• 제목/요약/키워드: slip layer

검색결과 132건 처리시간 0.021초

유리섬유복합체를 사용한 전단연결재 형상에 따른 중단열 벽체의 면내전단내력 (Effect of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Shear Connector's Shape on Inplane Shear Strength of Insulated Concrete Sandwich Panels)

  • 장석준;유영찬;김호룡;윤현도
    • 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집
    • /
    • 제17권4호
    • /
    • pp.9-17
    • /
    • 2013
  • 최근, 중단열 벽체의 단열성능 향상을 위해 철과 콘크리트 코어 전단연결재를 열전도율이 낮은 유리섬유복합체 (GFRP)로 전단연결재를 대체하는 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 연구는 단열재의 표면처리에 따른 부착력과, GFRP 전단연결재로 보강된 중단열 벽체의 전단내력을 알아보기 위하여 실시되었으며, 각 변수에 따른 영향을 분석함으로써 구조성능에 대한 검증을 실시하였다. 총 13개의 실험체에 대해 직접전단실험을 실시하였으며, 파괴양상 및 하중-상대슬립 관계에 대한 분석을 실시하였다. 실험결과, 기존의 압출법 보온판 (XPS) 단열재에 거친표면처리와 10 mm의 홈을 낸 경우 단열재와 콘크리트사이에 부착력을 향상시킬 수 있으며, 부착력의 기여는 전단연결재의 파단 상대슬립의 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 파형 전단연결재의 폭이 커짐에 따라 강성이 증가하였으며, 보강단면적이 증가함에 따라 최대내력이 증가하였다. 효과적인 보강을 위해서는 파형 전단연결재의 높이와 피치의 비율을 1:2로 산정해야 할 것으로 판단되며, 안정적인 파괴를 위해서는 매립깊이에 대한 검증이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

교육시설 안전 등급 인증과 학교 안전도 심사에 대한 연구 (A Study on Indoor Environment Safety Level Certification of Educational Facilities and School Safety Level Evaluation)

  • 김명관;권영국
    • 대한안전경영과학회지
    • /
    • 제25권2호
    • /
    • pp.17-28
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation items and weight determination of the indoor environmental safety area, which has the most frequent accidents, among the safety certification evaluations of educational facilities by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, which has been conducted since May 2021. As a preceding study, the evaluation items of the school safety evaluation checklist being implemented in the US state of Vermont were compared, and the causes of accidents judged by teachers in the accident experiences written by 200 Korean teachers were compared with the safety certification evaluation items belonged to the Ministry of Education. In addition, research literature using the AHP analysis technique on safety risks of elementary and secondary schools in China and safety evaluation index study cases of 539 elementary school children in Indonesia were analyzed. Through these preceding studies, measures to add and adjust evaluation items were derived and the validity and importance rankings of evaluation items were calculated through AHP questionnaires to teachers and safety experts. In addition, a survey was conducted on 104 ordinary people to verify the results of expert analysis. As a result of expert AHP analysis, 'safety education and disaster response training (.396)' was the highest priority for the relative importance of the first layer, followed by 'safety measures (.387)' and 'building materials'. Safety (.216)' was found to be the highest priority. In the overall importance ranking of the 13 second-tier screening items, safety accident prevention education had the highest priority and disaster preparedness training ranked second, proving that the Ministry of Education's review weight was underestimated. In addition, slip and collision accident countermeasures, which were not in the existing Ministry of Education review items, ranked 4th, laboratory practice room safety measures ranked 6th, and sanitation, cleanliness, hazardous substance management, and cafeteria/cooking room safety measures ranked 9th, indicating a significant level of importance. Referring to the importance ranking, which is the result of this study, it is suggested that it is necessary to review the weight of each review item again.