• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.105-121
• /
• 1984

The bioavailability of rifampicin (brand A, B and C) was studied and the dissolution by foamed plastic rotating method and basket rotating method was also investigated. The results were as follows; 1. In the case of foamed plastic rotating method, it was revealed that dissolution rate of brand C was most rapid, but in the case of basket rotating method the results revealed that brand B was most rapid. Also it was observed that the dissolution rate in artificial gastric juice was more rapid than one in artificial intestinal juice, and that Avicel added in capsule increased additively the dissolution rate, particulary brand B. 2. Relative systemic availability by urine data showed that the results from all capsules filled with brand A, B and C were identical but in the case of the ripamficin capsules filled with Avicel, the results showed that Avicel increased the availability of brand A and B. 3. Area under serum concentration curve $(0{\sim}8hrs)$ was in order of $brand\;A{\fallingdotseq}brand\;C$ > brand B, but Avicel increased significantly the AUC of brand B and showed no effect in others. 4. Relative systemic availability calculated with excreted amount of rifampicin in urine was similar in each rifampicin capsules. In rifampicin (A) and rifampicin (B), Avicel which added in capsules appeared increasing tendency in urine excretion of rifampicin, but in rifampicin (C) it did not appeared. 5. Area under serum concentration curve $(0{\sim}8hrs)$ in rifampicin capsules was in order of $rifampicin(A){\fallingdotseq}rifampicin(C)$>rifampicin(B). In rifampicin (B) with Avicel capsules, area under serum concentration curve (0-8hrs.) increased significantly and in others insignificantly.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 1989

The study was performed to compare the dissolution, diffusion and absorption characteristics using Sartorius dissolution and absorption simulator and in vivo bioavailability of commercially available rifampicin capsules. Both brands C and F showed similar dissolution patterns and absorption properties through artificial gastric barrier in Sartorius simulator. Diffusion rate constants through the membrane of brands C and F were $3.04\;{\times}40^{-3}$ and $2.88\;{\times}\;10^{-3}cm/min$, respectively. Rifampicin capsules were administered orally to six fasted healthy volunteers according to cross-over design. The pharmacokinetic parameters between brands C and F, maximum plasma drug concentration$(C_{max})$, the time to reach $C_{max}$, absorption rate constant and area under the curve $(AUC_{0-24hr})$, elimination rate constant, and amount of drug excreted in urine were 6.11 and $7.27\;{\mu}g/ml$, 2.71 and 1.52 hr, 0.6371 and $1.6456 hr^{-1}$, 57.84 and $57.28\;{\mu}g\;{\cdot}\;hr/ml$, 0.1891 and $0.1734 hr^{-l}$, 119.98 and 119.93 mg, respectively. On the basis of experimental results, it was concluded that the bioavailability of brand C rifampicin capsules was almost the same as that of brand F rifampicin capsules.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 1994

Bioequivalence test of commercially available rifampicin capsules was performed. Sixteen volunteers were divided into 2 groups and the reference and test drug were given orally (450 mg) by cross-over design. Statistical evaluation of AUC, $C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ involved an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The differences of mean value in AUC, $C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ between the reference and test drug were within 20% with reference drug. ANOVA showed no significant differences for ‘between group’, ‘drug’ and ‘period’, but not for ‘between subjects’. The power of test $(1-{\beta})\;of\;AUC\;and\;$C_{max}$ was larger than 0.8 and the confidence of bioavailability was $within\;{\pm}20%$. From these results, it was concluded that the two preparations were bioequivalent for AUC and $C_{max}$, but was not for $T_{max}$.