• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제34권6호
• /
• pp.1807-1814
• /
• 2014

자연재해는 발생 자체를 막는데 한계가 있기 때문에 피해저감을 위해서는 예방사업을 통해 재해발생을 사전에 예방하는 것이 중요하다. 자연재해발생의 증가와 함께 자연재해와 관련된 예방사업에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있으며, 이와 관련된 투자도 증가하고 있다. 이와 함께 자연재해예방사업에 대한 투자 시, 그 파급효과 등을 검증할 수 있는 평가 역시 중요한 과제로 대두되고 있다. 자연재해예방사업과 같은 국가 공공투자사업을 평가하기 위해서 비용편익분석과 같은 정량적 분석을 통한 연구는 지속적으로 수행되고 있다. 정량적 분석방법만으로 사업의 효과를 충분히 설명하지 못한다는 문제점에도 불구하고 재해관련 분야에서 효과분석이나 평가를 위한 다양한 방법이 제시되지 못하고 있는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 정성적 분석을 통한 자연재해예방사업의 사후평가를 위해서 자연재해예방사업의 사후평가에 영향을 미치는 항목들을 도출하고, 구조방정식모델(SEM : structural equation modeling)을 통해 사후 평가항목과 사업효과 간 인과관계 분석 및 가중치를 산정하였다. 이를 바탕으로 자연재해예방 사업에 대한 사후평가지수 산정식을 제시하였다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop evaluation criteria for conversations about medication and to demonstrate conversational analysis with actual dialogues on medication as examples. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of qualitative research using conversational analysis which showed functional phases and patterns of dialogue about medication (greeting, identifying the patient, medicating, finishing). Nurse-patient conversations were videotaped and transcribed and 75 conversations were used for analysis. Results: Not all functional phases were showed in the conversations about medication. Therefore, conversations about medication can be considered as incomplete dialogues. The evaluation-criteria were represented in terms of the structure and content of the dialogues. Structural evaluation-criteria were the same as the functional phases, as functional stage is the standard for evaluation. The criteria of evaluation for content suggested 3 domains, content, expression, and interaction with 20 items scored on a Likert-type scale of 5-points. Finally, analysis of actual conversations about medication according to the evaluative criteria were provided. Conclusion: The results provide the basic data to develop educational programs and strategies to improve nurses’ competency in conversation about medication.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.473-478
• /
• 2008

Since the late 1990, "Smart clothing" has been developed in a various way to meet user centered design and human engineering that considered usability, wearability with clothing. Under this circumstance, research and development of smart clothing has been demanded usability and wearability test. But, Study of the usability evaluation for sensor based smart clothing is insufficient. In this study, we suggest criterion of usability evaluation for sensor based smart clothing that evaluate on the point of view such as wearability of clothing, interaction of clothing and devices, interaction of body and devices. we performed qualitative and quantitative test with developed smart clothing to present usability evaluation criterion for sensor based smart clothing. As a result, total 7 categories such as 'usefulness', 'wearability', 'appearance', 'riskness', 'facility of management', 'perceived change', were extracted as the usability and wearability criterion. Additionally, 28 factors of evaluation criterion for sensor based smart clothing were indicated on the result of this research. This study have meaning to indicate usability evaluation criterion for sensor based smart clothing.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.199-210
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 우리나라 문헌정보학 논문들에 대한 평가내용들을 제시하고 과학적 연구와 질적 연구, 비실증적 연구 등에 관하여 논의하였다. 현재의 논문생산시스템을 제도적으로 보완하기 위해서는 개관적 연구분야의 활성화가 필요하다. 향후 이 분야의 활성화를 위하여 학회차원이나 학술진흥재단 차원에서 노력할 수 있을 것이다. 예컨대 Annual Review of Information Science and Technology와 유사한 학술지를 연간으로 발행할 수도 있고 기존학회지에 개관논문들을 게재하도록 장려할 수 있을 것이다. 각 분야의 권위자들이 한국의 도서관계에 도움을 줄 수 있는 연구내용을 정리하고 향후의 연구방향을 제시하면 그 파급효과는 상당히 클 것으로 예상된다.

• 한국기계기술학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.9-19
• /
• 2011

Most real world design evaluation and risk-based decision support combine quantitative and qualitative (linguistic) variables. Decision making based on conventional mathematics that combines qualitative and quantitative concepts always exhibit difficulty in modelling actual problems. The successful selection process for choosing a design/procurement proposal is based on a high degree of technical integrity, safety levels and low costs in construction, corrective measures, maintenance, operation, inspection and preventive measures. In this paper, a design decision support framework using a composite structure methodology grounded in approximate reasoning approach and evidential reasoning method is suggested for design evaluation of machinery space of a ship engine room at the initial stages. An illustrative example is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework.

