• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2012

Over the world, social demands and concerns of energy and resource depletions and environmental conservation have resulted in many researches and applications on sustainable development and construction. In order to support these demands and concerns, international green building certification systems such as LEED(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) were developed. In Korea, the green building certification system was introduced in 2000 and widely applied to all types of new buildings in order to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings on May, 2010. This paper investigates the importance of assessment criteria on multi-unit apartment projects among certification rating systems using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and suggests a new direction on certification assessment standards. For applying the AHP method, the survey of staffs in green building certification consulting companies and architectural design companies was conducted via e-mail. As a result, criteria like energy, indoor environment, land use, pollution control, and ecological environment among 9 main ones turned out important on assessing green building certification at multi-unit apartment projects, while criteria like water resource, transportation, maintenance management, and material and resource did relatively unimportant.

• 부모자녀건강학회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.90-100
• /
• 2002

Web sites on the internet are excellent information resources for the consumers to gain health care knowledge. Especially web sites related to child-care more increase recently. But a concern has emerged for the quality of contents contained on the child-care web sites. Lack of evaluation criteria have led to inaccurate and misleading child-care related publications on the Internet. For evaluating the quality and reliability of child-care related information on the Web, rating tool should be provided and developed. So, this article reviewed and investigated the elements to evaluate child-care sites on the internet. On the basis of the review of articles and the validity test about the contents, 16 preliminary items including purpose, contents, authority, feedback, design developed. Through the pilot study that apply the preliminary evaluating criteria to 20 evaluating criteria for child-care web sites developed. This evaluating criteria have 24 items and that were categorized to purpose(2 items), detail of contents(16 items), authority(2 items), feedback(2 items), design(4 items). The result of this study suggest that the evaluation criteria for child-care web sites may be useful for evaluating the quality of child-care web sites.

• 한국어교육
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.173-196
• /
• 2017

Writing is a subjective and performative activity. Writing ability has multi-facets and compoundness. To understand the examinees's writing ability accurately and provide effective writing scores, raters first ought to have the competency regarding assessment. Therefore, this study is significant as a fundamental research about rater's characteristics on the TOPIK writing assessment. 150 scripts of the 47th TOPIK examinees were selected randomly, and were further rated independently by 20 raters. The many-facet Rasch model was used to generate individualized feedback reports on each rater's relative severity and consistency with respect to particular categories of the rating scale. This study was analyzed using the FACETS ver 3.71.4 program. Overfit and misfit raters showed many difficulties for noticing the difference between assessment factors and interpreting the criteria. Writing raters appear to have much confusion when interpreting the assessment criteria, and especially, overfit and misfit teachers interpret the criteria arbitrarily. The main reason of overfit and misfit is the confusion about assessment factors and criteria in finding basis for scoring. Therefore, there needs to be more training and research is needed for raters based on this type of writing assessment characteristics. This study is recognized significantly in that it collectively examined writing assessment characteristics of writing raters, and visually confirmed the assessment error aspects of writing assessment.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제63권5호
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 2021

The physical condition assessment criteria of fill dam safety inspection are now weakly regulated and inappropriate for small agricultural reservoirs since these criteria have fundamental backgrounds suitable for large-scale dams. This study proposes the degree (critical values) of defects for the quantitative condition assessment of the embankment in order to prepare the condition assessment criteria for a small reservoir with a storage capacity of less than one (1) million cubic meters. The critical values of defects were calculated by applying the method that considers the size ratios based on the dimensional data of reservoirs, and the method of statistical analysis on the measured values of the defect degree which extracted from comprehensive annual reports on reservoir safety inspection. In comparison with the current criteria, the newly proposed critical values for each condition assessment item of the reservoir embankment are presented in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the conclusion. In addition, this study presents a method of displaying geometric figures to clarify the rating classification for condition assessment items with the two defect indicators.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.195-199
• /
• 2011

