• 농촌계획
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.98-107
• /
• 1998

For efficient development of rural facilities, choice of their optimum locations would be an important issue, however, existing research works concentrated much more an allocation policy of urban industrial complex and public facilities than rural ones. In this study, because agricultural-cum-industrial complex has been the most widely developed representative one of rural facilities, it was selected as a case study facility. As a pre-study to system development, existing governmental location-decision system was checked and interviewing survey carried out to find out on-spot problems. And, being based on literature review and survey analysis results, 4-step optimum locational decision model was developed , formulation of locational goal system, ranking tabulation on components, determination of significance values of components, calculation of component scores. Finally, through the case study works on 3 sites, system applicability was checked, Considering together the simplicity problem of existing guidelines and the interviewing survey results favoring the diversified viewpoints, it would be necessary to develop multifaceted support system for locational decision making. 3-tier classification steps from the higher, middle to lower one were used and their underpinning viewpoints were sorted as on regional development, entrepreneurship, spatial rationality, from which a tentative locational goal system was formulated. Through the expert group checking, final locational goal system was determined having 3 of the higher classification items, 7 of the middle ones, 23 of the lower ogles. For ranking tabulation, 3 types of ranking criteria were arranged which were based on statistical analysis using mean and standard deviation(Type I ), its existence or not 1 good or not(Type E ), and the others(Type E ). From the significance evaluation results, regional development and entrepreneurship aspects were valued much higher than spatial rationality aspect. And, in the middle step, items as spread effects of regional economy, accessibility and social potentialities were highly valued while infrastructural development level and natural condition being low. The application results of the system to 3 case study total. However, the detailed ones differed among study the influencing effects on regional economy, and contrast greater the infrastructural development level. Conclusively, final evaluation values well represented the characteristics of each area. If this system be complemented and applied comprehensively by the successive studies, it would be developed to a general model of locational decision supporting system for rural facilities.

• Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.2907-2915
• /
• 2018

1998년에 창립한 한국자료분석 학회지는 자료분석에 기반한 다양한 전공분야를 위해 현재까지 응용학회지로서 역할을 해오고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 한국자료분석 학회지의 본연의 목적을 잘 수행해오고 있는지 최근 10년간 학회지 요약문을 통해 분석하였다. 분석은 한국연구재단에서 제공한 온라인 저널 홈페이지를 통해 2006년부터 2016년까지의 영문 요약문 2680개를 웹크롤링하여 토픽모델을 적용하였다. 분석결과로 18개의 토픽이 선정되었으며 이에 대한 토픽을 해석한 결과 자료분석학회지는 간호학, 경영학(마케팅), 경제학 등 여러 분야를 다루고 있으며 분석방법으로 회귀분석, 가설검정, 데이터마이닝(연관성분석), 요인분석 등이 많이 이용되고 있음을 볼 수 있었다. 그리고 단어들의 연관성(association rule)분석을 통하여 통계적으로 유의한 연관성 규칙 10개를 제시하였다. 여기서 연관성규칙의 통계적 유의성검정은 피셔의 정확검정(Fisher's exact test)을 사용하였다. 또한 연구주제(토픽)의 변화를 살펴본 결과 전반기에는 조사연구가, 후반기에는 대조 연구가 많아졌음을 볼 수 있고 또한 회귀분석과 요인분석은 전, 후반기 구분 없이 자료분석에서 공통적으로 많이 사용하는 통계적 방법임을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.230-242
• /
• 2000

Background : The measuring instruments for customer satisfaction in hospitals are often composed of some dimensions reflecting the conceptive complexity of them. Then, overall satisfaction would be expected to be equal the 'weighted' sum of scores by dimensions because the importance rated by customers may be different across the dimensions. But the issue of how to weight the dimensions with importance is not yet solved. We examined 3 sets of weighting methods as to make effect on predictive power against overall satisfaction. Methods : We conducted a survey included 483 subjects who had visited or admitted to a university hospital, using the short form questionnaire being developed by The Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care for out-patient and in-patient. By using a multiple linear regression model, we compared among changes of explanatory powers against overall satisfaction as dependent variable after weighting 4 dimensions of the survey questionnaire as independent variables with importance scores of dimensions perceived by consumers. And we compared the feasibility of each weighting, methods by checking missing cases. Results : There were no weighting methods increasing the explanatory power after applying them. The method of absolute scoring was found higher explanatory-power than others, but this finding had no statistical significance. Regarding the number of missing value, method of absolutely scoring had the least cases. Conclusion : Our findings suggested that weighting the dimensions with importance might have little significance in the cases of scales having items highly correlated, such as consumers' satisfaction. Though asking with items to be answered absolutely, customers might be rating relatively in some degree and this method produced least missing cases. Considering these points, in the cases when weighting the dimensions with importance would be required, we suggest that weighting method by absolute scoring might be better than others.