• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제31권
• /
• pp.177-196
• /
• 2013

This paper is the study of literary modernism school(新感覺派 xinganjuepai), appeared in the early 20th century in China and Japan. This literary modernism, developed in Japan in the 1920s, was developed in China after 10 years in the 1930s. Chinese literary modernism was influenced by the Japanese school. However, the following occurs the difference in modernism caused by background of the two countries. Japanese school of literary modernism was formed by a backlash against the proletarian literature. The rivalry between Japanese proletarian literature and literary modernism occurred in 1920's. Literary modernism in China occurred in the course of the development of the proletarian literature, as part. In addition, China's literary writers of modernism have expressed their support proletarian literature for the position. This difference between the two countries can be caused by the difference of historical background (imperial and colonial) in early 20th century.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제19권
• /
• pp.127-147
• /
• 2010

Lee Chan's early poems were defined as the world of romance. His second-term poems were defined as proletarian poetry and poems written in prison when he made the romance as the core point through longing and desire for lost world. Maximizing the romance was proletarian poetry. His third-term poems were feelings of the northern countries called the spirit of Lee Chan's poems. He recognized the emotion of diaspora as the tragedy in these poems. It was remarkable time that the poet's tragedy observing and expressing the reality of colony. Afterward he wrote poems related inside withdrawal and war cooperation, finally he wrote poem after defecting to North Korea. Lee Chan showed the romance of desire in early poems and proletarian poems. Then he indicated acute scenery of the tragedy in the late 1930s' poems. In heavy situation, he moved from pro-Japanese literature to North Korean literature. However he didn't throw introspected self-reflection language to himself each his changing. But through several form of garden, he clearly showed consistent of maximizing his utopia sense. The time Lee Chan experienced was an icon which intensively indicated several features of deformed modern Korean poetic history. He was a unique poet who expressed various traces of modern Korean poetry in short time step by step. His path informed that he was a special poet who stepped the trace of many modern Korean poetry's extremes such as romantic poetry, proletarian poetry, prison poetry, pro-Japanese poetry and North Korean poetry. Likewise we can call his life as a grudge return. Because he left hometown, experienced the light and darkness of modern times and returned his hometown.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제25권
• /
• pp.87-106
• /
• 2011

This article studies that Korean literature has been renewed to World literature-oriented in the history of Modern Korean literary criticism from early modern period to present for reflecting the slogan, "globalization of Korean Literature" as well as contextualizing the necessity, "new relationship between Korean literature and World literature". Some writers, such as Lee Gwangsoo a pioneer of Modern Korean literature and the group for foreign literature[haioei-munhak-pa] introducing World literature to Korea and Lim hwa a prominent critic of proletarian literary theory under Japanese Colonial period, have understood European literature as World literature Korean literature had to reach. Inevitably the hierarchical relation between Korean literature and European literature as World literature had been interiorized to them. Meanwhile Jo Dong-il and Paik Nak-chung who have been representative researchers of Korean literature had tried to broken down the hierarchical relation between Korean literature and European literature interiorized to Korean writers until the 1980s, with Korean literature could be accomplished to World literature meaning. Since the late 1990s Park Sung-chang and Park Sang-jin who are leading researchers of comparative literature in Korea these days, have emphasized the methodology of new comparative literature for 'universality of literature' between Korean literature and World literature, which have been the renewal way of Korean literature in today's age of globalization.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제35권12호
• /
• pp.1409-1417
• /
• 2011

