• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 1999년도 춘계공동학술대회:정보화시대의 지식경영
• /
• pp.414-414
• /
• 1999

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 1999년도 춘계공동학술대회:정보화시대의 지식경영
• /
• pp.415-415
• /
• 1999

• 한국지능정보시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지능정보시스템학회 2005년도 공동추계학술대회
• /
• pp.241-250
• /
• 2005

New product development (NPD) is defined as the transformation of a market opportunity and a set of assumptions about product technology into a product available for sale. Managers charged with project selection decisions in the NPD process, such as go/no-go choices and specific resource allocation decisions, are faced with a complicated problem. Therefore, the ability to develop new successful products has identifies as a major determinant in sustaining a firm's competitive advantage. The purpose of this study is to develop a new evaluation model for NPD project selection in the high -tech industry using support vector machines (SYM). The evaluation model is developed through two phases. In the first phase, binary (go/no-go) classification prediction model, i.e. SVM for high-tech NPD project selection is developed. In the second phase. using the predicted output value of SVM, feasibility grade is calculated for the final NPD project decision making. In this study, the feasibility grades are also divided as three level grades. We assume that the frequency of NPD project cases is symmetrically determined according to the feasibility grades and misclassification errors are partially minimized by the multiple grades. However, the horizon of grade level can be changed by firms' NPD strategy. Our proposed feasibility grade method is more reasonable in NPD decision problems by considering particularly risk factor of NPD in viewpoints of future NPD success probability. In our empirical study using Korean NPD cases, the SVM significantly outperformed ANN and logistic regression as benchmark models in hit ratio. And the feasibility grades generated from the predicted output value of SVM showed that they can offer a useful guideline for NPD project selection.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.297-305
• /
• 2021

A contractor or a main contractor is a company with full capacity to construct all project's works for the owner. A subcontractor is an organization that works with the main contractor to execute and complete work packages for the project. Selecting an effective subcontractor will help the efficiency and success of any projects in the construction industry. Therefore, this study identified subcontractor evaluation factors in Vietnam by collecting questionnaire survey data from engineers and staffs in the construction industry project environment. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then performed to identify the critical factors when evaluating and selecting the subcontractor in construction projects. Moreover, when considering the impact level in terms of the average value, the research results showed that the most critical concern was the subcontractor's reputation. Furthermore, the top five factors affecting the sub-contractor evaluation and selection are (i) reputation, (ii) price, (iii) construction techniques, (iv) ability to implement projects according to commitments, and (v) subcontractor competence (the team of workers, technician staff, engineers with full capacity according to regulations). These research results provide an overall perspective that will help main contractors develop suitable subcontractors' evaluation and selection factors in their projects in the construction industry.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2012년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.185-188
• /
• 2012

As a separate project unit, the domestic construction policy evaluation is independently evaluated and managed by different involvements, so that it has been difficult to have a consistent policy evaluation to be performed. In this paper, thus, it is aimed to give an overview of the evaluation system and issues of domestic construction policy and suggest strategies of a improved evaluation system by a comprehensive benchmarking of construction policy evaluation system of Japan. The implications of this paper will serve a basis of improvement of a better construction policy evaluation system in Korea.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.441-462
• /
• 2007

세계 각국은 국가경쟁력 향상을 위해 R&D 투자 확대 및 효율성 제고에 노력하고 있다. 따라서 국내 과학기술분야 학술정보 유통사업도 질적 제고 및 발전적 미래전략 도출을 위한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 국내의 대표적 과학기술 분야 학술정보 유통기관인 A기관을 대상으로 BSC 기반 성과지표를 적용하여 사업성과를 평가하고 평가결과를 이용하여 중요도 및 성과에 대한 포트폴리오 분석을 실시하였다. BSC기반 성과지표의 평가항목은 정보자원관점, 정보서비스관점, 이용자관점, 경제적관점의 4개 관점에서 정보자원 품질, 정보서비스 품질, 이용자 만족도 및 학술정보의 경제적 유용가치 등 12개 항목으로 구성하였다. 포트폴리오 분석에서는 성과지표별 포트폴리오 분석과 더불어 개별 성과지표의 구성요소별 분석을 실시하였으며, 성과평가 및 포트폴리오 분석결과에 기반하여 A기관의 학술정보 유통사업에 대한 관점별 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.87-104
• /
• 2012

