• Title/Summary/Keyword: rebar location

Search Result 22, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

A Case Study on Cause Analysis for Longitudinal Crack of Duct Slab in Tunnel (터널 덕트슬래브의 종방향 균열에 대한 원인 분석 사례 연구)

  • Park, Sung Woo;Park, Seung Su;Hwang, In Baek;Cha, Chul Joon
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.16 no.5
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2012
  • In this study, cause of longitudinal crack which is found on duct slab of road tunnel is studied. In-depth investigation, such as visual inspection, non-destructive testing and geometrical surveying of duct slab, is carried out. In order to perform cause analysis, the investigated results are compared to the results of numerical analysis. Many factors, which cause longitudinal crack, are classified as constrained condition of the duct slab, location of the rebar, temperature, shrinkage and so on. According to the classified causes of longitudinal crack, numerical analysis is performed considering construction stage of the tunnel lining. Especially, in order to predict shrinkage stain due to discrepancy of curing date, ACI-209 model, KCI structural design code and other researcher's shrinkage test results are compared. The results show that shrinkage strain is one of the main factors causing longitudinal crack. Other investigated tunnels are classified along with the construction method of duct slab and patterns of cracks. As a result, improving ways to construct duct slab are suggested.

Evaluation of Structural Performance of RC Beam with Different Depths to Lap Splice Detail of SD700 Headed Bar (SD700 확대머리 철근의 겹침이음 상세를 적용한 단차가 있는 RC 보의 구조성능 평가)

  • Lee, Ji-Hyeong;Kim, Seung-Hun
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.25 no.6
    • /
    • pp.262-269
    • /
    • 2021
  • This paper conducts an evaluation of the structural performance of the lap splice detail of SD700 headed bar experiment for developing an RC beam with different depths joint details. The experiment variable is lap splice length, yield strength, and end anchorage of main reinforcements. For all specimens, a headed bar was applied to the main reinforcement of the beam with low depth (B2), and the beam with high depth (B1) was applied to the main reinforcement with two splice methods: straight headed bar and 90° hooked-headed bar. The experimental results were that specimens of applying SD500 and SD600 had the results of flexural fracture at the lap splice location, which maximum load was similar. For specimens of appling SD500, the 90° hooked-headed bar of B1, suppressed horizontal cracks in the lap splice section compared to the straight headed bar. Specimens of applying an SD 700 headed bar had the results of brittle anchorage failure. In addition, maximum load was increased with the lap splice length increasing. For specimens of applying SD700 headed bar, test for test maximum load/theoretical load for test development length/design development length were estimated to be 1.30~1.48 for the ACI 318-19 equation, and 1.14~1.30 for the KDS-2021 equation. Thus, ACI 318-19 equation had conservatively greater safety factors as estimated development lengththened.