• 대한인간공학회지
• /
• 제30권6호
• /
• pp.765-773
• /
• 2011

Objective: This study aims towards exploring a model of the HCI evaluation methods to improve the usability of mobile device, based on a case of a Mobile PDA system in a Museum context. Background: Mobile PDA systems in a Museum context is widely utilized for the educational purposes, but it is criticized for low usability that the device only play a role in textbooks on legs without any interactive educational activities. Therefore, the usability improvements on the mobile PDA system should be considered. Method 1: This model was developed with a combination of the expert review and the user testing, and with a combination of the qualitative and quantitative studies. In more details, first of all, a qualitative study was conducted as a combination of three different methods: 1) expert review with heuristics, 2) interviews with persons working in a museum, and 3) contextual enquiry. Results 1: The experts review provided with critical usability issues, and the semi-constructive interview helped to understand the background of the mobile device. Lastly, the contextual enquiry showed user experience problems and directions of improving the device from user's perspective. Method 2: Based on the results of the qualitative study, a questionnaire was designed. Results 2: The analysis of the quantitative study was conducted to generalize the problems, and prioritize the direction of improving the device within the limitation of the cost and time in a museum. Conclusion: This study has implications in developing an example of a HCI evaluation model to improve the user experience of the mobile device as well as finding problems and directions of how to improve the mobile PDA systems in the museum. Application: In fact, most of the studies related to the evaluation of the mobile device have been conducted in a laboratory context due to the cost and time. This paper, however, attempted to apply to various HCI research techniques from different constituents in real context.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.623-631
• /
• 2020

코로나 19라는 전세계적 위기를 맞이하여 이러닝은 '뉴노멀(new normal)'이라는 이름으로 새로운 표준과 일상이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 기존의 일방향적, 교수자 중심적 독백형 이러닝 콘텐츠 분석 평가하였다. 총 20명의 성인 학습자가 참여하였고, 1:1 인터뷰를 통한 사용자 경험 평가를 진행하였고, 질적 데이터 분석을 실시하였다. 사용자 경험 평가 결과, 대화형 이러닝은 다양한 의견에 공감할 수 있고 새로운 이러닝 형태로 신선하였다고 응답하였다. 독백형과 대화형 이러닝 콘텐츠에 관한 개인적 선호에 관해 55%의 학습자가 대화형을 선호한다고 답하였고, 실제 경험을 공유하며 참신하다고 답하였다. 한편, 내용 이해 효과성측면에서 선호도는 60% 학습자가 독백형을 선택하였고, 충분한 개념 설명과 정확한 지식 전달을 지적하였다. 연구 결과를 토대로 대화형 이러닝 콘텐츠 설계와 개발을 위한 개선 방안을 제안하였다.

• 대한한방소아과학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.74-88
• /
• 2019

Objectives The aim of this study is systematic evaluation of the quality of qualitative studies related to short stature. It will be utilized as fundamental data for future qualitative research about Korean Medicine Pediatrics treatment for short stature. Methods We searched qualitative studies related to short stature in the Pubmed. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the qualitative researches by using Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) and Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). We also qualitatively synthesized theme of each included studies. We presented integrated theme and categories with in vivo coding about qualitative research about short stature. Results A total of 47 papers were screened and 7 papers were finally selected. In the quality assessment using COREQ, detalied information about the researchers, methods of approach, reasons for non-participation, presence of non-participants, participant's review of the transcript, and participant's review of the findings were insufficient. In the quality evaluation using CASP, there were lack of justifications for the research methods, description method of research, and bias in process of data analysis. The findings were synthesized into three themes: fixed idea about height, discomfort caused by small stature and personal coping strategy with stress caused by short stature. Conclusions In further qualitative research, it is necessary to report the research according to COREQ and CASP checklist. It is also necessary to understand the stress and coping strategies to short stature of patients, We need to develop a social management strategy for short stature.

• 한국해양공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국해양공학회 2006년 창립20주년기념 정기학술대회 및 국제워크샵
• /
• pp.277-280
• /
• 2006

Most real world design evaluation and risk-based decision support combine quantitative and qualitative (linguistic) variables. Decision-making based on conventional mathematics that combines qualitative and quantitative concepts always exhibit difficulty in modelling actual problems. The successful selection process for choosing a design/procurement proposal is based on a high degree of technical integrity, safety levels and low costs in construction, corrective measures, maintenance, operation, inspection and preventive measures. However, the objectives of maximising the degree of technical performance, maximising the safety levels and minimising the costs incurred are usually in conflict, and the evaluation of the technical performance, safety and costs is always associated with uncertainties, especially for a novel system at the initial concept design stage. In this paper, a design-decision support framework using a composite structure methodology grounded in approximate reasoning approach and evidential reasoning method is suggested for design evaluation of machinery space of a ship engine room at the initial stages. It is a Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) or Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework, which provides a juxtaposition of cost, safety and technical performance of a system during evaluation to assist decision makers in selecting the winning design/procurement proposal that best satisfies the requirement in hand. An illustrative example is used to demonstrate the application of the proposed framework.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.143-151
• /
• 2005

Information technology(IT) investment evaluation requires measurements from many perspectives. Except for the case of financial performance, these measurements mostly belong to the qualitative or intangible domain. The problem with IT investment evaluation lies in the fact that it is very difficult to define the qualitative properties against which to measure the performances. This paper addresses the issue of developing the set of performance indices, and defining the structural relationships between them, such that the IT investment evaluation can be done in a systematic, objective and comprehensive manner. We introduce the balanced scorecard strategy map as the backbone reference frame for the generation of performance indices and for the description of the relationships between them. Sample indices for evaluating projects from strategic perspectives are provided with a case example. A step by step follow through of the index generation process has been presented along with the case.