account the interest rates. Second, the system allotting the profits in proportion to the record of the use should be improved. Third, In order to activate the business of semi-members, allotting profit system in proportion to the record of the use should be established.

• 한국기록관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기록관리학회 2019년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.55-60
• /
• 2019

클라우드 기록관리시스템은 다음과 같은 문제점을 가지고 있다. 법제도의 변화없이 시스템 변화만 이뤄진 상태이고, 클라우드 기술의 장점을 전혀 활용하지 못하고 있다. 또한 시스템 도입 이후의 변화는 전혀 고민하지 않고 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해서는 법제도의 정비 및 국가기록관리 중장기 발전전략에 4차 산업혁명 내용을 반영해야 한다. 기록관리시스템 존재의 근본적인 검토도 필요하며 전자정부 추진 과정에서 국가기록원이 범정부 기록관리 컨트롤타워의 역할을 해야 한다.

• 대한조현병학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.10-16
• /
• 2016

Objectives : This article aims to describe the development of smartphone application for the case management of patients with schizophrenia. Methods : Gwangju Bukgu-Community Mental Health Center developed and launched a smartphone application (HYM) for cognitive-behavioral case management and symptom monitoring. The development of the application involved psychiatrists, nurses, social workers, psychologists, and software technicians from a software development company (Goosl Corp.). Results : The HYM application for clients includes six main modules including Thought record, Symptom record, Daily life record, Official notices, Communication, and Scales. The key module is the 'Thought Record' for self-directed cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT). When the client writes and sends the self-CBT sheet to the case manager, the latter receives a notification and can provide feedback in real time. 'Communication' and 'Official notices' are useful for promoting communication between case managers and clients with schizophrenia. Ratings in 'Symptom record', 'Daily life record', and 'Scales' modules are stored in graphic or table form representing changes in them and shared with case managers. Conclusion : The interactive function of this application is the key characteristics that distinguishes it from other mobile self-treatment tools. This smartphone application may contribute to the development of a youth- and customer-friendly case management system for individuals with early psychosis.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제78호
• /
• pp.153-195
• /
• 2023

RDBMS는 전 세계적으로 많이 사용하는 데이터베이스 시스템으로, 행정정보 데이터세트(이하 데이터세트)는 RDBMS를 이용하여 행정정보시스템에서 생산되는 방대한 규모의 데이터를 의미한다. 행정적인 문서 위주로 생산되는 업무시스템과는 달리 행정정보시스템은 기관의 고유한 업무 중심으로 기록들이 생산되고 있다. 이러한 기록들은 기존의 결재문서류와 메타데이터 등이 달라 표준기록관리시스템으로 이관이 쉽지 않다. 2022년 「공공기록물법 시행령」 개정으로 기록물의 관리권한만 이전하는 유형에 데이터세트가 포함되었고, 개정의 핵심 내용은 행정정보시스템에서 기록의 생애주기를 관리해야 하는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 그러나 현재까지는 행정정보시스템에서 데이터세트를 어떻게 관리해야 하는지 모색된 바는 없었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기록의 생애주기를 관리하기 위해 행정정보시스템에 탑재해야 하는 기록관리 모듈의 DB를 설계하고자 한다. ISO 16175-1:2020의 예시를 수정·보완하여 "인사관리시스템"을 설계하고, 인사관리 데이터세트를 식별 및 평가함으로써 행정정보시스템에서의 기록관리를 위한 구체적인 실행 예시를 보여주고자 한다. 본 연구에서 설계한 프로토타입 시스템이 실제 기관에서 사용하고 있는 시스템에 비해 데이터의 양이 적고, 기록관리 모듈의 DB가 헹정정보시스템에 적용 가능한지 현업에 계신 기록연구사분들과 IT 개발자들에게 검증을 받지 못한 한계점은 있다. 그러나, 예시를 통해서 데이터세트가 무엇인지 실체를 파악할 수 있었고, 행정정보시스템에서 데이터세트를 어떻게 관리해야 하는지 알 수 있었다. 그리고 행정정보시스템에서 기록관리 모듈의 필요성을 확인할 수 있었다. 향후 완전한 기록관리 모듈이 완성되고 국가기록원에서 기록관리 모듈에 대한 표준이 만들어진다면, 관련 기관에서 데이터세트를 관리하는데 필요한 모듈이 될 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제1호
• /
• pp.137-188
• /
• 2000