국가의 신성장 동력으로써 유비쿼터스 도시(U-City) 개발이 추진되고 있다. U-City는 국가 차원에서 수행되는 미래전략 프로젝트이며, 도시의 다양한 문제점들을 해결하여 지속가능한 도시 조성에 그 목적이 있다. 또한, 전 세계적으로도 미래도시 연구의 선도적인 역할을 하고 있으며, 정부, 산업계를 비롯하여 학계에서도 U-City 개발과 관련한 다양한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 하지만, 무분별한 사업 추진과 장기적인 효과에 대한 가시적인 평가가 이루어지고 있지 않기 때문에 자칫 하면 난개발이 될 수 있다는 우려가 발생하고 있다. 따라서, 이러한 문제점들을 극복하고 보다 안정적인 개발이 이루어지기 위해서는 U-City 사업평가에 대한 근본적인 고찰이 필요할 것으로 보인다. 본 연구에서는 U-City 사업을 점검하기 위한 평가체계를 제시하고, U-City에 적용하여 평가체계의 활용방안을 논하고자 한다.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.966-971
• /
• 2003

[ $\lceil\;Cost Effectiveness Analysis\;\rfloor$ ] has been widely used to evaluate effectiveness of R&D resources. But, almost of cost effectiveness evaluation systems have some problems, especially estimating method of effect on R&D project is very rough and imprecise. To solve this problem, we have designed new single effect evaluation system, which are able to apply the distribution of order statistics and to transform relative measure into absolute measure for getting single effect.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.426-431
• /
• 2011

The quality of performance evaluation on engineering consultants that provide design-related technical services is difficult to be measured, and only a handful of papers discussed the quality during the design stage. Although design cost is relatively far less than construction cost for a project, the decisions made in the design phase have a significant impact on the final products of the project, especially for large public construction projects. Therefore, this research focuses on reviewing and then establishing a performance evaluation framework for the consulting firms that execute detailed design and provide technical services for the Taipei Rapid Transit Systems (TRTS). By interviewing experts, this study first established a set of indicators to evaluate these firms' performance. Then, those indicators were incorporated into the four aspects of balanced scorecard (BSC) to establish the architecture of the evaluation mechanism. The weight of each indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) from a survey conducted among experts. The results showed that the top-three indicators were quantity take-off, functions conformity, and budgeting. The framework of performance evaluation established by this study can be applied to measure service performance during the design stage. It not only facilitates the monitoring of consulting firms, but also helps to reduce unnecessary change orders and disputes during the construction stage.

• 정보처리학회논문지D
• /
• 제15D권3호
• /
• pp.387-398
• /
• 2008

최근 정보화에 대한 성과평가는 투자성과에 미치는 효과를 정량적, 정성적으로 분석하여, 전통적인 투자 수익률에 근거한 가치평가방법의 한계를 극복하기 위한 다양한 성과평가방법이 응용되고 있다. 하지만 공공분야의 성과평가는 평가영역에 대한 정성적 평가 중심의 성과여부를 도출하는데 머무를 뿐, 정보화 품질을 향상시키는 데까지는 이르지 못하는 단점이 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 기존 공공분야 성과평가의 한계점을 개선하고 품질평가와 정량적 평가를 반영함으로써, 정보화 품질 향상과 평가결과의 객관성 및 신뢰성을 보장하는 통합성과평가모델을 제안한다. 그리고 정보화사업으로 추진된 행정정보DB구축사업을 대상으로 사업목적을 고려한 평가영역별 반영비율 및 가중치를 적용한 평가결과를 도출하였다.