영어 능력평가를 위한 테스트는 평가자, 과제, 인터뷰의 주제, 그리고 평가 받는 사람의 성별 등 여러 가지 이유 때문에 그 평가 결과가 아주 다양할 수 있다. 이전의 자료는 평가자가 외국어로서의 영어구술 능력 평가 결과에 아주 중요한 영향을 끼친다는 것을 증명해 왔다. 이렇게 영어 능력 구술 평가에 영향을 미치는 평가자에 대한 많은 조사는 있었지만 평가 과정에 잠재적으로 영향을 줄 수 있는 평가자의 가변성에 대한 조사는 극히 드물었다. 시험 환경이 달라지면 그에 따라 구술 평가가 달라지고 그 평가 기준은 또 완전히 달라진다. 그러므로 다양한 시험 수행 과제에 대해 똑같은 평가 기준을 적용하는 것은 적당치 않다. 즉 평가 과정에 대한 더 많은 원안 분석과 심도 있는 연구가 필요하다. 제 2외국어로서 영어 능력평가를 위한 구술시험은 보다 더 현실적이고 효율적인 장치가 만들어져야 할 것이다.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.204-214
• /
• 1999

연구배경: 만성폐질환자가 일상생활에서 느끼는 호흡곤란정도, 안정상태에서 시행된 폐기능검사 및 심폐운동검사사이에 어떤 관계가 있는지, 안정시 폐기능검사와 심폐운동검사가 호흡곤란의 정도를 잘 반영하는지 등을 연구하고자 만성폐질환자에서 기초호흡곤란지수, 안정시 폐기능검사 및 심폐운동능력을 조사하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 연구방법: 최근 2개월내에 악화되지 않은 만성폐질환자 50명을, 기존의 안정시 폐기능검사 및 증상 제한적 심폐운동검사결과를 이용하는 폐기능손상/장애 평가기준과 baseline dyspnea index의 초점점수에 따라 저자들이 임의로 정한 기준으로 비중증군과 중증군으로 분류후 각 군간의 안정시 폐기능검사, 심폐운동검사, 초점점수를 비교하였으며, 각 기준의 상호 민감도 및 특이도를 비교하였다. 연구결과: 안정시 폐기능검사치상 중증군에서 max WR(%), $VO_2$max, $VO_2$max(%) 및 초점 점수가 유의하게 낮았고(p<0.01), $VO_2$max으로 구분하였을 때는 중증군에서 안정시 폐기능검사치 중 $FEV_1$(%)만 유의하게 낮았다(p<0.05). Max WR, max WR(%) 및 초점 접수는 중증군에서 유의하게 낮았다(p<0.01) $VO_2$max(%)이 60% 미만인 경우를 중증군으로 하였을 때 $FEV_1$, $FEV_1$(%), MVV(%), max WR와 max WR(%), 초점 점수 등이 중증군에서 유의하게 낮았다(p<0.05). 초점 점수의 중위수 혹은 5점보다 낮은 경우를 중증군으로 분류하였을 때, 중증군에서 안정시 폐기능치들은 비중증군과 차이가 없었으나(p>0.05), max WR와 max WR(%), $VO_2$max와 $VO_2$max(%)는 유의하게 낮았다(p<0.01). 초점점수와 $VO_2$max의 상관계수는 0.51(p<0.01), $VO_2$max(%)은 0.52(p<0.01)이었으며, 안정시 폐기능 검사치 중 $FEV_1$(%)은 0.41(p<0.01)였다. 초점 점수의 $VO_2$max에 대한 결정계수는 0.26(p=0.0002)였고, $VO_2$max(%)에 대한 결정계수는 0.06(p=0.0001)였다. $FEV_1$은 각각 0.08(p=0.01), 0.38(p=0.0189)였다. 안정시 폐기능검사치 $VO_2$max, $VO_2$max(%)를 기준으로 중증 폐기능손상을 구분하였을 때 선택기준에 따라 민감도와 특이도가 차이가 있었고, 초점 점수의 중위수 및 5점을 기준으로 중증 폐기능 손상을 분류했을 때의 민감도 및 특이도와 큰 차이가 없었다. 결 론: 이상과 같은 결과로 안정시 폐기능검사만으로는 $VO_2$max를 정확하게 예측하기 힘들며, 특별한 금기사항이 없는 한 안정시 폐기능검사상 정상 혹은 경미한 손상을 보이는 환자뿐만 아니라 중증손상을 보이는 환자에서도 심폐운동검사를 시행하여 폐기능 손상 평가의 정확도를 높이는 것이 좋을 것으로 여겨지며, 폐기능 손상평가의 기존 기준들에 호흡곤란정도를 반영할 수 있을 것으로 여겨진다.