Korea was highly successful in maintaining a strong tradition of record preservation. However, Japanese imperialism and the Korean war over this century has seen a huge quantity of these once plentiful records either destroyed or relocated overseas. Many of Korea records remain in the custody of foreign archival institutions. Additionally, many records of foreign states concerned with korean affairs, for example, records of the Department of state, in the U.S.A., are of great relevance to Korean modern history. These records which exist in foreign countries are a necessary and invaluable resource in the advancement of Korea studies. After the 1980s, as research interest in Korean modern history increased gradually, much historical material related to Korea was extensively introduced, removed, collected from the U.S.A., Japan, Russia and China etc. by the efforts of pioneering scholars and institutions. Several attempts at collating and publishing this material have been made. Despite this encouraging result, individual scholars and institutions's efforts face problems in relation to removal of records. Firstly, it is repeated nonproductively to remove and collect the same records, for we didn't establish a comprehensive information system, through which the condition of foreign record removal and management is able to be administrated. Secondly, there is no system for arrangement, preservation, use of removed records. For example, finding aids, such as inventory, register, description, isn't prepared for user. A user may usually not understand an accurate context of their creation, preservation removal. Thirdly, almost institution has arranged the removed records among other materials and books. Each institution has a different classification criteria, too. These conditions seem to make a difficulty in national management. This study investigated how the materials for Korea history which has been removed from foreign countries should be managed for effective preservation and use. For these purpose, we investigated the present conditions of removal and management of these materials. Also, we investigated examples of the foreign state, U.S.A. and Japan to have a idea for removal and management policy. Then, This study propose a establishment of information network system as management policy. To administrate removing and managing records effectively, an idea that records belong to the public should be accepted commonly. The policy for management of the record is followings. Firstly, unification of classification is necessary. The records which were removed from foreign countries had better to be classified according to their origins of states and institutions. Secondly, Finding aids should be prepared for user. There are many accession aids such as catalog, register, inventory for user in archives. This will be a efficient method for management. When a record is removed, a card for description of contents must be composed. Thirdly, a digital input and network system establishment is necessary. It will help to manage a condition of removed records. A digital input and management system establishment is not just a project of digitalizing records. At present, various finding aids need to be introduced to make a database for records and archives. An search using only 'search engine' may make a difficulty in finding materials because such method is apt to have too much or little result. So, classification, arrangement, description, response-service should be integrated in these system. The recent technical advancement give a opportunity to realize this idea. Above all, these procedure should be archival process.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제47호
• /
• pp.51-93
• /
• 2016

한국근현대사의 굴곡 속에서 공공 및 민간기록물이 훼손되고 유실되었다. 2007년 "공공기관의 기록물관리에 관한 법률"이 "공공기록물관리에 관한법률"로 전면 개정되면서, 민간에 소산되어 있는 주요 기록물을 파악 보존하기 위해 '국가지정기록물'을 지정하는 제도가 보강되었다. 중앙기록물관리기관에서 일정한 기준과 범위를 정하여 '국가지정기록물'을 지정하여 소장기관을 후원함으로서 공공기록물의 한계를 보완하고 한국사회의 역사상을 풍부히 하는데 기여할 것이라 기대하고 만든 제도이다. 2007년부터 2015년까지 총 14건의 기록물이 국가지정기록물로 지정되었다. 본고에서는 어떠한 기록물들이 '국가지정기록물'로 지정되었으며, 소장처들은 국가지정기록물을 어떻게 관리하고 활용해왔는지 살펴보고자 한다. 이를 통해 국가지정기록물 지정제도의 관리현황을 파악하고자 한다. 더불어 '국가지정기록물' 소장기관의 담당자를 면담하여 국가지정기록물 소장처의 기록물 관리현황과 서비스 현황 및 국가지정기록물 지정 효과를 살펴보고, 국가지정기록물 지정제도의 개선방안을 제언하고자 한다.