This study examines King Louis XVI costumes and his portraits according to symbolic meanings. This study analysis of costumes comes from portraits related various domestic and overseas literature, preliminary study papers, and web sites. Omnipotence, activity, nobility, openness and benevolence were distinguished in the symbolic meaning expressed in the portraits of King Louis XVI. Louis XVI in a portrait was drawn with god or expressed as a martyr and symbolically showed the omnipotence of god. Louis XVI was symbolized as almighty god by maximizing the authority and dignity of the king through the hands of justice that were used as a background or portrait accessory and a costume with the symbol of House of Bourbon. Kings of many generations were expressed as authoritative through portraits. However, Louis XVI showed a proletarian aspect in ordering portraits to reflect the daily working image of communicating with citizens. Active images such as the king riding a horse or administering the state affairs were emphasized in a political and military perspective; in addition, the benevolence of the king was symbolically presented through a family portrait. This symbolically signified that the king is a warm-hearted person who passionately takes care of state affairs and loves the people through a noble element coming from pastel colors and attributes of red colors. Historically, the political incompetence and indifference of kings was fragmentally emphasized; however, these portraits considered the king as one who tried to fulfill duties as the true king with a great interest in politics and the people.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제39권
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2015

Every country has a dark history in the process of transition to a modern state. Many countries have until the 21st century, especially in East Asia, colonialism, has experienced conflict influenced, racial discrimination, the trauma of such massacre. Such a dark history in many countries are also still in progress. Dark History of China, which maintains the proletarian dictatorship is the 'Cultural Revolution(Wenhua da Geming)'. 'Cultural Revolution' is neither the outer aspect of the ideological struggle, but in fact it was not even class struggle ideology and class struggle. Put an end to the feudal intellectuals in China in the course of the tragedy stood and lead to build a new China suffered the humiliation of being betrayed from state power. Chinese writers after the 'Cultural Revolution' ended, was created in the process of creation reflects the tragedy of the 'Cultural Revolution' in the country(national memory) is suffering from the pain and suffering the same growth process as it saw this novel growth experienced in the personal growth process. "Road leaving at 18 years" of WiHua has ruled out the pain of growing national attention wholly to personal growth and pain. Such "Road leaving at 18 years" in the sense suggests the possibility of a typical growth story in China Contemporary Literature.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제48권
• /
• pp.31-66
• /
• 2017

본고는 일본에서 저술된 한국문학사 중에서 임전혜의 "일본에서의 조선인문학의 역사-1945년까지"와 시라카와 유타카의 "조선근대문학의 발자취", 그리고 사에구사 도시카쓰의 "한국문학을 맛본다"를 중심으로 각 문학사에 나타난 한국근현대문학의 인식방법 및 서술양상을 '문화횡단'이라는 관점 아래 고찰하고 있다. 먼저 임전혜는 일본유학생들의 문학 활동과 프롤레타리아 문학운동을 중심으로 일본에서 산출된 조선인 문학을 시기별로 고찰하면서 한 일간의 능동적인 문화교섭과 상호이해, 정치적 연대의 지점들을 짚어낸다. 시라카와 유타카는 근대문학 형성과정에서의 한중일 삼국의 동시성과 연관성에 주목하고 일본어 문학과 친일문학 등을 비중 있게 다루면서 한국과 일본의 경계에서 충돌하는 매개적 연구자로서의 중층적 위치성을 보여준다. 사에구사 도시카쓰는 동아시아를 아우르는 비교문학적 고찰, 전통과 현대를 잇는 문학적 형식과 주제의 구현, '친일문학'을 바라보는 탈경계적 시선 등을 통해 한국문학의 내적논리와 외연을 두루 살피는 흥미로운 문화횡단적 계기들을 제공한다. 이들 문학사에서 살펴볼 수 있는 문화횡단적 실천 양상은 첫째, '민족문학사'를 근간으로 한 기존의 한국근현대문학사를 '식민지 경험'과 '국가민족주의'라는 자장에서 이화(異化)시켜 다면적으로 고찰하고 있다는 점, 둘째, 기존 한국문학사의 서술양상을 보완하는 입체적이고 미시적인 문학사 서술의 가능성을 제공한다는 점, 셋째, 동아시아를 아우르는 비교문학적 관점의 수용을 통해 확장되고 열린 문학사 서술의 계기를 마련한다는 점, 넷째, 재일조선인문학, 일본어 문학의 발견을 통해 한국근현대문학사의 외연을 넓히고 토대를 풍부하게 하는 데 기여한다는 점이다.