• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.343-352
• /
• 2012

In this paper we show that the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, but $P[x]{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. And we show a representation $0{\longrightarrow}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module, but $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. Then we show a representation $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.243-252
• /
• 2010

In this paper we extend the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left R-modules to the projective properties of representations of quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\rightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. And we show $0{\rightarrow}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module if and only if $0{\rightarrow}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. Then we show if P is a projective left R-module then $R[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. We also show that if $L\longrightarrow^{id}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module, then $L[x]\longrightarrow^{id}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.421-430
• /
• 1999

In this paper we investigate representation groups of wreathed 2-groups and explicitly determine all the linearly inequivalent irreducible projective representations of wreathed 2-groups.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.271-281
• /
• 2009

We define injective and projective representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$. Then we show that a representation $M_1\longrightarrow[50]^{f1}M_2\longrightarrow[50]^{f2}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is projective if and only if each $M_1,\;M_2,\;M_3$ is projective left R-module and $f_1(M_1)$ is a summand of $M_2$ and $f_2(M_2)$ is a summand of $M_3$. And we show that a representation $M_1\longrightarrow[50]^{f1}M_2\longrightarrow[50]^{f2}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is injective if and only if each $M_1,\;M_2,\;M_3$ is injective left R-module and $ker(f_1)$ is a summand of $M_1$ and $ker(f_2)$ is a summand of $M_2$.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.323-334
• /
• 2008

We define injective and projective representations of quivers with two vertices with n arrows. In the representation of quivers we denote n edges between two vertices as ${\Rightarrow}$ and n maps as $f_1{\sim}f_n$, and $E{\oplus}E{\oplus}{\cdots}{\oplus}E$ (n times) as ${\oplus}_nE$. We show that if E is an injective left R-module, then $${\oplus}_nE{\Longrightarrow[50]^{p_1{\sim}p_n}}E$$ is an injective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\Rightarrow}{\bullet}$ where $p_i(a_1,a_2,{\cdots},a_n)=a_i,\;i{\in}\{1,2,{\cdots},n\}$. Dually we show that if $M_1{\Longrightarrow[50]^{f_1{\sim}f_n}}M_2$ is an injective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\Rightarrow}{\bullet}$ then $M_1$ and $M_2$ are injective left R-modules. We also show that if P is a projective left R-module, then $$P\Longrightarrow[50]^{i_1{\sim}i_n}{\oplus}_nP$$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\Rightarrow}{\bullet}$ where $i_k$ is the kth injection. And if $M_1\Longrightarrow[50]^{f_1{\sim}f_n}M_2$ is an projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\Rightarrow}{\bullet}$ then $M_1$ and $M_2$ are projective left R-modules.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.429-436
• /
• 2009

We define a projective representation $M_1{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}M_2{\rightarrow}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ and consider their properties. Then we show that any projective representation $M_1{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}M_2{\rightarrow}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is isomorphic to the quotient of a direct sum of projective representations $0{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}0{\rightarrow}P,\;0{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}P{\rightarrow\limits^{id}}P$ and $P{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}^{e1}_{e2}P{\oplus}P{\rightarrow\limits^{id_{P{\oplus}P}}}P{\oplus}P$, where $e_1(a)=(a,0)$ and $e_2(a)=(0,a)$.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.481-492
• /
• 2000

As an application of Clifford theory, we are interested in a situation in which every irreducible projective character of a finite group G is an induced character of an irreducible linear character of some subgroup H of G. For this purpose, we study relative projective monomial groups with respect to subgroups.

• Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.367-373
• /
• 2007

For a unital *-subalgebra of the space $\mathcal{L}^a(X)$ of all adjointable maps on a Hilbert $\mathcal{B}$-module X with a $C^*$-algebra $\mathcal{B}$, we study unitary operator (in such algebra)-valued multiplier ${\sigma}$ on a normal, generating subsemigroup S of a group G with its extension to G. A dilation of a projective isometric ${\sigma}$-representation of S is established as a projective unitary ${\rho}$-representation of G for a suitable unitary operator (in some algebra)-valued multiplier ${\rho}$ associated with the multiplier ${\sigma}$ which is explicitly constructed.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2002

A Schur algebra was generalized to projective Schur algebra by admitting twisted group algebra. A Schur algebra is a projective Schur algebra with trivial 2-cocycle. In this paper we study situations that Schur algebra is a projective Schur algebra with nontrivial cocycle, and we find a criterion for a projective Schur algebra to be a Schur algebra.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.387-397
• /
• 1996

Let G be a finite group and F be a field of characteristic $p \geq 0$. Let $\Gamma = F^f G$ be a twisted group algebra corresponding to a 2-cocycle $f \in Z^2(G,F^*), where F^* = F - {0}$ is the multiplicative subgroup of F.