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2001

Currently, obtaining information about the housing studies through the internet web sites is one of the outstanding mediums. Those are of the housings, architecture, interior design, furniture products, hotels and its journals, etc., and out of all those informations are the highly expected value of use. But. it may causes the public users to experience a negative effect, because many of those informations provided on the internet web sites related to the housing studies/informations are not providing an equal quality of information. And measuring the quality is also not easy. This study focuses on the establishment of evaluation criterion for the housing information-related internet web sites. In such a vein, it proposes a clear model to evaluate the information qualities with the 43 questionnaires / examining items. To test the questionnaires/rating items, the analysis has been implemented which has shown the reciprocal effect between the 2 major factors. One major factor with 4 variables on the information searches are (1) the accuracy/reliability of contents and techniques, (2) the design of a picture and communication, (3) the readability and security, and (4) the security of private information, and the other factor with 3variables on the additional services are (1) the diversities of contents and ease of orderings, (2) the abilities of search and e-mail, and (3) the events and after services. This study/rating model will provide the users with a fundamental material in evaluating the quality of housing information on the internet web sites.

• 한국소음진동공학회논문집
• /
• 제16권10호
• /
• pp.1005-1013
• /
• 2006

A survey and auditory experiment on multiple residential noises such as floor impact, airborne, bathroom, drainage and traffic noises were conducted to develop a combined rating system and to establish criteria for multiple residential noises. Subjective reactions such as annoyance, activity disturbance, sleep disturbance, and satisfaction to overall noise environment and each residential noise were recorded. The effect of individual noise perception on the evaluation of the overall noise environment was also investigated. The survey results showed that satisfaction for floor impact noise most greatly affects the overall satisfaction for overall noise environment and annoyance most greatly affects the satisfaction for individual noise sources. Auditory experiments were undertaken to determine the percent satisfaction for individual noise levels. Result of auditory experiment showed that the noise level corresponding to 40 % satisfaction is 49 dB $(L_{i,Fmax,AW})$ for floor impact and is about 40 dB(A) for airborne, drainage and traffic noise. From the results of the survey and the auditory experiments, an equation for predicting the overall satisfaction for multiple noises was developed and a classification of multiple residential noises was proposed.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.260-269
• /
• 2022

Background: Comprehensive medication management is essential to achieve safe and optimal drug use for the elderly in long-term care facilities (LTCF). This study aimed to develop eligibility criteria for "Comprehensive medication management program in LTCF" using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM). Furthermore, we attempted to estimate the number of beneficiaries who met the criteria by analyzing the National Health Insurance claims data. Methods: Twelve criteria were selected initially. We composed a panel of 14 experts with expertise in long-term care. We conducted two survey rounds to reach a consensus. Rating for appropriateness and decision regarding agreement were applied per RAM. We analyzed the National Health Insurance data to estimate the number of LTCF residents who met each eligibility criterion. Results: Of the 11 items agreed upon, ten items were determined to be appropriate. In 2018, 83.6% of 165,994 residents of LTCF met one or more eligibility criteria. The largest number of subjects met the "New residents of LTCF" criterion, followed by "Take high-alert drugs" and "Chronic excessive polypharmacy." Since the items evaluated as most appropriate by the expert panel and those with a large number of subjects were similar, we confirmed the external validity of our criteria. Conclusion: It is worth noting that this is the first attempt to establish the eligibility criteria for medication management in LTCF. Further preliminary research is needed to identify the selected subjects' drug-related problems and revise the criteria according to the results.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.279-290
• /
• 2006

This paper proposes a model to assess the maturity level of Six Sigma activities. We classify the maturity level into 5 stages: initial, forming, storming, performing and mature stage. To evaluate the maturity level, 10 categories of Six Sigma with 3 factors each are identified: management leadership, belt system, expert training, establishing execution system, compensation, organization, corporate culture, customer focus, project selection, and management of project results. Scoring 277 items in total, the value of each factor is evaluated by weighted average of those items. Maturity level is appraised by rating the sum of scores of 10 categories that are obtained by summing up the values of its 3 factors. Values of weights and criteria of rating maturity levels are determined by analyzing 90 companies and Six Sigma exper's opinion. This study also shows the actual appraisal results of some companies.