• Title/Summary/Keyword: principal fitted response reduction

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

MBRDR: R-package for response dimension reduction in multivariate regression

  • Heesung Ahn;Jae Keun Yoo
    • Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.179-189
    • /
    • 2024
  • In multivariate regression with a high-dimensional response Y ∈ ℝr and a relatively low-dimensional predictor X ∈ ℝp (where r ≥ 2), the statistical analysis of such data presents significant challenges due to the exponential increase in the number of parameters as the dimension of the response grows. Most existing dimension reduction techniques primarily focus on reducing the dimension of the predictors (X), not the dimension of the response variable (Y). Yoo and Cook (2008) introduced a response dimension reduction method that preserves information about the conditional mean E(Y | X). Building upon this foundational work, Yoo (2018) proposed two semi-parametric methods, principal response reduction (PRR) and principal fitted response reduction (PFRR), then expanded these methods to unstructured principal fitted response reduction (UPFRR) (Yoo, 2019). This paper reviews these four response dimension reduction methodologies mentioned above. In addition, it introduces the implementation of the mbrdr package in R. The mbrdr is a unique tool in the R community, as it is specifically designed for response dimension reduction, setting it apart from existing dimension reduction packages that focus solely on predictors.

Principal selected response reduction in multivariate regression (다변량회귀에서 주선택 반응변수 차원축소)

  • Yoo, Jae Keun
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.34 no.4
    • /
    • pp.659-669
    • /
    • 2021
  • Multivariate regression often appears in longitudinal or functional data analysis. Since multivariate regression involves multi-dimensional response variables, it is more strongly affected by the so-called curse of dimension that univariate regression. To overcome this issue, Yoo (2018) and Yoo (2019a) proposed three model-based response dimension reduction methodologies. According to various numerical studies in Yoo (2019a), the default method suggested in Yoo (2019a) is least sensitive to the simulated models, but it is not the best one. To release this issue, the paper proposes an selection algorithm by comparing the other two methods with the default one. This approach is called principal selected response reduction. Various simulation studies show that the proposed method provides more accurate estimation results than the default one by Yoo (2019a), and it confirms practical and empirical usefulness of the propose method over the default one by Yoo (2019a).