• 인지과학
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 2020

사회성은 인간 삶의 고유 영역이자 종합적인 능력으로서 중요한 가치를 지닌다. 일반 통념상 사회성 부족이 게임 이용의 대표적인 문제점으로 지적되는 가운데, 본 문헌 고찰에서는 비디오 게임 중 온라인 비디오 게임을 대상으로 사회적 역량과의 관계를 살펴본 연구들을 분석했다. 해당 분야에는 현재 온라인 게임 안의 관계가 실제 관계를 대체하거나 보완하여 사회성 발달을 저해할 것이라는 견해와 온라인 비디오 게임이 직접적으로 사회성에 악영향을 미치지 않으며 오히려 사회적 학습의 공간을 제공함으로써 유익한 결과를 낼 수 있다는 주장이 팽팽하게 맞서고 있다. 또한 온라인 게임 이용과 심리특성 및 사회적 역량을 측정한 대규모 설문 조사에서도 게임 이용과 사회성 저하 간의 뚜렷한 관계성이 관찰되지 않았다. 이에 본 문헌 고찰 연구를 통해 온라인 게임 플레이가 사회성 저하를 초래한다는 고정관념에서 벗어날 것과 관련 연구의 타당성을 높이기 위한 노력이 필요함을 제안한다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.38-46
• /
• 2003

Perceived crowding is known as a necessary method to evaluate social carrying capacity in recreational settings. But according to the results of previous research, perceived crowding, use density, and satisfaction have shown weak and indirect correlations. The theory of visitors’ adjustment is one of several possible explanations for this poor relation. But the validity of the visitors’ adjustment theory has not been not inspected clearly. Therefore, the purposes of this study are to understand visitors’ adjustment theory and to examine visitors’ adjustment to the overuse of recreational settings. Study hypotheses were formulated through literature review and related to visitors’ adjustment in recreation density. Pour hypotheses were established and inspected with the case study, i.e., Rationalization : Visitors’ satisfaction isn't related to use density in recreation setting, 2) Product-shift : Preference norm is related to current use density, 3) Self-selection : Visitors’ satisfaction for the use level is generally high, and 4) Displacement : Norm interference is related to willingness to revisit. The case study was conducted during May and June,2001. According to the results of this survey, visitors adjust to overuse of recreation setting through rationalization and product shift (hypotheses l/2 acceptance). Current use density isn't related to visitors’ satisfaction and willingness to revisit (see table 3). And visitors’ preference norm is modified by situation (see table 4). Visitors’ satisfaction and willingness to revisit don't show a high correlation but moderately high (see table 5, hypothesis 3 acceptance). Differences between visitors’ preference norm and current use density is norm interference. Norm interference isn't related to willingness to revisit (see table 7). Therefore, the norm interference concept is not a useful method to explain visitors’ adjustment to the degree of overuse in a recreational setting (hypothesis 4 rejection). As for future directions, the following are proposed: 1) correctly understanding and reestablishing the visitor norm and norm interference concept, 2) introducing a composite research method to monitor visitors’ behavior and survey visitors’ attitudes and coping responses. These efforts would be helpful in the Planning and management of recreational settings to improve the quality of visitors’ experiences.