• Biomolecules & Therapeutics
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.303-308
• /
• 2002

A bioequivalence study of Shin II Cefadroxil capsule (Shin II Pharm. Co. Ltd.) to Duricef capsule(Bo Ryung Pharm. Co. Ltd.), each containing 500 mg of cefadroxil, was conducted. Twenty three healthy Korean male subjects administered each formulation at the dose of 1 capsule (500 mg as cefadroxil) in 2 $\times$ 2 cross-over study. There was a I-week washout period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of cefadroxil were monitored for a period of 8 hr after each administration by an LC/UV method. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to 8 hr ($AUC_t$) was calculated by a linear trapezoidal method. $C_{max}$ was compiled from the plasma drug concentration-time data. ANOVA test was conducted for logarithmically transformed $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$ The results showed that there are no significant differences in $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$ between the two formulations: The differences between d1e formulations in these log transformed parameters were all for less than 20% (i.e., －0.57%, 3.84% for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were within the acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (i.e., log 0.94~log 1.04 and log 0.95~log 1.10 for $AUC_t$ and $C_{max}$, respectively). Based on d1e bioequivalence criteria of KFDA guidelines, the two formulations of cefadroxil were concluded to be bioequivalent.